P. 35 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3401-3500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Definition	df-rab 3401	Define a restricted class abstraction (class builder): {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} is the class of all sets 𝑥 in 𝐴 such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true. Definition of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. For the interpretation given in the previous paragraph to be correct, we need to assume Ⅎ𝑥𝐴, which is the case as soon as 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint, which is generally the case. If 𝐴 were to depend on 𝑥, then the interpretation would be less obvious (think of the two extreme cases 𝐴 = {𝑥} and 𝐴 = 𝑥, for instance). See also df-ral 3053. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
Theorem	rabbidva2 3402*	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbia2 3403	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}
Theorem	rabbiia 3404	Equivalent formulas yield equal restricted class abstractions (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	rabbii 3405	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Inference form of rabbidv 3407. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	rabbidva 3406*	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by SN, 3-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbidv 3407*	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbieq 3408	Equivalent wff's correspond to restricted class abstractions which are equal with the same class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	rabswap 3409	Swap with a membership relation in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2005.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	cbvrabv 3410*	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.) Require 𝑥, 𝑦 be disjoint to avoid ax-11 2163 and ax-13 2377. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	rabeqcda 3411*	When 𝜓 is always true in a context, a restricted class abstraction is equal to the restricting class. Deduction form of rabeqc 3412. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = 𝐴)
Theorem	rabeqc 3412*	A restricted class abstraction equals the restricting class if its condition follows from the membership of the free setvar variable in the restricting class. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2022.) (Proof shortened by SN, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴
Theorem	rabeqi 3413	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions. Inference form of rabeqf 3434. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 3-Jun-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	rabeq 3414*	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	rabeqdv 3415*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. Deduction form of rabeq 3414. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	rabeqbidva 3416*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) Remove DV conditions. (Revised by GG, 1-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabeqbidvaOLD 3417*	Obsolete version of rabeqbidva 3416 as of 1-Sep-2025. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabeqbidv 3418*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Dec-2009.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabrabi 3419*	Abstract builder restricted to another restricted abstract builder with implicit substitution. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2022.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163 and ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	nfrab1 3420	The abstraction variable in a restricted class abstraction isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	rabid 3421	An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	rabidim1 3422	Membership in a restricted abstraction, implication. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	reqabi 3423	Inference from equality of a class variable and a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	rabrab 3424	Abstract builder restricted to another restricted abstract builder. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Aug-2017.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	rabbida4 3425	Version of rabbidva2 3402 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbida 3426	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). Version of rabbidva 3406 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Mar-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbid 3427	Version of rabbidv 3407 with disjoint variable condition replaced by nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabeqd 3428	Deduction form of rabeq 3414. Note that contrary to rabeq 3414 it has no disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	rabeqbida 3429	Version of rabeqbidva 3416 with two disjoint variable conditions removed and the third replaced by a nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbi 3430	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Closed theorem form of rabbii 3405. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabid2f 3431	An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rabid2im 3432*	One direction of rabid2 3433 is based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 26-May-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	rabid2 3433*	An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. Prefer rabid2im 3432 if one direction is sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rabeqf 3434	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	cbvrabw 3435*	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrab 3440 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2377. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2377. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-10 2147. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvrabwOLD 3436*	Obsolete version of cbvrabw 3435 as of 19-Jul-2025. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2377. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	nfrabw 3437*	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. Version of nfrab 3439 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2377. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) Avoid ax-13 2377. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	rabbidaOLD 3438	Obsolete version of rabbida 3426 as of 14-Mar-2025. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	nfrab 3439	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2377. Use the weaker nfrabw 3437 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	cbvrab 3440	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2377. Use the weaker cbvrabw 3435 when possible. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
2.1.6  The universal class
Syntax	cvv 3441	Extend class notation to include the universal class symbol.
class V
Theorem	vjust 3442	Justification theorem for df-v 3443. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑥} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝑦}
Definition	df-v 3443	Define the universal class. Definition 5.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. Also Definition 2.9 of [Quine] p. 19. The class V can be described as the "class of all sets"; vprc 5261 proves that V is not itself a set in ZF. We will frequently use the expression 𝐴 ∈ V as a short way to say "𝐴 is a set", and isset 3455 proves that this expression has the same meaning as ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝐴. In well-founded set theories without urelements, like ZF, the class V is equal to the von Neumann universe. However, the letter "V" does not stand for "von Neumann". The letter "V" was used earlier by Peano in 1889 for the universe of sets, where the letter V is derived from the Latin word "Verum", referring to the true truth constant 𝑇. Peano's notation V was adopted by Whitehead and Russell in Principia Mathematica for the class of all sets in 1910. The class constant V is the first class constant introduced in this database. As a constant, as opposed to a variable, it cannot be substituted with anything, and in particular it is not part of any disjoint variable condition. For a general discussion of the theory of classes, see mmset.html#class 3455. See dfv2 3444 for an alternate definition. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ V = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑥}
Theorem	dfv2 3444	Alternate definition of the universal class (see df-v 3443). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
⊢ V = {𝑥 ∣ ⊤}
Theorem	vex 3445	All setvar variables are sets (see isset 3455). Theorem 6.8 of [Quine] p. 43. A shorter proof is possible from eleq2i 2829 but it uses more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) Remove use of ax-12 2185. (Revised by SN, 28-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
Theorem	elv 3446	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3445), then it is true. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	elvd 3447	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3445) and another antecedent, then it is implied by that other antecedent. Deduction associated with elv 3446. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	el2v 3448	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V and 𝑦 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3445), then it is true. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	el3v 3449	If a proposition is implied by 𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V and 𝑧 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3445), then it is true. Inference forms (with ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V, ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V and ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V hypotheses) of the general theorems (proving ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → assertions) may be superfluous. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	el3v3 3450	If a proposition is implied by 𝑧 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3445) and two other antecedents, then it is implied by these other antecedents. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
