Theorem rexlim2d 46581

Description: Inference removing two restricted quantifiers. Same as rexlimdvv 3219, but with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rexlim2d.x	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rexlim2d.y	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
rexlim2d.3	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexlim2d	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝜒,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem rexlim2d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexlim2d.x	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		nfv 1947	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
3		rexlim2d.y	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
4		nfv 1947	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
5	3, 4	nfan 1932	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
6		nfv 1947	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒
7		rexlim2d.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
8	7	expdimp 458	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
9	5, 6, 8	rexlimd 3270	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))
10	9	ex 418	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒)))
11	1, 2, 10	rexlimd 3270	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  Ⅎwnf 1816   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3087

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-12 2213

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088

This theorem is used by:  fourierdlem48  47108