Theorem bds 16124

Description: Boundedness of a formula resulting from implicit substitution in a bounded formula. Note that the proof does not use ax-bdsb 16095; therefore, using implicit instead of explicit substitution when boundedness is important, one might avoid using ax-bdsb 16095. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bds.bd	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
bds.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bds	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜓

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑥   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bds

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bds.bd	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
2	1	bdcab 16122	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3		bds.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	3	cbvabv 2334	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
5	2, 4	bdceqi 16116	. 2 ⊢ BOUNDED {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
6	5	bdph 16123	1 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜓

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105  {cab 2195  BOUNDED wbd 16085

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 713  ax-5 1473  ax-7 1474  ax-gen 1475  ax-ie1 1519  ax-ie2 1520  ax-8 1530  ax-10 1531  ax-11 1532  ax-i12 1533  ax-bndl 1535  ax-4 1536  ax-17 1552  ax-i9 1556  ax-ial 1560  ax-i5r 1561  ax-ext 2191  ax-bd0 16086  ax-bdsb 16095

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1487  df-sb 1789  df-clab 2196  df-cleq 2202  df-clel 2205  df-bdc 16114

This theorem is referenced by: (None)