Theorem equidqe 38945

Description: equid 2012 with existential quantifier without using ax-c5 38906 or ax-5 1910. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equidqe	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥

Proof of Theorem equidqe

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax6fromc10 38919	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥
2		ax7 2016	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥 = 𝑥))
3	2	pm2.43i 52	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥 = 𝑥)
4	3	con3i 154	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥)
5	4	alimi 1811	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥)
6	1, 5	mto 197	1 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  ∀wal 1538

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-c7 38908  ax-c10 38909

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1780

This theorem is referenced by:  axc5sp1  38946  equidq  38947