Theorem spcimedv 3597

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
spcimdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
spcimedv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
spcimedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem spcimedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spcimdv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		spcimedv.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
3	2	con3d 155	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒))
4	1, 3	spcimdv 3595	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒))
5	4	con2d 136	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓))
6		df-ex 1780	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)
7	5, 6	syl6ibr 254	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥𝜓))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1534   = wceq 1536  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2113

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-ext 2796

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1780  df-cleq 2817  df-clel 2896

This theorem is referenced by:  spc3egv  3607  hashf1rn  13716  cshwsexa  14189  wwlktovfo  14325  uvcendim  20994  wlkiswwlks2  27656  wwlksnextsurj  27681  elwwlks2  27748  elwspths2spth  27749  clwlkclwwlklem1  27780  rtrclex  39983  clcnvlem  39989  iunrelexpuztr  40070