Theorem rabeqd 3420

Description: Deduction form of rabeq 3406. Note that contrary to rabeq 3406 it has no disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqd.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rabeqd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqd	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem rabeqd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqd.nf	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rabeqd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
3		eleq2 2829	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	anbi1d 637	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
5	2, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
6	1, 5	rabbida4 3417	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1547  Ⅎwnf 1790   ∈ wcel 2119  {crab 3392

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2712

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2719  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2815  df-rab 3393

This theorem is referenced by:  rabeqbida  3421  bj-rabeqbid  37275  bj-inrab2  37282  smfinfmpt  47263