Theorem eleq1ab 2716

Description: Extension (in the sense of Remark 3 of the comment of df-clab 2715) of elequ1 2116 from formulas of the form "setvar ∈ setvar" to formulas of the form "setvar ∈ class abstraction". This extension does not require ax-8 2111 contrary to elequ1 2116, but recall from Remark 3 of the comment of df-clab 2715 that it can be considered an extension only because of cvjust 2730, which does require ax-8 2111.

This is an instance of eleq1w 2818 where the containing class is a class abstraction, and contrary to it, it can be proved without df-clel 2810. See also eleq1 2823 for general classes.

The straightforward yet important fact that this statement can be proved from FOL= plus df-clab 2715 (hence without ax-ext 2708, df-cleq 2728 or df-clel 2810) was stressed by Mario Carneiro. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eleq1ab	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}))

Proof of Theorem eleq1ab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbequ 2084	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑))
2		df-clab 2715	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑)
3		df-clab 2715	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑)
4	1, 2, 3	3bitr4g 314	1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206  [wsb 2065   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2714

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2715

This theorem is referenced by:  cleljustab  2717  ralab2  3685  rexab2  3687