Theorem ichan 47565

Description: If two setvar variables are interchangeable in two wffs, then they are interchangeable in the conjunction of these two wffs. Notice that the reverse implication is not necessarily true. Corresponding theorems will hold for other commutative operations, too. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jul-2023.) Use df-ich 47556 instead of dfich2 47568 to reduce axioms. (Revised by SN, 4-May-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ichan	⊢ (([𝑎⇄𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑎⇄𝑏]𝜓) → [𝑎⇄𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem ichan

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sban 2083	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑥 / 𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓))
2	1	sbbii 2079	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [𝑏 / 𝑎]([𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓))
3	2	sbbii 2079	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎]([𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓))
4		sban 2083	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑏 / 𝑎]([𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓))
5	4	sbbii 2079	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎]([𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓) ↔ [𝑎 / 𝑥]([𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓))
6		sban 2083	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥]([𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓))
7	3, 5, 6	3bitri 297	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓))
8		pm4.38 637	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ ([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓)) → (([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
9	7, 8	bitrid 283	. . . 4 ⊢ ((([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ ([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓)) → ([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
10	9	alanimi 1817	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓)) → ∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
11	10	alanimi 1817	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑎∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑎∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓)) → ∀𝑎∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
12		df-ich 47556	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑎⇄𝑏]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑎∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
13		df-ich 47556	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑎⇄𝑏]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑎∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓))
14	12, 13	anbi12i 628	. 2 ⊢ (([𝑎⇄𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑎⇄𝑏]𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑎∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑎∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓)))
15		df-ich 47556	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑎⇄𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑎∀𝑏([𝑎 / 𝑥][𝑏 / 𝑎][𝑥 / 𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
16	11, 14, 15	3imtr4i 292	1 ⊢ (([𝑎⇄𝑏]𝜑 ∧ [𝑎⇄𝑏]𝜓) → [𝑎⇄𝑏](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1539  [wsb 2067  [wich 47555

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-sb 2068  df-ich 47556

This theorem is referenced by:  ichim  47567