Theorem rabeqd 3421

Description: Deduction form of rabeq 3407. Note that contrary to rabeq 3407 it has no disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqd.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rabeqd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqd	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem rabeqd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqd.nf	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rabeqd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
3		eleq2 2818	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	anbi1d 631	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
5	2, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
6	1, 5	rabbida4 3418	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541  Ⅎwnf 1784   ∈ wcel 2110  {crab 3393

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-12 2179  ax-ext 2702

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-rab 3394

This theorem is referenced by:  rabeqbida  3422  bj-rabeqbid  36934  bj-inrab2  36941  smfinfmpt  46836