Theorem bds 17048

Description: Boundedness of a formula resulting from implicit substitution in a bounded formula. Note that the proof does not use ax-bdsb 17019; therefore, using implicit instead of explicit substitution when boundedness is important, one might avoid using ax-bdsb 17019. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bds.bd	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
bds.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bds	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜓

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑥   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bds

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bds.bd	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
2	1	bdcab 17046	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3		bds.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	3	cbvabv 2365	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
5	2, 4	bdceqi 17040	. 2 ⊢ BOUNDED {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
6	5	bdph 17047	1 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜓

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105  {cab 2224  BOUNDED wbd 17009

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220  ax-bd0 17010  ax-bdsb 17019

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-bdc 17038

This theorem is used by: (None)