Theorem frege55b 44549

Description: Lemma for frege57b 44551. Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50.

Note that eqtr2 2790 incorporates eqcom 2776 which is stronger than this proposition which is identical to equcomi 2044. Is it possible that Frege tricked himself into assuming what he was out to prove? (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege55b	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Proof of Theorem frege55b

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege55lem2b 44548	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥)
2		dfsb1 2519	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ ((𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑥) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥)))
3		eqtr2 2790	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥) → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
4	3	exlimiv 1957	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥) → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
5	4	adantl 486	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑥) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥)) → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
6	2, 5	sylbi 220	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
7	1, 6	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400  ∃wex 1806  [wsb 2097

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-12 2219  ax-13 2410  ax-ext 2741  ax-frege8 44461  ax-frege52c 44540

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-sbc 3754

This theorem is referenced by:  frege56b  44550