P. 462 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 46101-46200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	climxrrelem 46101*	If a sequence ranging over the extended reals converges w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers, then there exists an upper set of the integers over which the function is real-valued. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ +∞ ∈ ℂ) → 𝐷 ≤ (abs‘(+∞ − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ -∞ ∈ ℂ) → 𝐷 ≤ (abs‘(-∞ − 𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶ℝ)
Theorem	climxrre 46102*	If a sequence ranging over the extended reals converges w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers, then there exists an upper set of the integers over which the function is real-valued (the weaker hypothesis 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ is probably not enough, since in principle we could have +∞ ∈ ℂ and -∞ ∈ ℂ). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶ℝ)
21.43.7.1  Inferior limit (lim inf)
Syntax	clsi 46103	Extend class notation to include the liminf function. (actually, it makes sense for any extended real function defined on a subset of RR which is not upper-bounded)
class lim inf
Definition	df-liminf 46104*	Define the inferior limit of a sequence of extended real numbers. (Contributed by GS, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ lim inf = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ sup(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝑥 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsuplt2 46105*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) < 𝐴))
Theorem	liminfgord 46106	Ordering property of the inferior limit function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → inf(((𝐹 “ (𝐴[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) ≤ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝐵[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupvald 46107*	The superior limit of a sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers is the infimum of the set of suprema of all restrictions of 𝐹 to an upperset of reals . (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupresicompt 46108*	The superior limit doesn't change when a function is restricted to the upper part of the reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀[,)+∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = (lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑍) ↦ 𝐵)))
Theorem	limsupcli 46109	Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	liminfgf 46110	Closure of the inferior limit function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ*
Theorem	liminfval 46111*	The inferior limit of a set 𝐹. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	climlimsup 46112	A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if it converges to its superior limit. The first hypothesis is needed (see climlimsupcex 46121 for a counterexample). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹)))
Theorem	limsupge 46113*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )))
Theorem	liminfgval 46114*	Value of the inferior limit function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℝ → (𝐺‘𝑀) = inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑀[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	liminfcl 46115	Closure of the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	liminfvald 46116*	The inferior limit of a set 𝐹. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	liminfval5 46117*	The inferior limit of an infinite sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupresxr 46118	The superior limit of a function only depends on the restriction of that function to the preimage of the set of extended reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (◡𝐹 “ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) = (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfresxr 46119	The inferior limit of a function only depends on the preimage of the extended real part. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (◡𝐹 “ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) = (lim inf‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfval2 46120*	The superior limit, relativized to an unbounded set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup((𝐺 “ 𝐴), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	climlimsupcex 46121	Counterexample for climlimsup 46112, showing that the first hypothesis is needed, if the empty set is a complex number (see 0ncn 11056 and its comment). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ¬ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ ((∅ ∈ ℂ ∧ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ) → (𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ ¬ 𝐹 ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹)))
Theorem	liminfcld 46122	Closure of the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	liminfresico 46123	The inferior limit doesn't change when a function is restricted to an upperset of reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀[,)+∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim inf‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsup10exlem 46124*	The range of the given function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ (𝐾[,)+∞)) = {0, 1})
Theorem	limsup10ex 46125	The superior limit of a function that alternates between two values. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (lim sup‘𝐹) = 1
Theorem	liminf10ex 46126	The inferior limit of a function that alternates between two values. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (lim inf‘𝐹) = 0
Theorem	liminflelimsuplem 46127*	The superior limit is greater than or equal to the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ (𝑘[,)+∞)((𝐹 “ (𝑗[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminflelimsup 46128*	The superior limit is greater than or equal to the inferior limit. The second hypothesis is needed (see liminflelimsupcex 46149 for a counterexample). The inequality can be strict, see liminfltlimsupex 46133. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ (𝑘[,)+∞)((𝐹 “ (𝑗[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsupgtlem 46129*	For any positive real, the superior limit of F is larger than any of its values at large enough arguments, up to that positive real. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝑋) < (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsupgt 46130*	Given a sequence of real numbers, there exists an upper part of the sequence that's appxoximated from below by the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝑋) < (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfresre 46131	The inferior limit of a function only depends on the real part of its domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ ℝ)) = (lim inf‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfresicompt 46132*	The inferior limit doesn't change when a function is restricted to the upper part of the reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀[,)+∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑍) ↦ 𝐵)) = (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)))
Theorem	liminfltlimsupex 46133	An example where the lim inf is strictly smaller than the lim sup. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (lim inf‘𝐹) < (lim sup‘𝐹)
Theorem	liminfgelimsup 46134*	The inferior limit is greater than or equal to the superior limit if and only if they are equal. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ (𝑘[,)+∞)((𝐹 “ (𝑗[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹) ↔ (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹)))
Theorem	liminfvalxr 46135*	Alternate definition of lim inf when 𝐹 is an extended real-valued function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝑒(𝐹‘𝑥))))
Theorem	liminfresuz 46136	If the real part of the domain of a function is a subset of the integers, the inferior limit doesn't change when the function is restricted to an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐹 ↾ ℝ) ⊆ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim inf‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminflelimsupuz 46137	The superior limit is greater than or equal to the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfvalxrmpt 46138*	Alternate definition of lim inf when 𝐹 is an extended real-valued function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝑒𝐵)))
Theorem	liminfresuz2 46139	If the domain of a function is a subset of the integers, the inferior limit doesn't change when the function is restricted to an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim inf‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfgelimsupuz 46140	The inferior limit is greater than or equal to the superior limit if and only if they are equal. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹) ↔ (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹)))
Theorem	liminfval4 46141*	Alternate definition of lim inf when the given function is eventually real-valued. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝑀[,)+∞))) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵)))
Theorem	liminfval3 46142*	Alternate definition of lim inf when the given function is eventually extended real-valued. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝑀[,)+∞))) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝑒𝐵)))
Theorem	liminfequzmpt2 46143*	Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (lim inf‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)))
Theorem	liminfvaluz 46144*	Alternate definition of lim inf for an extended real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -𝑒𝐵)))
Theorem	liminf0 46145	The inferior limit of the empty set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (lim inf‘∅) = +∞
Theorem	limsupval4 46146*	Alternate definition of lim inf when the given a function is eventually extended real-valued. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝑀[,)+∞))) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝑒𝐵)))
Theorem	liminfvaluz2 46147*	Alternate definition of lim inf for a real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -𝐵)))
Theorem	liminfvaluz3 46148*	Alternate definition of lim inf for an extended real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -𝑒(𝐹‘𝑘))))
Theorem	liminflelimsupcex 46149	A counterexample for liminflelimsup 46128, showing that the second hypothesis is needed. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (lim sup‘∅) < (lim inf‘∅)
Theorem	limsupvaluz3 46150*	Alternate definition of lim inf for an extended real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim inf‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -𝑒𝐵)))
Theorem	liminfvaluz4 46151*	Alternate definition of lim inf for a real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -(𝐹‘𝑘))))
Theorem	limsupvaluz4 46152*	Alternate definition of lim inf for a real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim inf‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -𝐵)))
Theorem	climliminflimsupd 46153	If a sequence of real numbers converges, its inferior limit and its superior limit are equal. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfreuzlem 46154*	Given a function on the reals, its inferior limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is greater than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is smaller than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗))))
Theorem	liminfreuz 46155*	Given a function on the reals, its inferior limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is greater than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is smaller than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗))))
Theorem	liminfltlem 46156*	Given a sequence of real numbers, there exists an upper part of the sequence that's approximated from above by the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(lim inf‘𝐹) < ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑋))
Theorem	liminflt 46157*	Given a sequence of real numbers, there exists an upper part of the sequence that's approximated from above by the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(lim inf‘𝐹) < ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑋))
Theorem	climliminf 46158	A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if it converges to its inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ (lim inf‘𝐹)))
Theorem	liminflimsupclim 46159	A sequence of real numbers converges if its inferior limit is real, and it is greater than or equal to the superior limit (in such a case, they are actually equal, see liminflelimsupuz 46137). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	climliminflimsup 46160	A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if its inferior limit is real and it is greater than or equal to its superior limit (in such a case, they are actually equal, see liminfgelimsupuz 46140). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ((lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹))))
Theorem	climliminflimsup2 46161	A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if its superior limit is real and it is less than or equal to its inferior limit (in such a case, they are actually equal, see liminfgelimsupuz 46140). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹))))
Theorem	climliminflimsup3 46162	A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if its inferior limit is real and equal to its superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ((lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹))))
Theorem	climliminflimsup4 46163	A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if its superior limit is real and equal to its inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹))))
Theorem	limsupub2 46164*	A extended real valued function, with limsup that is not +∞, is eventually less than +∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≠ +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) < +∞))
Theorem	limsupubuz2 46165*	A sequence with values in the extended reals, and with limsup that is not +∞, is eventually less than +∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≠ +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) < +∞)
Theorem	xlimpnfxnegmnf 46166*	A sequence converges to +∞ if and only if its negation converges to -∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)-𝑒(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	liminflbuz2 46167*	A sequence with values in the extended reals, and with liminf that is not -∞, is eventually greater than -∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≠ -∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)-∞ < (𝐹‘𝑗))
Theorem	liminfpnfuz 46168*	The inferior limit of a function is +∞ if and only if every real number is the lower bound of the restriction of the function to a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim inf‘𝐹) = +∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)))
Theorem	liminflimsupxrre 46169*	A sequence with values in the extended reals, and with real liminf and limsup, is eventually real. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≠ +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≠ -∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)):(ℤ≥‘𝑘)⟶ℝ)
21.43.7.2  Limits for sequences of extended real numbers Textbooks generally use a single symbol to denote the limit of a sequence of real numbers. But then, three distinct definitions are usually given: one for the case of convergence to a real number, one for the case of limit to +∞ and one for the case of limit to -∞. It turns out that these three definitions can be expressed as the limit w.r.t. to the standard topology on the extended reals. In this section, a relation ~~>* is defined that captures all three definitions (and can be applied to sequences of extended reals, also), see dfxlim2 46200.
Syntax	clsxlim 46170	Extend class notation with convergence relation for limits in the extended real numbers.
class ~~>*
Definition	df-xlim 46171	Define the convergence relation for extended real sequences. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ~~>* = (⇝𝑡‘(ordTop‘ ≤ ))
Theorem	xlimrel 46172	The limit on extended reals is a relation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Rel ~~>*
Theorem	xlimres 46173	A function converges iff its restriction to an upper integers set converges. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (ℝ* ↑pm ℂ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*𝐴 ↔ (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))~~>*𝐴))
Theorem	xlimcl 46174	The limit of a sequence of extended real numbers is an extended real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹~~>*𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	rexlimddv2 46175*	Restricted existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	xlimclim 46176	Given a sequence of reals, it converges to a real number 𝐴 w.r.t. the standard topology on the reals, if and only if it converges to 𝐴 w.r.t. to the standard topology on the extended reals (see climreeq 45967). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	xlimconst 46177*	A constant sequence converges to its value, w.r.t. the standard topology on the extended reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹~~>*𝐴)
Theorem	climxlim 46178	A converging sequence in the reals is a converging sequence in the extended reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹~~>*𝐴)
Theorem	xlimbr 46179*	Express the binary relation "sequence 𝐹 converges to point 𝑃 " w.r.t. the standard topology on the extended reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (ordTop‘ ≤ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*𝑃 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ ℝ* ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑃 ∈ 𝑢 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝑘 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑢)))))
Theorem	fuzxrpmcn 46180	A function mapping from an upper set of integers to the extended reals is a partial map on the complex numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (ℝ* ↑pm ℂ))
Theorem	cnrefiisplem 46181*	Lemma for cnrefiisp 46182 (some local definitions are used). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (ℝ ∪ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ({(abs‘(ℑ‘𝐴))} ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐵 ∩ ℂ) ∖ {𝐴}){(abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴))})    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = inf(𝐷, ℝ*, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ((𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ≤ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴))))
Theorem	cnrefiisp 46182*	A non-real, complex number is an isolated point w.r.t. the union of the reals with any finite set (the extended reals is an example of such a union). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (ℝ ∪ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ((𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ≤ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴))))
Theorem	xlimxrre 46183*	If a sequence ranging over the extended reals converges w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers, then there exists an upper set of the integers over which the function is real-valued (the weaker hypothesis 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ is probably not enough, since in principle we could have +∞ ∈ ℂ and -∞ ∈ ℂ). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹~~>*𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶ℝ)
Theorem	xlimmnfvlem1 46184*	Lemma for xlimmnfv 46186: the "only if" part of the biconditional. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹~~>*-∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	xlimmnfvlem2 46185*	Lemma for xlimmnf 46193: the "if" part of the biconditional. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐹‘𝑘) < 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹~~>*-∞)
Theorem	xlimmnfv 46186*	A function converges to minus infinity if it eventually becomes (and stays) smaller than any given real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*-∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	xlimconst2 46187*	A sequence that eventually becomes constant, converges to its constant value (w.r.t. the standard topology on the extended reals). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹~~>*𝐴)
Theorem	xlimpnfvlem1 46188*	Lemma for xlimpnfv 46190: the "only if" part of the biconditional. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹~~>*+∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)𝑋 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))
Theorem	xlimpnfvlem2 46189*	Lemma for xlimpnfv 46190: the "if" part of the biconditional. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)𝑥 < (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹~~>*+∞)
Theorem	xlimpnfv 46190*	A function converges to plus infinity if it eventually becomes (and stays) larger than any given real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*+∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)))
Theorem	xlimclim2lem 46191*	Lemma for xlimclim2 46192. Here it is additionally assumed that the sequence will eventually become (and stay) real. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	xlimclim2 46192	Given a sequence of extended reals, it converges to a real number 𝐴 w.r.t. the standard topology on the reals (see climreeq 45967), if and only if it converges to 𝐴 w.r.t. to the standard topology on the extended reals. In order for the first part of the statement to even make sense, the sequence will of course eventually become (and stay) real: showing this, is the key step of the proof. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	xlimmnf 46193*	A function converges to minus infinity if it eventually becomes (and stays) smaller than any given real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*-∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	xlimpnf 46194*	A function converges to plus infinity if it eventually becomes (and stays) larger than any given real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*+∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)))
Theorem	xlimmnfmpt 46195*	A function converges to plus infinity if it eventually becomes (and stays) larger than any given real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*-∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)𝐵 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	xlimpnfmpt 46196*	A function converges to plus infinity if it eventually becomes (and stays) larger than any given real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*+∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)𝑥 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	climxlim2lem 46197	In this lemma for climxlim2 46198 there is the additional assumption that the converging function is complex-valued on the whole domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹~~>*𝐴)
Theorem	climxlim2 46198	A sequence of extended reals, converging w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers is a converging sequence w.r.t. the standard topology on the extended reals. This is non-trivial, because +∞ and -∞ could, in principle, be complex numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹~~>*𝐴)
Theorem	dfxlim2v 46199*	An alternative definition for the convergence relation in the extended real numbers. This resembles what's found in most textbooks: three distinct definitions for the same symbol (limit of a sequence). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*𝐴 ↔ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ∨ (𝐴 = -∞ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ 𝑥) ∨ (𝐴 = +∞ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)))))
Theorem	dfxlim2 46200*	An alternative definition for the convergence relation in the extended real numbers. This resembles what's found in most textbooks: three distinct definitions for the same symbol (limit of a sequence). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹~~>*𝐴 ↔ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ∨ (𝐴 = -∞ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ 𝑥) ∨ (𝐴 = +∞ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)))))