Theorem ctiunctlemuom 13007

Description: Lemma for ctiunct 13011. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ctiunct.som	|- ( ph -> S C_ om )
ctiunct.sdc	|- ( ph -> A. n e. om DECID n e. S )
ctiunct.f	|- ( ph -> F : S -onto-> A )
ctiunct.tom	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> T C_ om )
ctiunct.tdc	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> A. n e. om DECID n e. T )
ctiunct.g	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> G : T -onto-> B )
ctiunct.j	|- ( ph -> J : om -1-1-onto-> ( om X. om ) )
ctiunct.u	|- U = { z e. om | ( ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ctiunctlemuom	|- ( ph -> U C_ om )

Proof of Theorem ctiunctlemuom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ctiunct.u	. . 3 |- U = { z e. om | ( ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) }
2		ssrab2 3309	. . 3 |- { z e. om | ( ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) } C_ om
3	1, 2	eqsstri 3256	. 2 |- U C_ om
4	3	a1i 9	1 |- ( ph -> U C_ om )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104  DECID wdc 839   = wceq 1395   e. wcel 2200   A.wral 2508   {crab 2512   [_csb 3124   C_ wss 3197   omcom 4682   X. cxp 4717   -onto->wfo 5316   -1-1-onto->wf1o 5317   ` cfv 5318   1stc1st 6284   2ndc2nd 6285

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-ext 2211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-rab 2517  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210

This theorem is referenced by:  ctiunct  13011