P. 35 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3401-3500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rabswap 3401	Swap with a membership relation in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2005.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	cbvrabv 3402*	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.) Require 𝑥, 𝑦 be disjoint to avoid ax-11 2168 and ax-13 2380. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	rabeqcda 3403*	When 𝜓 is always true in a context, a restricted class abstraction is equal to the restricting class. Deduction form of rabeqc 3404. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)
Theorem	rabeqc 3404*	A restricted class abstraction equals the restricting class if its condition follows from the membership of the free setvar variable in the restricting class. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2022.) (Proof shortened by SN, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴
Theorem	rabeqi 3405	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions. Inference form of rabeqf 3426. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168, ax-12 2189. (Revised by GG, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	rabeq 3406*	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168, ax-12 2189. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	rabeqdv 3407*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. Deduction form of rabeq 3406. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	rabeqbidva 3408*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) Remove DV conditions. (Revised by GG, 1-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabeqbidvaOLD 3409*	Obsolete version of rabeqbidva 3408 as of 1-Sep-2025. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabeqbidv 3410*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Dec-2009.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabrabi 3411*	Abstract builder restricted to another restricted abstract builder with implicit substitution. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2022.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168 and ax-12 2189. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	nfrab1 3412	The abstraction variable in a restricted class abstraction isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	rabid 3413	An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	rabidim1 3414	Membership in a restricted abstraction, implication. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	reqabi 3415	Inference from equality of a class variable and a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	rabrab 3416	Abstract builder restricted to another restricted abstract builder. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Aug-2017.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	rabbida4 3417	Version of rabbidva2 3394 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbida 3418	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). Version of rabbidva 3398 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Mar-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbid 3419	Version of rabbidv 3399 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabeqd 3420	Deduction form of rabeq 3406. Note that contrary to rabeq 3406 it has no disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	rabeqbida 3421	Version of rabeqbidva 3408 with two disjoint variable conditions removed and the third replaced by a nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbi 3422	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Closed theorem form of rabbii 3397. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabid2f 3423	An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rabid2im 3424*	One direction of rabid2 3425 is based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 26-May-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	rabid2 3425*	An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. Prefer rabid2im 3424 if one direction is sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rabeqf 3426	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	cbvrabw 3427*	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrab 3431 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2380. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2380. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-10 2152. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvrabwOLD 3428*	Obsolete version of cbvrabw 3427 as of 19-Jul-2025. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2380. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	nfrabw 3429*	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. Version of nfrab 3430 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2380. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) Avoid ax-13 2380. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	nfrab 3430	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker nfrabw 3429 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	cbvrab 3431	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvrabw 3427 when possible. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
2.1.6  The universal class
Syntax	cvv 3432	Extend class notation to include the universal class symbol.
class V
Theorem	vjust 3433	Justification theorem for df-v 3434. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑥} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝑦}
Definition	df-v 3434	Define the universal class. Definition 5.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. Also Definition 2.9 of [Quine] p. 19. The class V can be described as the "class of all sets"; vprc 5249 proves that V is not itself a set in ZF. We will frequently use the expression 𝐴 ∈ V as a short way to say "𝐴 is a set", and isset 3446 proves that this expression has the same meaning as ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝐴. In well-founded set theories without urelements, like ZF, the class V is equal to the von Neumann universe. However, the letter "V" does not stand for "von Neumann". The letter "V" was used earlier by Peano in 1889 for the universe of sets, where the letter V is derived from the Latin word "Verum", referring to the true truth constant 𝑇. Peano's notation V was adopted by Whitehead and Russell in Principia Mathematica for the class of all sets in 1910. The class constant V is the first class constant introduced in this database. As a constant, as opposed to a variable, it cannot be substituted with anything, and in particular it is not part of any disjoint variable condition. For a general discussion of the theory of classes, see mmset.html#class 3446. See dfv2 3435 for an alternate definition. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ V = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑥}
Theorem	dfv2 3435	Alternate definition of the universal class (see df-v 3434). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
⊢ V = {𝑥 ∣ ⊤}
Theorem	vex 3436	All setvar variables are sets (see isset 3446). Theorem 6.8 of [Quine] p. 43. A shorter proof is possible from eleq2i 2832 but it uses more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) Remove use of ax-12 2189. (Revised by SN, 28-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
Theorem	elv 3437	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3436), then it is true. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	elvd 3438	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3436) and another antecedent, then it is implied by that other antecedent. Deduction associated with elv 3437. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	el2v 3439	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V and 𝑦 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3436), then it is true. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	el3v 3440	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V and 𝑧 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3436), then it is true. Inference forms (with ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V, ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V and ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V hypotheses) of the general theorems (proving ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → assertions) may be superfluous. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	el3v3 3441	If a proposition is implied by 𝑧 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3436) and two other antecedents, then it is implied by these other antecedents. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
