Theorem bds 16446

Description: Boundedness of a formula resulting from implicit substitution in a bounded formula. Note that the proof does not use ax-bdsb 16417; therefore, using implicit instead of explicit substitution when boundedness is important, one might avoid using ax-bdsb 16417. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bds.bd	|- BOUNDED ph
bds.1	|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bds	|- BOUNDED ps

Distinct variable groups:   ps, x   ph, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( y)

Proof of Theorem bds

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bds.bd	. . . 4 |- BOUNDED ph
2	1	bdcab 16444	. . 3 |- BOUNDED { x | ph }
3		bds.1	. . . 4 |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
4	3	cbvabv 2356	. . 3 |- { x | ph } = { y | ps }
5	2, 4	bdceqi 16438	. 2 |- BOUNDED { y | ps }
6	5	bdph 16445	1 |- BOUNDED ps

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   {cab 2217  BOUNDED wbd 16407

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-ext 2213  ax-bd0 16408  ax-bdsb 16417

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-bdc 16436

This theorem is referenced by: (None)