Theorem bds 13693

Description: Boundedness of a formula resulting from implicit substitution in a bounded formula. Note that the proof does not use ax-bdsb 13664; therefore, using implicit instead of explicit substitution when boundedness is important, one might avoid using ax-bdsb 13664. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bds.bd	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
bds.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bds	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜓

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑥   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bds

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bds.bd	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
2	1	bdcab 13691	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3		bds.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	3	cbvabv 2290	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
5	2, 4	bdceqi 13685	. 2 ⊢ BOUNDED {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
6	5	bdph 13692	1 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜓

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104  {cab 2151  BOUNDED wbd 13654

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-ext 2147  ax-bd0 13655  ax-bdsb 13664

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-bdc 13683

This theorem is referenced by: (None)