Theorem spcdv 3509

Description: Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Analogous to rspcdv 3529. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
spcimdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
spcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
spcdv	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem spcdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spcimdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		spcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimpd 232	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
4	1, 3	spcimdv 3508	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1541   = wceq 1543   ∈ wcel 2110

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1976  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2112

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-tru 1546  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2071  df-clab 2715  df-clel 2816

This theorem is referenced by:  spcgv  3511  mrissmrcd  17143