Theorem rabeqd 3436

Description: Deduction form of rabeq 3422. Note that contrary to rabeq 3422 it has no disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqd.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rabeqd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqd	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem rabeqd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqd.nf	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rabeqd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
3		eleq2 2845	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	anbi1d 639	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
5	2, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
6	1, 5	rabbida4 3433	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1554  Ⅎwnf 1797   ∈ wcel 2136  {crab 3408

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1809  ax-4 1823  ax-5 1924  ax-6 1981  ax-7 2022  ax-8 2138  ax-9 2146  ax-12 2206  ax-ext 2728

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1794  df-nf 1798  df-sb 2085  df-clab 2735  df-cleq 2748  df-clel 2831  df-rab 3409

This theorem is referenced by:  rabeqbida  3437  bj-rabeqbid  37354  bj-inrab2  37361  smfinfmpt  47341