P. 428 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 42701-42800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mzpcln0 42701	Corollary of mzpclall 42700: polynomially closed function sets are not empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	mzpcl1 42702	Defining property 1 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it contains all constant functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝐹}) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	mzpcl2 42703*	Defining property 2 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it contains all projections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝐹)) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	mzpcl34 42704	Defining properties 3 and 4 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it is closed under pointwise addition and multiplication. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐹 ∘f + 𝐺) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∈ 𝑃))
Theorem	mzpval 42705	Value of the mzPoly function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPoly‘𝑉) = ∩ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉))
Theorem	dmmzp 42706	mzPoly is defined for all index sets which are sets. This is used with elfvdm 6861 to eliminate sethood antecedents. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ dom mzPoly = V
Theorem	mzpincl 42707	Polynomial closedness is a universal first-order property and passes to intersections. This is where the closure properties of the polynomial ring itself are proved. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpconst 42708	Constant functions are polynomial. See also mzpconstmpt 42713. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝐶}) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpf 42709	A polynomial function is a function from the coordinate space to the integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) → 𝐹:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ)
Theorem	mzpproj 42710*	A projection function is polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝑋)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpadd 42711	The pointwise sum of two polynomial functions is a polynomial function. See also mzpaddmpt 42714. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝐴 ∘f + 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpmul 42712	The pointwise product of two polynomial functions is a polynomial function. See also mzpmulmpt 42715. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝐴 ∘f · 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpconstmpt 42713*	A constant function expressed in maps-to notation is polynomial. This theorem and the several that follow (mzpaddmpt 42714, mzpmulmpt 42715, mzpnegmpt 42717, mzpsubmpt 42716, mzpexpmpt 42718) can be used to build proofs that functions which are "manifestly polynomial", in the sense of being a maps-to containing constants, projections, and simple arithmetic operations, are actually polynomial functions. There is no mzpprojmpt because mzpproj 42710 is already expressed using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐶) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpaddmpt 42714*	Sum of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpadd 42711. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 + 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpmulmpt 42715*	Product of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpmulmpt 42715. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpsubmpt 42716*	The difference of two polynomial functions is polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpnegmpt 42717*	Negation of a polynomial function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ -𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpexpmpt 42718*	Raise a polynomial function to a (fixed) exponent. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴↑𝐷)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉))
Theorem	mzpindd 42719*	"Structural" induction to prove properties of all polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ℤ) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜁)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜎)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑓}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝑓)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑓 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → 𝜌)
Theorem	mzpmfp 42720	Relationship between multivariate Z-polynomials and general multivariate polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (mzPoly‘𝐼) = ran (𝐼 eval ℤring)
Theorem	mzpsubst 42721*	Substituting polynomials for the variables of a polynomial results in a polynomial. 𝐺 is expected to depend on 𝑦 and provide the polynomials which are being substituted. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 𝐺 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐺‘𝑥)))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzprename 42722*	Simplified version of mzpsubst 42721 to simply relabel variables in a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝑅:𝑉⟶𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∘ 𝑅))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzpresrename 42723*	A polynomial is a polynomial over all larger index sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑉))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊))
Theorem	mzpcompact2lem 42724*	Lemma for mzpcompact2 42725. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎)))))
Theorem	mzpcompact2 42725*	Polynomials are finitary objects and can only reference a finite number of variables, even if the index set is infinite. Thus, every polynomial can be expressed as a (uniquely minimal, although we do not prove that) polynomial on a finite number of variables, which is then extended by adding an arbitrary set of ignored variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎)))))
21.33.9  Miscellanea for Diophantine sets 1
Theorem	coeq0i 42726	coeq0 6208 but without explicitly introducing domain and range symbols. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴:𝐶⟶𝐷 ∧ 𝐵:𝐸⟶𝐹 ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐹) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	fzsplit1nn0 42727	Split a finite 1-based set of integers in the middle, allowing either end to be empty ((1...0)). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (1...𝐵) = ((1...𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 + 1)...𝐵)))
21.33.10  Diophantine sets 1: definitions
Syntax	cdioph 42728	Extend class notation to include the family of Diophantine sets.
class Dioph
Definition	df-dioph 42729*	A Diophantine set is a set of positive integers which is a projection of the zero set of some polynomial. This definition somewhat awkwardly mixes ℤ (via mzPoly) and ℕ0 (to define the zero sets); the former could be avoided by considering coincidence sets of ℕ0 polynomials at the cost of requiring two, and the second is driven by consistency with our mu-recursive functions and the requirements of the Davis-Putnam-Robinson-Matiyasevich proof. Both are avoidable at a complexity cost. In particular, it is a consequence of 4sq 16894 that implicitly restricting variables to ℕ0 adds no expressive power over allowing them to range over ℤ. While this definition stipulates a specific index set for the polynomials, there is actually flexibility here, see eldioph2b 42736. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ Dioph = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ran (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑛), 𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑘)) ↦ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑘))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑛)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldiophb 42730*	Initial expression of Diophantine property of a set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑘))𝐷 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑘))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldioph 42731*	Condition for a set to be Diophantine (unpacking existential quantifier). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝐾))) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐾))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	diophrw 42732*	Renaming and adding unused witness variables does not change the Diophantine set coded by a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀:𝑇–1-1→𝑆 ∧ (𝑀 ↾ 𝑂) = ( I ↾ 𝑂)) → {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑎 = (𝑏 ↾ 𝑂) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑆) ↦ (𝑃‘(𝑑 ∘ 𝑀)))‘𝑏) = 0)} = {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑇)(𝑎 = (𝑐 ↾ 𝑂) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑐) = 0)})
Theorem	eldioph2lem1 42733*	Lemma for eldioph2 42735. Construct necessary renaming function for one direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝐴) → ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)∃𝑒 ∈ V (𝑒:(1...𝑑)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (𝑒 ↾ (1...𝑁)) = ( I ↾ (1...𝑁))))
Theorem	eldioph2lem2 42734*	Lemma for eldioph2 42735. Construct necessary renaming function for one direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ∧ ((1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))) → ∃𝑐(𝑐:(1...𝐴)–1-1→𝑆 ∧ (𝑐 ↾ (1...𝑁)) = ( I ↾ (1...𝑁))))
Theorem	eldioph2 42735*	Construct a Diophantine set from a polynomial with witness variables drawn from any set whatsoever, via mzpcompact2 42725. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑆)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eldioph2b 42736*	While Diophantine sets were defined to have a finite number of witness variables consequtively following the observable variables, this is not necessary; they can equivalently be taken to use any witness set (𝑆 ∖ (1...𝑁)). For instance, in diophin 42745 we use this to take the two input sets to have disjoint witness sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ V) ∧ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆)) → (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑆)𝐴 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldiophelnn0 42737	Remove antecedent on 𝐵 from Diophantine set constructors. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eldioph3b 42738*	Define Diophantine sets in terms of polynomials with variables indexed by ℕ. This avoids a quantifier over the number of witness variables and will be easier to use than eldiophb 42730 in most cases. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘ℕ)𝐴 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℕ)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)}))
Theorem	eldioph3 42739*	Inference version of eldioph3b 42738 with quantifier expanded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘ℕ)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℕ)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.33.11  Diophantine sets 2 miscellanea
Theorem	ellz1 42740	Membership in a lower set of integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℤ → (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 1))) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)))
Theorem	lzunuz 42741	The union of a lower set of integers and an upper set of integers which abut or overlap is all of the integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≤ (𝐴 + 1)) → ((ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝐴 + 1))) ∪ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) = ℤ)
Theorem	fz1eqin 42742	Express a one-based finite range as the intersection of lower integers with ℕ. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (1...𝑁) = ((ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) ∩ ℕ))
Theorem	lzenom 42743	Lower integers are countably infinite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) ≈ ω)
Theorem	elmapresaunres2 42744	fresaunres2 6700 transposed to mappings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐺 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) ↾ 𝐵) = 𝐺)
21.33.12  Diophantine sets 2: union and intersection. Monotone Boolean algebra
Theorem	diophin 42745	If two sets are Diophantine, so is their intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	diophun 42746	If two sets are Diophantine, so is their union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eldiophss 42747	Diophantine sets are sets of tuples of nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐵)))
21.33.13  Diophantine sets 3: construction
Theorem	diophrex 42748*	Projecting a Diophantine set by removing a coordinate results in a Diophantine set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁))} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eq0rabdioph 42749*	This is the first of a number of theorems which allow sets to be proven Diophantine by syntactic induction, and models the correspondence between Diophantine sets and monotone existential first-order logic. This first theorem shows that the zero set of an implicit polynomial is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 = 0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eqrabdioph 42750*	Diophantine set builder for equality of polynomial expressions. Note that the two expressions need not be nonnegative; only variables are so constrained. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 = 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	0dioph 42751	The null set is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → ∅ ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴))
Theorem	vdioph 42752	The "universal" set (as large as possible given eldiophss 42747) is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐴)) ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴))
Theorem	anrabdioph 42753*	Diophantine set builder for conjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	orrabdioph 42754*	Diophantine set builder for disjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	3anrabdioph 42755*	Diophantine set builder for ternary conjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜒} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	3orrabdioph 42756*	Diophantine set builder for ternary disjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜒} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.33.14  Diophantine sets 4 miscellanea
Theorem	2sbcrex 42757*	Exchange an existential quantifier with two substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcrexgOLD 42758*	Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) Obsolete as of 18-Aug-2018. Use sbcrex 3829 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	2sbcrexOLD 42759*	Exchange an existential quantifier with two substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) Obsolete as of 24-Aug-2018. Use csbov123 7397 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑)
Theorem	sbc2rex 42760*	Exchange a substitution with two existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbc2rexgOLD 42761*	Exchange a substitution with two existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) Obsolete as of 24-Aug-2018. Use csbov123 7397 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
Theorem	sbc4rex 42762*	Exchange a substitution with four existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbc4rexgOLD 42763*	Exchange a substitution with four existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) Obsolete as of 24-Aug-2018. Use csbov123 7397 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
Theorem	sbcrot3 42764*	Rotate a sequence of three explicit substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbcrot5 42765*	Rotate a sequence of five explicit substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐷 / 𝑑][𝐸 / 𝑒]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐷 / 𝑑][𝐸 / 𝑒][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
Theorem	sbccomieg 42766*	Commute two explicit substitutions, using an implicit substitution to rewrite the exiting substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
21.33.15  Diophantine sets 4: Quantification
Theorem	rexrabdioph 42767*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantification. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ (𝑣 = (𝑡‘𝑀) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑢 = (𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	rexfrabdioph 42768*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	2rexfrabdioph 42769*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, two variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐿)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐿)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	3rexfrabdioph 42770*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, two variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐾)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐾)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	4rexfrabdioph 42771*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, four variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐽)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐽)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	6rexfrabdioph 42772*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, six variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐽 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐻)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦][(𝑡‘𝐼) / 𝑧][(𝑡‘𝐻) / 𝑝]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐻)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	7rexfrabdioph 42773*	Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, seven variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐽 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐻 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐺)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦][(𝑡‘𝐼) / 𝑧][(𝑡‘𝐻) / 𝑝][(𝑡‘𝐺) / 𝑞]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐺)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑞 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.33.16  Diophantine sets 5: Arithmetic sets
Theorem	rabdiophlem1 42774*	Lemma for arithmetic diophantine sets. Convert polynomial-ness of an expression into a constraint suitable for ralimi 3066. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) → ∀𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁))𝐴 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	rabdiophlem2 42775*	Lemma for arithmetic diophantine sets. Reuse a polynomial expression under a new quantifier. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑀)) ↦ ⦋(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢⦌𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑀)))
Theorem	elnn0rabdioph 42776*	Diophantine set builder for nonnegativity constraints. The first builder which uses a witness variable internally; an expression is nonnegative if there is a nonnegative integer equal to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	rexzrexnn0 42777*	Rewrite an existential quantification restricted to integers into an existential quantification restricted to naturals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	lerabdioph 42778*	Diophantine set builder for the "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	eluzrabdioph 42779*	Diophantine set builder for membership in a fixed upper set of integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	elnnrabdioph 42780*	Diophantine set builder for positivity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	ltrabdioph 42781*	Diophantine set builder for the strict less than relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 < 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	nerabdioph 42782*	Diophantine set builder for inequality. This not quite trivial theorem touches on something important; Diophantine sets are not closed under negation, but they contain an important subclass that is, namely the recursive sets. With this theorem and De Morgan's laws, all quantifier-free formulas can be negated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsrabdioph 42783*	Divisibility is a Diophantine relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.33.17  Diophantine sets 6: reusability. renumbering of variables
Theorem	eldioph4b 42784*	Membership in Dioph expressed using a quantified union to add witness variables instead of a restriction to remove them. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑊 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝑊 ∈ Fin    &   ⊢ (𝑊 ∩ ℕ) = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(𝑊 ∪ (1...𝑁)))𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑊)(𝑝‘(𝑡 ∪ 𝑤)) = 0}))
Theorem	eldioph4i 42785*	Forward-only version of eldioph4b 42784. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝑊 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝑊 ∈ Fin    &   ⊢ (𝑊 ∩ ℕ) = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘(𝑊 ∪ (1...𝑁)))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑊)(𝑃‘(𝑡 ∪ 𝑤)) = 0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
Theorem	diophren 42786*	Change variables in a Diophantine set, using class notation. This allows already proved Diophantine sets to be reused in contexts with more variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹:(1...𝑁)⟶(1...𝑀)) → {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ (𝑎 ∘ 𝐹) ∈ 𝑆} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀))
Theorem	rabrenfdioph 42787*	Change variable numbers in a Diophantine class abstraction using explicit substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹:(1...𝐴)⟶(1...𝐵) ∧ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐴)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴)) → {𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐵)) ∣ [(𝑏 ∘ 𝐹) / 𝑎]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵))
Theorem	rabren3dioph 42788*	Change variable numbers in a 3-variable Diophantine class abstraction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑎‘1) = (𝑏‘𝑋) ∧ (𝑎‘2) = (𝑏‘𝑌) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = (𝑏‘𝑍)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ (1...𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ (1...𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ (1...𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘3)) → {𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁))
21.33.18  Pigeonhole Principle and cardinality helpers
Theorem	fphpd 42789*	Pigeonhole principle expressed with implicit substitution. If the range is smaller than the domain, two inputs must be mapped to the same output. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	fphpdo 42790*	Pigeonhole principle for sets of real numbers with implicit output reordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	ctbnfien 42791	An infinite subset of a countable set is countable, without using choice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ≈ ω ∧ 𝑌 ≈ ω) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑌)
Theorem	fiphp3d 42792*	Infinite pigeonhole principle for partitioning an infinite set between finitely many buckets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐷 = 𝑦} ≈ ℕ)
21.33.19  A non-closed set of reals is infinite
Theorem	rencldnfilem 42793*	Lemma for rencldnfi 42794. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐵)) < 𝑥) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	rencldnfi 42794*	A set of real numbers which comes arbitrarily close to some target yet excludes it is infinite. The work is done in rencldnfilem 42793 using infima; this theorem removes the requirement that A be nonempty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐵)) < 𝑥) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
21.33.20  Lagrange's rational approximation theorem
Theorem	irrapxlem1 42795*	Lemma for irrapx1 42801. Divides the unit interval into 𝐵 half-open sections and using the pigeonhole principle fphpdo 42790 finds two multiples of 𝐴 in the same section mod 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (0...𝐵)(𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ (⌊‘(𝐵 · ((𝐴 · 𝑥) mod 1))) = (⌊‘(𝐵 · ((𝐴 · 𝑦) mod 1)))))
Theorem	irrapxlem2 42796*	Lemma for irrapx1 42801. Two multiples in the same bucket means they are very close mod 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (0...𝐵)(𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(((𝐴 · 𝑥) mod 1) − ((𝐴 · 𝑦) mod 1))) < (1 / 𝐵)))
Theorem	irrapxlem3 42797*	Lemma for irrapx1 42801. By subtraction, there is a multiple very close to an integer. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (1...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (abs‘((𝐴 · 𝑥) − 𝑦)) < (1 / 𝐵))
Theorem	irrapxlem4 42798*	Lemma for irrapx1 42801. Eliminate ranges, use positivity of the input to force positivity of the output by increasing 𝐵 as needed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ (abs‘((𝐴 · 𝑥) − 𝑦)) < (1 / if(𝑥 ≤ 𝐵, 𝐵, 𝑥)))
Theorem	irrapxlem5 42799*	Lemma for irrapx1 42801. Switching to real intervals and fraction syntax. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℚ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝐵 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑥)↑-2)))
Theorem	irrapxlem6 42800*	Lemma for irrapx1 42801. Explicit description of a non-closed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑦)↑-2))} (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝐵)