Theorem ax7 2018

Description: Proof of ax-7 2010 from ax7v1 2012 and ax7v2 2013 (and earlier axioms), proving sufficiency of the conjunction of the latter two weakened versions of ax7v 2011, which is itself a weakened version of ax-7 2010.

Note that the weakened version of ax-7 2010 obtained by adding a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑧 (resp. on 𝑦, 𝑧) does not permit, together with the other axioms, to prove reflexivity (resp. symmetry). (Contributed by BJ, 7-Dec-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax7	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))

Proof of Theorem ax7

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax7v2 2013	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑡 = 𝑦))
2		ax7v2 2013	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝑡 = 𝑧))
3		ax7v1 2012	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑦 → (𝑡 = 𝑧 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
4	3	imp 406	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑡 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
5	4	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → ((𝑡 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
6	1, 2, 5	syl2and 609	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
7		ax6evr 2017	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑡 𝑥 = 𝑡
8	6, 7	exlimiiv 1933	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
9	8	ex 412	1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1782

This theorem is referenced by:  equcomi  2019  equtr  2023  equequ1  2027  cbvaev  2057  aeveq  2060  axc16i  2441  equvel  2461  mo4  2567  axextnd  10514  in-ax8  36437  ss-ax8  36438  wl-aetr  37778  wl-exeq  37783  wl-aleq  37784  wl-nfeqfb  37785  equcomi1  39270  hbequid  39279  equidqe  39292  aev-o  39301  ax6e2eq  44907  ax6e2eqVD  45256  et-equeucl  47224  2reu8i  47467