Theorem frege55b 42648

Description: Lemma for frege57b 42650. Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50.

Note that eqtr2 2757 incorporates eqcom 2740 which is stronger than this proposition which is identical to equcomi 2021. Is it possible that Frege tricked himself into assuming what he was out to prove? (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege55b	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Proof of Theorem frege55b

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege55lem2b 42647	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥)
2		dfsb1 2481	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ ((𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑥) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥)))
3		eqtr2 2757	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥) → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
4	3	exlimiv 1934	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥) → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
5	4	adantl 483	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑥) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥)) → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
6	2, 5	sylbi 216	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
7	1, 6	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 397  ∃wex 1782  [wsb 2068

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-12 2172  ax-13 2372  ax-ext 2704  ax-frege8 42560  ax-frege52c 42639

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-sbc 3779

This theorem is referenced by:  frege56b  42649