Theorem noetalem1 31988

Description: Lemma for noeta 31993. Establish that our final surreal really is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
noetalem.1	⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2𝑜⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))
noetalem.2	⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1𝑜}))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
noetalem1	⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑍 ∈ No )

Distinct variable group:   𝐴,𝑔,𝑢,𝑣,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦,𝑣,𝑢,𝑔)   𝑆(𝑥,𝑦,𝑣,𝑢,𝑔)   𝑍(𝑥,𝑦,𝑣,𝑢,𝑔)

Proof of Theorem noetalem1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		noetalem.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1𝑜}))
2		noetalem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2𝑜⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))
3	2	nosupno 31974	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) → 𝑆 ∈ No )
4	3	3adant3 1101	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑆 ∈ No )
5		bdayimaon 31968	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∈ On)
6	5	3ad2ant3 1104	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∈ On)
7		1on 7612	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 1𝑜 ∈ On
8	7	elexi 3244	. . . . 5 ⊢ 1𝑜 ∈ V
9	8	prid1 4329	. . . 4 ⊢ 1𝑜 ∈ {1𝑜, 2𝑜}
10	9	noextendseq 31945	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ No ∧ suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∈ On) → (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1𝑜})) ∈ No )
11	4, 6, 10	syl2anc 694	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1𝑜})) ∈ No )
12	1, 11	syl5eqel 2734	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑍 ∈ No )

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383   ∧ w3a 1054   = wceq 1523   ∈ wcel 2030  {cab 2637  ∀wral 2941  ∃wrex 2942  Vcvv 3231   ∖ cdif 3604   ∪ cun 3605   ⊆ wss 3607  ifcif 4119  {csn 4210  ⟨cop 4216  ∪ cuni 4468   class class class wbr 4685   ↦ cmpt 4762   × cxp 5141  dom cdm 5143   ↾ cres 5145   “ cima 5146  Oncon0 5761  suc csuc 5763  ℩cio 5887  ‘cfv 5926  ℩crio 6650  1_𝑜c1o 7598  2_𝑜c2o 7599   No csur 31918   <s cslt 31919   bday cbday 31920

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1762  ax-4 1777  ax-5 1879  ax-6 1945  ax-7 1981  ax-8 2032  ax-9 2039  ax-10 2059  ax-11 2074  ax-12 2087  ax-13 2282  ax-ext 2631  ax-rep 4804  ax-sep 4814  ax-nul 4822  ax-pow 4873  ax-pr 4936  ax-un 6991

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3or 1055  df-3an 1056  df-tru 1526  df-ex 1745  df-nf 1750  df-sb 1938  df-eu 2502  df-mo 2503  df-clab 2638  df-cleq 2644  df-clel 2647  df-nfc 2782  df-ne 2824  df-ral 2946  df-rex 2947  df-reu 2948  df-rmo 2949  df-rab 2950  df-v 3233  df-sbc 3469  df-csb 3567  df-dif 3610  df-un 3612  df-in 3614  df-ss 3621  df-pss 3623  df-nul 3949  df-if 4120  df-pw 4193  df-sn 4211  df-pr 4213  df-tp 4215  df-op 4217  df-uni 4469  df-iun 4554  df-br 4686  df-opab 4746  df-mpt 4763  df-tr 4786  df-id 5053  df-eprel 5058  df-po 5064  df-so 5065  df-fr 5102  df-we 5104  df-xp 5149  df-rel 5150  df-cnv 5151  df-co 5152  df-dm 5153  df-rn 5154  df-res 5155  df-ima 5156  df-ord 5764  df-on 5765  df-suc 5767  df-iota 5889  df-fun 5928  df-fn 5929  df-f 5930  df-f1 5931  df-fo 5932  df-f1o 5933  df-fv 5934  df-riota 6651  df-1o 7605  df-2o 7606  df-no 31921  df-slt 31922  df-bday 31923

This theorem is referenced by:  noetalem2  31989  noetalem3  31990  noetalem4  31991  noetalem5  31992