Theorem	eqv 3451*	The universe contains every set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2006.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-13 2377. (Revised by BJ, 10-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 = V ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvf 3452	The universe contains every set. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = V ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	abv 3453	The class of sets verifying a property is the universal class if and only if that property is a tautology. The reverse implication (bj-abv 37082) requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2021.) Avoid df-clel 2812, ax-8 2116. (Revised by GG, 30-Aug-2024.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 30-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = V ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	abvALT 3454	Alternate proof of abv 3453, shorter but using more axioms. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = V ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	isset 3455*	Two ways to express that "𝐴 is a set": A class 𝐴 is a member of the universal class V (see df-v 3443) if and only if the class 𝐴 exists (i.e., there exists some set 𝑥 equal to class 𝐴). Theorem 6.9 of [Quine] p. 43. A class 𝐴 which is not a set is called a proper class. Conventions: We will often use the expression "𝐴 ∈ V " to mean "𝐴 is a set", for example in uniex 7688. To make some theorems more readily applicable, we will also use the more general expression 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 instead of 𝐴 ∈ V to mean "𝐴 is a set", typically in an antecedent, or in a hypothesis for theorems in deduction form (see for instance uniexg 7687 compared with uniex 7688). That this is more general is seen either by substitution (when the variable 𝑉 has no other occurrences), or by elex 3462. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	cbvexeqsetf 3456*	The expression ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝐴 means "𝐴 is a set" even if 𝐴 contains 𝑥 as a bound variable. This lemma helps minimizing axiom or df-clab 2716 usage in some cases. Extracted from the proof of issetft 3457. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴))
Theorem	issetft 3457	Closed theorem form of isset 3455 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. Extracted from the proof of vtoclgft 3510. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))
Theorem	issetf 3458	A version of isset 3455 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	isseti 3459*	A way to say "𝐴 is a set" (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.) Remove dependencies on axioms. (Revised by BJ, 13-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴
Theorem	issetri 3460*	A way to say "𝐴 is a set" (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	eqvisset 3461	A class equal to a variable is a set. Note the absence of disjoint variable condition, contrary to isset 3455 and issetri 3460. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elex 3462	If a class is a member of another class, then it is a set. Theorem 6.12 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elexOLD 3463	Obsolete version of elex 3462 as of 28-May-2025. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elexi 3464	If a class is a member of another class, then it is a set. Inference associated with elex 3462. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	elexd 3465	If a class is a member of another class, then it is a set. Deduction associated with elex 3462. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elex22 3466*	If two classes each contain another class, then both contain some set. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	prcnel 3467	A proper class doesn't belong to any class. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	ralv 3468	A universal quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rexv 3469	An existential quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	reuv 3470	A unique existential quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rmov 3471	An at-most-one quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rabab 3472	A class abstraction restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ V ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	rexcom4b 3473*	Specialized existential commutation lemma. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ceqsal1t 3474	One direction of ceqsalt 3475 is based on fewer assumptions and fewer axioms. It is at the same time the reverse direction of vtoclgft 3510. Extracted from a proof of ceqsalt 3475. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	ceqsalt 3475*	Closed theorem version of ceqsalg 3477. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsralt 3476*	Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalt 3475. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsalg 3477*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. For an alternate proof, see ceqsalgALT 3478. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsalgALT 3478*	Alternate proof of ceqsalg 3477, not using ceqsalt 3475. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Revised by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsal 3479*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) Avoid df-clab 2716. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsalALT 3480*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. Shorter proof uses df-clab 2716. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsalv 3481*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) Avoid ax-12 2185. (Revised by SN, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsralv 3482*	Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalv 3481. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2013.) Avoid ax-9 2124, ax-12 2185, ax-ext 2709. (Revised by SN, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	gencl 3483*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜓)
Theorem	2gencl 3484*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 𝐵 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐷 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜒)
Theorem	3gencl 3485*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 𝐵 = 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑅 𝐶 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐷 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐹 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐺 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑅) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜃)
Theorem	cgsexg 3486*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-2007.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	cgsex2g 3487*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	cgsex4g 3488*	An implicit substitution inference for 4 general classes. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1995.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) Avoid ax-9 2124, ax-ext 2709. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 21-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	cgsex4gOLD 3489*	Obsolete version of cgsex4g 3488 as of 21-Mar-2025. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1995.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163. (Revised by GG, 28-Jun-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ceqsex 3490*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsexv 3491*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) Avoid ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ceqsexv2d 3492*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) Shorten, reduce dv conditions. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jun-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑
Theorem	ceqsexv2dOLD 3493*	Obsolete version of ceqsexv2d 3492 as of 5-Jun-2025. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑
Theorem	ceqsex2 3494*	Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	ceqsex2v 3495*	Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.) Avoid ax-10 2147 and ax-11 2163. (Revised by GG, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	ceqsex3v 3496*	Elimination of three existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜃)
Theorem	ceqsex4v 3497*	Elimination of four existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜏)
Theorem	ceqsex6v 3498*	Elimination of six existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐸 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝐹 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ∧ (𝑤 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝐹) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜁)
Theorem	ceqsex8v 3499*	Elimination of eight existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐸 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝐹 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝐺 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝐻 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜌))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡∃𝑠(((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) ∧ ((𝑣 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝐹) ∧ (𝑡 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑠 = 𝐻)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜌)
Theorem	gencbvex 3500*	Change of bound variable using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝜃 ∧ 𝜓))