Theorem equsex 2418

Description: An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. See equsexvw 2009 and equsexv 2260 for versions with disjoint variable conditions proved from fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsal 2417. See equsexALT 2419 for an alternate proof. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equsal.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
equsal.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equsex	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem equsex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equsal.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		equsal.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	biimpa 478	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
4	1, 3	exlimi 2211	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
5	1, 2	equsal 2417	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
6		equs4 2416	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
7	5, 6	sylbir 234	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
8	4, 7	impbii 208	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397  ∀wal 1540  ∃wex 1782  Ⅎwnf 1786

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-12 2172  ax-13 2372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787

This theorem is referenced by:  equsexh  2421  sb5rf  2467