Theorem equsexv 2263

Description: An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Version of equsex 2418 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. See equsexvw 2009 for a version with two disjoint variable conditions requiring fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsalv 2262. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.) Avoid ax-10 2139. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 18-Nov-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equsalv.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
equsalv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equsexv	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem equsexv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equsalv.nf	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		equsalv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	biimpa 476	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
4	1, 3	exlimi 2213	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
5	1, 2	equsalv 2262	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
6		equs4v 2004	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
7	5, 6	sylbir 234	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
8	4, 7	impbii 208	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1783  Ⅎwnf 1787

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-12 2173

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788

This theorem is referenced by:  sb5OLD  2272  equsexhv  2292  cleljustALT2  2363  sb10f  2532  dprd2d2  19562  poimirlem25  35729