Theorem frege55b 44474

Description: Lemma for frege57b 44476. Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50.

Note that eqtr2 2784 incorporates eqcom 2770 which is stronger than this proposition which is identical to equcomi 2038. Is it possible that Frege tricked himself into assuming what he was out to prove? (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege55b	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Proof of Theorem frege55b

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege55lem2b 44473	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥)
2		dfsb1 2513	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ ((𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑥) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥)))
3		eqtr2 2784	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥) → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
4	3	exlimiv 1951	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥) → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
5	4	adantl 485	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑥) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑥)) → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
6	2, 5	sylbi 219	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
7	1, 6	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399  ∃wex 1800  [wsb 2091

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1816  ax-4 1830  ax-5 1931  ax-6 1988  ax-7 2029  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-12 2213  ax-13 2404  ax-ext 2735  ax-frege8 44386  ax-frege52c 44465

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-ex 1801  df-nf 1805  df-sb 2092  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-sbc 3746

This theorem is referenced by:  frege56b  44475