Theorem equsex 2440

Description: An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2390. See equsexvw 2011 and equsexv 2269 for versions with disjoint variable conditions proved from fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsal 2439. See equsexALT 2441 for an alternate proof. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equsal.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
equsal.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equsex	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem equsex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equsal.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		equsal.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	biimpa 479	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
4	1, 3	exlimi 2217	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
5	1, 2	equsal 2439	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
6		equs4 2438	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
7	5, 6	sylbir 237	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
8	4, 7	impbii 211	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1535  ∃wex 1780  Ⅎwnf 1784

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-12 2177  ax-13 2390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785

This theorem is referenced by:  equsexh  2443  sb5rf  2490