Theorem	eqv 3442*	The universe contains every set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2006.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168, ax-13 2380. (Revised by BJ, 10-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 = V ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvf 3443	The universe contains every set. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = V ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	abv 3444	The class of sets verifying a property is the universal class if and only if that property is a tautology. The reverse implication (bj-abv 37266) requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2021.) Avoid df-clel 2815, ax-8 2121. (Revised by GG, 30-Aug-2024.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 30-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = V ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	abvALT 3445	Alternate proof of abv 3444, shorter but using more axioms. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = V ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	isset 3446*	Two ways to express that "𝐴 is a set": A class 𝐴 is a member of the universal class V (see df-v 3434) if and only if the class 𝐴 exists (i.e., there exists some set 𝑥 equal to class 𝐴). Theorem 6.9 of [Quine] p. 43. A class 𝐴 which is not a set is called a proper class. Conventions: We will often use the expression "𝐴 ∈ V " to mean "𝐴 is a set", for example in uniex 7691. To make some theorems more readily applicable, we will also use the more general expression 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 instead of 𝐴 ∈ V to mean "𝐴 is a set", typically in an antecedent, or in a hypothesis for theorems in deduction form (see for instance uniexg 7690 compared with uniex 7691). That this is more general is seen either by substitution (when the variable 𝑉 has no other occurrences), or by elex 3453. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	cbvexeqsetf 3447*	The expression ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝐴 means "𝐴 is a set" even if 𝐴 contains 𝑥 as a bound variable. This lemma helps minimizing axiom or df-clab 2719 usage in some cases. Extracted from the proof of issetft 3448. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴))
Theorem	issetft 3448	Closed theorem form of isset 3446 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. Extracted from the proof of vtoclgft 3500. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))
Theorem	issetf 3449	A version of isset 3446 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	isseti 3450*	A way to say "𝐴 is a set" (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.) Remove dependencies on axioms. (Revised by BJ, 13-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴
Theorem	issetri 3451*	A way to say "𝐴 is a set" (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	eqvisset 3452	A class equal to a variable is a set. Note the absence of disjoint variable condition, contrary to isset 3446 and issetri 3451. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elex 3453	If a class is a member of another class, then it is a set. Theorem 6.12 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elexOLD 3454	Obsolete version of elex 3453 as of 28-May-2025. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elexi 3455	If a class is a member of another class, then it is a set. Inference associated with elex 3453. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	elexd 3456	If a class is a member of another class, then it is a set. Deduction associated with elex 3453. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elex22 3457*	If two classes each contain another class, then both contain some set. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	prcnel 3458	A proper class doesn't belong to any class. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	ralv 3459	A universal quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rexv 3460	An existential quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	reuv 3461	A unique existential quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rmov 3462	An at-most-one quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rabab 3463	A class abstraction restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ V ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	rexcom4b 3464*	Specialized existential commutation lemma. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ceqsal1t 3465	One direction of ceqsalt 3466 is based on fewer assumptions and fewer axioms. It is at the same time the reverse direction of vtoclgft 3500. Extracted from a proof of ceqsalt 3466. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	ceqsalt 3466*	Closed theorem version of ceqsalg 3468. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsralt 3467*	Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalt 3466. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsalg 3468*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. For an alternate proof, see ceqsalgALT 3469. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsalgALT 3469*	Alternate proof of ceqsalg 3468, not using ceqsalt 3466. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Revised by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsal 3470*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) Avoid df-clab 2719. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsalALT 3471*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. Shorter proof uses df-clab 2719. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsalv 3472*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) Avoid ax-12 2189. (Revised by SN, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsralv 3473*	Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalv 3472. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2013.) Avoid ax-9 2129, ax-12 2189, ax-ext 2712. (Revised by SN, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	gencl 3474*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜓)
Theorem	2gencl 3475*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 𝐵 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐷 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜒)
Theorem	3gencl 3476*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 𝐵 = 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑅 𝐶 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐷 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐹 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐺 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑅) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜃)
Theorem	cgsexg 3477*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-2007.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	cgsex2g 3478*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	cgsex4g 3479*	An implicit substitution inference for 4 general classes. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1995.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) Avoid ax-9 2129, ax-ext 2712. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 21-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsex 3480*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsexv 3481*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) Avoid ax-12 2189. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsexv2d 3482*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) Shorten, reduce dv conditions. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jun-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑
Theorem	ceqsexv2dOLD 3483*	Obsolete version of ceqsexv2d 3482 as of 5-Jun-2025. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑
Theorem	ceqsex2 3484*	Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	ceqsex2v 3485*	Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.) Avoid ax-10 2152 and ax-11 2168. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	ceqsex3v 3486*	Elimination of three existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜃)
Theorem	ceqsex4v 3487*	Elimination of four existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜏)
Theorem	ceqsex6v 3488*	Elimination of six existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐸 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝐹 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ∧ (𝑤 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝐹) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜁)
Theorem	ceqsex8v 3489*	Elimination of eight existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐸 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝐹 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝐺 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝐻 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜌))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡∃𝑠(((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) ∧ ((𝑣 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝐹) ∧ (𝑡 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑠 = 𝐻)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜌)
Theorem	gencbvex 3490*	Change of bound variable using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝜃 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	gencbvex2 3491*	Restatement of gencbvex 3490 with weaker hypotheses. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 6-Dec-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → ∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝜃 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	gencbval 3492*	Change of bound variable using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜒 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝜃 → 𝜓))
Theorem	sbhypf 3493*	Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See also csbhypf 3866. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	spcimgft 3494	Closed theorem form of spcimgf 3498. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	spcimgfi1 3495	A closed version of spcimgf 3498. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	spcimgfi1OLD 3496	Obsolete version of spcimgfi1 3495 as of 27-Jul-2025. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	spcgft 3497	A closed version of spcgf 3536. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	spcimgf 3498	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	spcimegf 3499	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	vtoclgft 3500	Closed theorem form of vtoclgf 3516. The reverse implication is proven in ceqsal1t 3465. See ceqsalt 3466 for a version with 𝑥 and 𝐴 disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 11-Aug-2021.) Avoid ax-13 2380. (Revised by GG, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ∧ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜓)