P. 32 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3101-3200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	r19.29r 3101	Restricted quantifier version of 19.29r 1876; variation of r19.29 3100. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.29imd 3102	Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with an implication in the hypothesis containing the generalization, deduction version. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	r19.40 3103	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.40 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.30 3104	Restricted quantifier version of 19.30 1883. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.43 3105	Restricted quantifier version of 19.43 1884. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	3r19.43 3106	Restricted quantifier version of 19.43 1884 for a triple disjunction . (Contributed by AV, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	2ralimi 3107	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent two times, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	3ralimi 3108	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent three times, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓)
Theorem	4ralimi 3109	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent four times, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓)
Theorem	5ralimi 3110	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent five times, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐸 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐸 𝜓)
Theorem	6ralimi 3111	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent six times, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐸 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐹 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐸 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐹 𝜓)
Theorem	2ralbii 3112	Inference adding two restricted universal quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	2rexbii 3113	Inference adding two restricted existential quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	3ralbii 3114	Inference adding three restricted universal quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓)
Theorem	4ralbii 3115	Inference adding four restricted universal quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓)
Theorem	2ralbiim 3116	Split a biconditional and distribute two restricted universal quantifiers, analogous to 2albiim 1892 and ralbiim 3099. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	ralnex2 3117	Relationship between two restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-May-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	ralnex3 3118	Relationship between three restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-May-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑)
Theorem	rexnal2 3119	Relationship between two restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	rexnal3 3120	Relationship between three restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑)
Theorem	nrexralim 3121	Negation of a complex predicate calculus formula. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.26-2 3122	Restricted quantifier version of 19.26-2 1873. Version of r19.26 3097 with two quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	2r19.29 3123	Theorem r19.29 3100 with two quantifiers. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 25-Sep-2010.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.29d2r 3124	Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with two restricted quantifiers, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	r2allem 3125	Lemma factoring out common proof steps of r2alf 3258 and r2al 3173. Introduced to reduce dependencies on axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
Theorem	r2exlem 3126	Lemma factoring out common proof steps in r2exf 3259 an r2ex 3174. Introduced to reduce dependencies on axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	hbralrimi 3127	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). This theorem contains the common proof steps for ralrimi 3235 and ralrimiv 3128. Its main advantage over these two is its minimal references to axioms. The proof is extracted from NM's previous work. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimiv 3128*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimiva 3129*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rexlimiva 3130*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2006.) Shorten dependent theorems. (Revised by Wolf lammen, 23-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	rexlimiv 3131*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	nrexdv 3132*	Deduction adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimivw 3133*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rexlimivw 3134*	Weaker version of rexlimiv 3131. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimdv 3135*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 28-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdv 3136*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 22-Dec-2006.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	ralrimdva 3137*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdva 3138*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdvaa 3139*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdva2 3140*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	r19.29an 3141*	A commonly used pattern in the spirit of r19.29 3100. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	rexlimdv3a 3142*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). Frequently-used variant of rexlimdv 3136. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdvw 3143*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimddv 3144*	Restricted existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	r19.29a 3145*	A commonly used pattern in the spirit of r19.29 3100. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Nov-2017.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	ralimdv2 3146*	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	reximdv2 3147*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	reximdvai 3148*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimdva 3149*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reximdva 3150*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimdv 3151*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 (alim 1812). (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reximdv 3152*	Deduction from Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with strong hypothesis.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reximddv 3153*	Deduction from Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)
Theorem	reximddv3 3154*	Deduction from Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)
Theorem	reximssdv 3155*	Derivation of a restricted existential quantification over a subset (the second hypothesis implies 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵), deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)
Theorem	ralbidv2 3156*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1997.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexbidv2 3157*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	ralbidva 3158*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	rexbidva 3159*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralbidv 3160*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	rexbidv 3161*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	r19.21v 3162*	Restricted quantifier version of 19.21v 1941. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.37v 3163*	Restricted quantifier version of one direction of 19.37v 1999. (The other direction holds iff 𝐴 is nonempty, see r19.37zv 4461.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.23v 3164*	Restricted quantifier version of 19.23v 1944. Version of r19.23 3234 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.36v 3165*	Restricted quantifier version of one direction of 19.36 2238. (The other direction holds iff 𝐴 is nonempty, see r19.36zv 4466.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.27v 3166*	Restricted quantitifer version of one direction of 19.27 2235. (Assuming Ⅎ𝑥𝐴, the other direction holds when 𝐴 is nonempty, see r19.27zv 4465.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.41v 3167*	Restricted quantifier version 19.41v 1951. Version of r19.41 3241 with a disjoint variable condition, requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2003.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.28v 3168*	Restricted quantifier version of one direction of 19.28 2236. (Assuming Ⅎ𝑥𝐴, the other direction holds when 𝐴 is nonempty, see r19.28zv 4460.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.42v 3169*	Restricted quantifier version of 19.42v 1955 (see also 19.42 2244). (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.32v 3170*	Restricted quantifier version of 19.32v 1942. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.45v 3171*	Restricted quantifier version of one direction of 19.45 2246. The other direction holds when 𝐴 is nonempty, see r19.45zv 4462. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.44v 3172*	One direction of a restricted quantifier version of 19.44 2245. The other direction holds when 𝐴 is nonempty, see r19.44zv 4463. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	r2al 3173*	Double restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
Theorem	r2ex 3174*	Double restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	r3al 3175*	Triple restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑))
Theorem	r3ex 3176*	Triple existential quantification. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	rgen2 3177*	Generalization rule for restricted quantification, with two quantifiers. This theorem should be used in place of rgen2a 3342 since it depends on a smaller set of axioms. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	ralrimivv 3178*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexlimivv 3179*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimivva 3180*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimdvv 3181*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rgen3 3182*	Generalization rule for restricted quantification, with three quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2008.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑
Theorem	ralrimivvva 3183*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with triple quantification.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimdvva 3184*	Deduction doubly quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 (alim 1812). (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	reximdvva 3185*	Deduction doubly quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimdvv 3186*	Deduction doubly quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Mar-2025.) Shorten and reduce DV conditions. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 18-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimdvvOLD 3187*	Obsolete version of ralimdvv 3186 as of 18-Nov-2025. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Mar-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimd4v 3188*	Deduction quadrupally quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Mar-2025.) Reduce DV conditions. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 18-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimd4vOLD 3189*	Obsolete version of ralimd4v 3188 as of 18-Nov-2025. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Mar-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimd6v 3190*	Deduction sextupally quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.) Reduce DV conditions. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 18-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐸 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐹 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐸 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐹 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimd6vOLD 3191*	Obsolete version of ralimdvv 3186 as of 18-Nov-2025. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Mar-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐸 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐹 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐸 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐹 𝜒))
Theorem	ralrimdvva 3192*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2008.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdvv 3193*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdvva 3194*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rexlimdvvva 3195*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90, for three restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by AV, 23-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	reximddv2 3196*	Double deduction from Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	r19.29vva 3197*	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 3100, version with two restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Nov-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	2rexbiia 3198*	Inference adding two restricted existential quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	2ralbidva 3199*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	2rexbidva 3200*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))