P. 32 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3101-3200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ralimdv2 3101*	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimdva 3102*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimdv 3103*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 (alim 1814). (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimdvva 3104*	Deduction doubly quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 (alim 1814). (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	hbralrimi 3105	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). This theorem contains the common proof steps for ralrimi 3139 and ralrimiv 3106. Its main advantage over these two is its minimal references to axioms. The proof is extracted from NM's previous work. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimiv 3106*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimiva 3107*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimivw 3108*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	r19.27v 3109*	Restricted quantitifer version of one direction of 19.27 2223. (Assuming Ⅎ𝑥𝐴, the other direction holds when 𝐴 is nonempty, see r19.27zv 4433.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.28v 3110*	Restricted quantifier version of one direction of 19.28 2224. (Assuming Ⅎ𝑥𝐴, the other direction holds when 𝐴 is nonempty, see r19.28zv 4428.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	ralrimdv 3111*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 28-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralrimdva 3112*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralrimivv 3113*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimivva 3114*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimivvva 3115*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with triple quantification.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimdvv 3116*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	ralrimdvva 3117*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2008.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	ralbidv2 3118*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1997.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	ralbidva 3119*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralbidv 3120*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	2ralbidva 3121*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	2ralbidv 3122*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Szymon Jaroszewicz, 16-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	r2allem 3123	Lemma factoring out common proof steps of r2alf 3145 and r2al 3124. Introduced to reduce dependencies on axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
Theorem	r2al 3124*	Double restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
Theorem	r3al 3125*	Triple restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑))
Theorem	rgen2 3126*	Generalization rule for restricted quantification, with two quantifiers. This theorem should be used in place of rgen2a 3155 since it depends on a smaller set of axioms. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	rgen3 3127*	Generalization rule for restricted quantification, with three quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2008.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑
Theorem	rspw 3128*	Restricted specialization. Weak version of rsp 3129, requiring ax-8 2110, but not ax-12 2173. (Contributed by Gino Giotto, 3-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
Theorem	rsp 3129	Restricted specialization. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
Theorem	rspa 3130	Restricted specialization. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)
Theorem	rspec 3131	Specialization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)
Theorem	r19.21bi 3132	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)
Theorem	r19.21be 3133	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	rspec2 3134	Specialization rule for restricted quantification, with two quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑)
Theorem	rspec3 3135	Specialization rule for restricted quantification, with three quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑)
Theorem	rsp2 3136	Restricted specialization, with two quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1997.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
Theorem	r19.21t 3137	Restricted quantifier version of 19.21t 2202; closed form of r19.21 3138. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))
Theorem	r19.21 3138	Restricted quantifier version of 19.21 2203. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Mar-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ralrimi 3139	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-1999.) Shortened after introduction of hbralrimi 3105. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimdaa 3140	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralrimd 3141	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	nfra1 3142	The setvar 𝑥 is not free in ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	hbra1 3143	The setvar 𝑥 is not free in ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	hbral 3144	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 13-Dec-2009.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	r2alf 3145*	Double restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) Use r2allem 3123. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jan-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
Theorem	nfraldw 3146*	Deduction version of nfralw 3149. Version of nfrald 3148 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 24-Sep-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfraldwOLD 3147*	Obsolete version of nfraldw 3146 as of 24-Sep-2024. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfrald 3148	Deduction version of nfral 3150. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker nfraldw 3146 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfralw 3149*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. Version of nfral 3150 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfral 3150	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker nfralw 3149 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfra2w 3151*	Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except the quantification of the antecedent is restricted. Derived automatically from hbra2VD 42369. Version of nfra2 3154 with a disjoint variable condition not requiring ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 24-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	nfra2wOLD 3152*	Obsolete version of nfra2w 3151 as of 31-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 24-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	nfra2wOLDOLD 3153*	Obsolete version of nfra2w 3151 as of 24-Sep-2024. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	nfra2 3154*	Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except the quantification of the antecedent is restricted. Derived automatically from hbra2VD 42369. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker nfra2w 3151 when possible. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	rgen2a 3155*	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 are not required to be disjoint. This proof illustrates the use of dvelim 2451. This theorem relies on the full set of axioms up to ax-ext 2709 and it should no longer be used. Usage of rgen2 3126 is highly encouraged. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	ralbida 3156	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralbidaOLD 3157	Obsolete version of ralbida 3156 as of 31-Oct-2024. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralbid 3158	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1998.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	2ralbida 3159*	Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	raleqbii 3160	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier, changing both formula and quantifier domain. Inference form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	ralcom4 3161*	Commutation of restricted and unrestricted universal quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) Reduce axiom dependencies. (Revised by BJ, 13-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ralcom4OLD 3162*	Obsolete version of ralcom4 3161 as of 31-Oct-2024. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) Reduce axiom dependencies. (Revised by BJ, 13-Jun-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ralnex 3163	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	dfral2 3164	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) Allow shortening of rexnal 3165. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	rexnal 3165	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	dfrex2 3166	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	rexex 3167	Restricted existence implies existence. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rexim 3168	Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexbi 3169	Distribute restricted quantification over a biconditional. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexbiOLD 3170	Obsolete version of rexbi 3169 as of 31-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	reximi2 3171	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	reximia 3172	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reximiaOLD 3173	Obsolete version of reximia 3172 as of 31-Oct-2024. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reximi 3174	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rexbii2 3175	Inference adding different restricted existential quantifiers to each side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexbiia 3176	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rexbii 3177	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	2rexbii 3178	Inference adding two restricted existential quantifiers to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexcom4 3179*	Commutation of restricted and unrestricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) Reduce axiom dependencies. (Revised by BJ, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	2ex2rexrot 3180*	Rotate two existential quantifiers and two restricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by AV, 9-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	rexcom4a 3181*	Specialized existential commutation lemma. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	rexanid 3182	Cancellation law for restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-May-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	r19.29 3183	Restricted quantifier version of 19.29 1877. See also r19.29r 3184. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.29r 3184	Restricted quantifier version of 19.29r 1878; variation of r19.29 3183. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.29imd 3185	Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with an implication in the hypothesis containing the generalization, deduction version. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	rexnal2 3186	Relationship between two restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	rexnal3 3187	Relationship between three restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑)
Theorem	ralnex2 3188	Relationship between two restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-May-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	ralnex3 3189	Relationship between three restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-May-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑)
Theorem	ralinexa 3190	A transformation of restricted quantifiers and logical connectives. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	rexanali 3191	A transformation of restricted quantifiers and logical connectives. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	nrexralim 3192	Negation of a complex predicate calculus formula. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	risset 3193*	Two ways to say "𝐴 belongs to 𝐵". (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	nelb 3194*	A definition of ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	nelbOLD 3195*	Obsolete version of nelb 3194 as of 3-Nov-2024. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	nrex 3196	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓
Theorem	nrexdv 3197*	Deduction adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reximdv2 3198*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	reximdvai 3199*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jan-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reximdvaiOLD 3200*	Obsolete version of reximdvai 3199 as of 3-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jan-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))