Theorem ctiunctlemuom 12391

Description: Lemma for ctiunct 12395. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ctiunct.som	|- ( ph -> S C_ om )
ctiunct.sdc	|- ( ph -> A. n e. om DECID n e. S )
ctiunct.f	|- ( ph -> F : S -onto-> A )
ctiunct.tom	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> T C_ om )
ctiunct.tdc	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> A. n e. om DECID n e. T )
ctiunct.g	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> G : T -onto-> B )
ctiunct.j	|- ( ph -> J : om -1-1-onto-> ( om X. om ) )
ctiunct.u	|- U = { z e. om | ( ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ctiunctlemuom	|- ( ph -> U C_ om )

Proof of Theorem ctiunctlemuom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ctiunct.u	. . 3 |- U = { z e. om | ( ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) }
2		ssrab2 3232	. . 3 |- { z e. om | ( ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) } C_ om
3	1, 2	eqsstri 3179	. 2 |- U C_ om
4	3	a1i 9	1 |- ( ph -> U C_ om )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103  DECID wdc 829   = wceq 1348   e. wcel 2141   A.wral 2448   {crab 2452   [_csb 3049   C_ wss 3121   omcom 4574   X. cxp 4609   -onto->wfo 5196   -1-1-onto->wf1o 5197   ` cfv 5198   1stc1st 6117   2ndc2nd 6118

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-ext 2152

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-rab 2457  df-in 3127  df-ss 3134

This theorem is referenced by:  ctiunct  12395