Theorem r19.29d2r 3261

Description: Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with two restricted quantifiers, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
r19.29d2r.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
r19.29d2r.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r19.29d2r	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem r19.29d2r

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r19.29d2r.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
2		r19.29d2r.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
3	1, 2	jca 511	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4		2r19.29 3260	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
5	3, 4	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wral 3063  ∃wrex 3064

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-ex 1784  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069

This theorem is referenced by:  ucnima  23341  tgisline  26892  r19.29ffa  30723  xrofsup  30992  icoreresf  35450  sn-negex12  40319