Theorem ax7 2049

Description: Proof of ax-7 2041 from ax7v1 2043 and ax7v2 2044 (and earlier axioms), proving sufficiency of the conjunction of the latter two weakened versions of ax7v 2042, which is itself a weakened version of ax-7 2041.

Note that the weakened version of ax-7 2041 obtained by adding a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑧 (resp. on 𝑦, 𝑧) does not permit, together with the other axioms, to prove reflexivity (resp. symmetry). (Contributed by BJ, 7-Dec-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax7	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))

Proof of Theorem ax7

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax7v2 2044	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑡 = 𝑦))
2		ax7v2 2044	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝑡 = 𝑧))
3		ax7v1 2043	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑦 → (𝑡 = 𝑧 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
4	3	imp 412	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑡 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
5	4	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → ((𝑡 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
6	1, 2, 5	syl2and 620	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
7		ax6evr 2048	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑡 𝑥 = 𝑡
8	6, 7	exlimiiv 1964	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
9	8	ex 418	1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813

This theorem is used by:  equcomi  2050  equtr  2054  equequ1  2058  cbvaev  2088  aeveq  2091  axc16i  2471  equvel  2491  mo4  2597  axextnd  10594  in-ax8  36777  ss-ax8  36778  wl-aetr  38225  wl-exeq  38230  wl-aleq  38231  wl-nfeqfb  38232  equcomi1  39715  hbequid  39724  equidqe  39737  aev-o  39746  ax6e2eq  45307  ax6e2eqVD  45656  et-equeucl  47627  2reu8i  47891