Theorem rspcdv2 3601

Description: Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv2.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
rspcdv2.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv2.3	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcdv2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜒,𝑥   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcdv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv2.3	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
2		rspcdv2.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
3		rspcdv2.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
4	2, 3	rspcdv 3598	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))
5	1, 4	mpd 15	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2107  ∀wral 3050

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2706

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1779  df-sb 2064  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2808  df-ral 3051

This theorem is referenced by:  frd  5623  ufdprmidl  33510  cantnf2  43283  imo72b2  44130