Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rmobidva | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-6 1975, ax-7 2015, ax-12 2175. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2024.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rmobidva.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rmobidva | ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rmobidva.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
2 | 1 | pm5.32da 579 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
3 | 2 | mobidv 2551 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
4 | df-rmo 3074 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
5 | df-rmo 3074 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3bitr4g 314 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 396 ∈ wcel 2110 ∃*wmo 2540 ∃*wrmo 3069 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1802 ax-4 1816 ax-5 1917 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-ex 1787 df-mo 2542 df-rmo 3074 |
This theorem is referenced by: rmobidv 3328 brdom7disj 10298 phpreu 35770 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |