Theorem equsex 2418

Description: An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. See equsexvw 2006 and equsexv 2271 for versions with disjoint variable conditions proved from fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsal 2417. See equsexALT 2419 for an alternate proof. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equsal.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
equsal.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equsex	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem equsex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equsal.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		equsal.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	biimpa 476	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
4	1, 3	exlimi 2220	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
5	1, 2	equsal 2417	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
6		equs4 2416	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
7	5, 6	sylbir 235	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
8	4, 7	impbii 209	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1539  ∃wex 1780  Ⅎwnf 1784

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-12 2180  ax-13 2372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785

This theorem is referenced by:  equsexh  2421  sb5rf  2467