MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  spim Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem spim 2395
Description: Specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 2395 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. See spimw 1970 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
spim.1 𝑥𝜓
spim.2 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))
Assertion
Ref Expression
spim (∀𝑥𝜑𝜓)

Proof of Theorem spim
StepHypRef Expression
1 spim.1 . 2 𝑥𝜓
2 ax6e 2391 . . 3 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
3 spim.2 . . 3 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))
42, 3eximii 1835 . 2 𝑥(𝜑𝜓)
51, 419.36i 2232 1 (∀𝑥𝜑𝜓)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wal 1535  wnf 1781
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-12 2178  ax-13 2380
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782
This theorem is referenced by:  spimv  2398  chvar  2403  cbv3  2405
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator