P. 35 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3401-3500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rabeqcda 3401*	When 𝜓 is always true in a context, a restricted class abstraction is equal to the restricting class. Deduction form of rabeqc 3402. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)
Theorem	rabeqc 3402*	A restricted class abstraction equals the restricting class if its condition follows from the membership of the free setvar variable in the restricting class. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2022.) (Proof shortened by SN, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴
Theorem	rabeqi 3403	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions. Inference form of rabeqf 3424. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	rabeq 3404*	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	rabeqdv 3405*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. Deduction form of rabeq 3404. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	rabeqbidva 3406*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) Remove DV conditions. (Revised by GG, 1-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabeqbidvaOLD 3407*	Obsolete version of rabeqbidva 3406 as of 1-Sep-2025. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabeqbidv 3408*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Dec-2009.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabrabi 3409*	Abstract builder restricted to another restricted abstract builder with implicit substitution. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2022.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163 and ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	nfrab1 3410	The abstraction variable in a restricted class abstraction isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	rabid 3411	An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	rabidim1 3412	Membership in a restricted abstraction, implication. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	reqabi 3413	Inference from equality of a class variable and a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	rabrab 3414	Abstract builder restricted to another restricted abstract builder. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Aug-2017.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	rabbida4 3415	Version of rabbidva2 3392 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbida 3416	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). Version of rabbidva 3396 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Mar-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbid 3417	Version of rabbidv 3397 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabeqd 3418	Deduction form of rabeq 3404. Note that contrary to rabeq 3404 it has no disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	rabeqbida 3419	Version of rabeqbidva 3406 with two disjoint variable conditions removed and the third replaced by a nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbi 3420	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Closed theorem form of rabbii 3395. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabid2f 3421	An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rabid2im 3422*	One direction of rabid2 3423 is based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 26-May-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	rabid2 3423*	An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. Prefer rabid2im 3422 if one direction is sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rabeqf 3424	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	cbvrabw 3425*	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrab 3429 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2377. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2377. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-10 2147. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvrabwOLD 3426*	Obsolete version of cbvrabw 3425 as of 19-Jul-2025. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2377. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	nfrabw 3427*	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. Version of nfrab 3428 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2377. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) Avoid ax-13 2377. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfrab 3428	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2377. Use the weaker nfrabw 3427 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	cbvrab 3429	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2377. Use the weaker cbvrabw 3425 when possible. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
2.1.6  The universal class
Syntax	cvv 3430	Extend class notation to include the universal class symbol.
class V
Theorem	vjust 3431	Justification theorem for df-v 3432. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑥} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝑦}
Definition	df-v 3432	Define the universal class. Definition 5.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. Also Definition 2.9 of [Quine] p. 19. The class V can be described as the "class of all sets"; vprc 5252 proves that V is not itself a set in ZF. We will frequently use the expression 𝐴 ∈ V as a short way to say "𝐴 is a set", and isset 3444 proves that this expression has the same meaning as ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝐴. In well-founded set theories without urelements, like ZF, the class V is equal to the von Neumann universe. However, the letter "V" does not stand for "von Neumann". The letter "V" was used earlier by Peano in 1889 for the universe of sets, where the letter V is derived from the Latin word "Verum", referring to the true truth constant 𝑇. Peano's notation V was adopted by Whitehead and Russell in Principia Mathematica for the class of all sets in 1910. The class constant V is the first class constant introduced in this database. As a constant, as opposed to a variable, it cannot be substituted with anything, and in particular it is not part of any disjoint variable condition. For a general discussion of the theory of classes, see mmset.html#class 3444. See dfv2 3433 for an alternate definition. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ V = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑥}
Theorem	dfv2 3433	Alternate definition of the universal class (see df-v 3432). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
⊢ V = {𝑥 ∣ ⊤}
Theorem	vex 3434	All setvar variables are sets (see isset 3444). Theorem 6.8 of [Quine] p. 43. A shorter proof is possible from eleq2i 2829 but it uses more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) Remove use of ax-12 2185. (Revised by SN, 28-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
Theorem	elv 3435	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3434), then it is true. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	elvd 3436	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3434) and another antecedent, then it is implied by that other antecedent. Deduction associated with elv 3435. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	el2v 3437	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V and 𝑦 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3434), then it is true. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	el3v 3438	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V and 𝑧 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3434), then it is true. Inference forms (with ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V, ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V and ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V hypotheses) of the general theorems (proving ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → assertions) may be superfluous. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	el3v3 3439	If a proposition is implied by 𝑧 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3434) and two other antecedents, then it is implied by these other antecedents. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
Theorem	eqv 3440*	The universe contains every set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2006.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-13 2377. (Revised by BJ, 10-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 = V ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvf 3441	The universe contains every set. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = V ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	abv 3442	The class of sets verifying a property is the universal class if and only if that property is a tautology. The reverse implication (bj-abv 37229) requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2021.) Avoid df-clel 2812, ax-8 2116. (Revised by GG, 30-Aug-2024.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 30-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = V ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	abvALT 3443	Alternate proof of abv 3442, shorter but using more axioms. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = V ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	isset 3444*	Two ways to express that "𝐴 is a set": A class 𝐴 is a member of the universal class V (see df-v 3432) if and only if the class 𝐴 exists (i.e., there exists some set 𝑥 equal to class 𝐴). Theorem 6.9 of [Quine] p. 43. A class 𝐴 which is not a set is called a proper class. Conventions: We will often use the expression "𝐴 ∈ V " to mean "𝐴 is a set", for example in uniex 7688. To make some theorems more readily applicable, we will also use the more general expression 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 instead of 𝐴 ∈ V to mean "𝐴 is a set", typically in an antecedent, or in a hypothesis for theorems in deduction form (see for instance uniexg 7687 compared with uniex 7688). That this is more general is seen either by substitution (when the variable 𝑉 has no other occurrences), or by elex 3451. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	cbvexeqsetf 3445*	The expression ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝐴 means "𝐴 is a set" even if 𝐴 contains 𝑥 as a bound variable. This lemma helps minimizing axiom or df-clab 2716 usage in some cases. Extracted from the proof of issetft 3446. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴))
Theorem	issetft 3446	Closed theorem form of isset 3444 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. Extracted from the proof of vtoclgft 3498. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))
Theorem	issetf 3447	A version of isset 3444 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	isseti 3448*	A way to say "𝐴 is a set" (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.) Remove dependencies on axioms. (Revised by BJ, 13-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴
Theorem	issetri 3449*	A way to say "𝐴 is a set" (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	eqvisset 3450	A class equal to a variable is a set. Note the absence of disjoint variable condition, contrary to isset 3444 and issetri 3449. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elex 3451	If a class is a member of another class, then it is a set. Theorem 6.12 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elexOLD 3452	Obsolete version of elex 3451 as of 28-May-2025. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elexi 3453	If a class is a member of another class, then it is a set. Inference associated with elex 3451. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	elexd 3454	If a class is a member of another class, then it is a set. Deduction associated with elex 3451. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elex22 3455*	If two classes each contain another class, then both contain some set. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	prcnel 3456	A proper class doesn't belong to any class. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	ralv 3457	A universal quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rexv 3458	An existential quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	reuv 3459	A unique existential quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rmov 3460	An at-most-one quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rabab 3461	A class abstraction restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ V ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	rexcom4b 3462*	Specialized existential commutation lemma. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ceqsal1t 3463	One direction of ceqsalt 3464 is based on fewer assumptions and fewer axioms. It is at the same time the reverse direction of vtoclgft 3498. Extracted from a proof of ceqsalt 3464. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	ceqsalt 3464*	Closed theorem version of ceqsalg 3466. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsralt 3465*	Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalt 3464. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsalg 3466*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. For an alternate proof, see ceqsalgALT 3467. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsalgALT 3467*	Alternate proof of ceqsalg 3466, not using ceqsalt 3464. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Revised by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsal 3468*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) Avoid df-clab 2716. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsalALT 3469*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. Shorter proof uses df-clab 2716. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsalv 3470*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) Avoid ax-12 2185. (Revised by SN, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsralv 3471*	Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalv 3470. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2013.) Avoid ax-9 2124, ax-12 2185, ax-ext 2709. (Revised by SN, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	gencl 3472*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜓)
Theorem	2gencl 3473*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 𝐵 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐷 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜒)
Theorem	3gencl 3474*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 𝐵 = 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑅 𝐶 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐷 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐹 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐺 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑅) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜃)
Theorem	cgsexg 3475*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-2007.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	cgsex2g 3476*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	cgsex4g 3477*	An implicit substitution inference for 4 general classes. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1995.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) Avoid ax-9 2124, ax-ext 2709. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 21-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsex 3478*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsexv 3479*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) Avoid ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsexv2d 3480*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) Shorten, reduce dv conditions. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jun-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑
Theorem	ceqsexv2dOLD 3481*	Obsolete version of ceqsexv2d 3480 as of 5-Jun-2025. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑
Theorem	ceqsex2 3482*	Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	ceqsex2v 3483*	Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.) Avoid ax-10 2147 and ax-11 2163. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	ceqsex3v 3484*	Elimination of three existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜃)
Theorem	ceqsex4v 3485*	Elimination of four existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜏)
Theorem	ceqsex6v 3486*	Elimination of six existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐸 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝐹 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ∧ (𝑤 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝐹) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜁)
Theorem	ceqsex8v 3487*	Elimination of eight existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐸 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝐹 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝐺 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝐻 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜌))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡∃𝑠(((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) ∧ ((𝑣 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝐹) ∧ (𝑡 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑠 = 𝐻)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜌)
Theorem	gencbvex 3488*	Change of bound variable using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝜃 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	gencbvex2 3489*	Restatement of gencbvex 3488 with weaker hypotheses. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 6-Dec-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → ∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝜃 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	gencbval 3490*	Change of bound variable using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜒 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝜃 → 𝜓))
Theorem	sbhypf 3491*	Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See also csbhypf 3866. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	spcimgft 3492	Closed theorem form of spcimgf 3496. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	spcimgfi1 3493	A closed version of spcimgf 3496. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	spcimgfi1OLD 3494	Obsolete version of spcimgfi1 3493 as of 27-Jul-2025. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	spcgft 3495	A closed version of spcgf 3534. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	spcimgf 3496	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	spcimegf 3497	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	vtoclgft 3498	Closed theorem form of vtoclgf 3514. The reverse implication is proven in ceqsal1t 3463. See ceqsalt 3464 for a version with 𝑥 and 𝐴 disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 11-Aug-2021.) Avoid ax-13 2377. (Revised by GG, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ∧ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜓)
Theorem	vtocleg 3499*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜑)
Theorem	vtoclg 3500*	Implicit substitution of a class expression for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-Apr-1995.) Avoid ax-12 2185. (Revised by SN, 20-Apr-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓)