Theorem equsexvw 2004

Description: Version of equsexv 2269 with a disjoint variable condition, and of equsex 2426 with two disjoint variable conditions, which requires fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsalvw 2003. (Contributed by BJ, 31-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Oct-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
equsalvw.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equsexvw	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem equsexvw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		alinexa 1841	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
2		equsalvw.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	notbid 318	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
4	3	equsalvw 2003	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ 𝜓)
5	1, 4	bitr3i 277	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ 𝜓)
6	5	con4bii 321	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535  ∃wex 1777

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1778

This theorem is referenced by:  equvinv  2028  cleljust  2117  sbelx  2254  cleljustab  2720  sbhypfOLD  3557  axsepgfromrep  5315  dfid3  5596  opeliunxp  5767  imai  6103  coi1  6293  opabex3d  8006  opabex3rd  8007  opabex3  8008  fsplit  8158  mapsnend  9101  dfac5lem1  10192  dfac5lem3  10194  dffix2  35869  sscoid  35877  elfuns  35879  pmapglb  39727  polval2N  39863  tfsconcat0i  43307  opeliun2xp  48057