Theorem ctiunctlemu2nd 12390

Description: Lemma for ctiunct 12395. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ctiunct.som	|- ( ph -> S C_ om )
ctiunct.sdc	|- ( ph -> A. n e. om DECID n e. S )
ctiunct.f	|- ( ph -> F : S -onto-> A )
ctiunct.tom	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> T C_ om )
ctiunct.tdc	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> A. n e. om DECID n e. T )
ctiunct.g	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> G : T -onto-> B )
ctiunct.j	|- ( ph -> J : om -1-1-onto-> ( om X. om ) )
ctiunct.u	|- U = { z e. om | ( ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) }
ctiunctlem.n	|- ( ph -> N e. U )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ctiunctlemu2nd	|- ( ph -> ( 2nd ` ( J ` N ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) ) / x ]_ T )

Distinct variable groups:   z, F   z, J   z, N   z, S   z, T   x, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, z, n)   A( x, z, n)   B( x, z, n)   S( x, n)   T( x, n)   U( x, z, n)   F( x, n)   G( x, z, n)   J( x, n)   N( x, n)

Proof of Theorem ctiunctlemu2nd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ctiunctlem.n	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> N e. U )
2		2fveq3 5501	. . . . . . 7 |- ( z = N -> ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) = ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) )
3	2	eleq1d 2239	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = N -> ( ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) e. S <-> ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) e. S ) )
4		2fveq3 5501	. . . . . . 7 |- ( z = N -> ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) = ( 2nd ` ( J ` N ) ) )
5	2	fveq2d 5500	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( z = N -> ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) = ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) ) )
6	5	csbeq1d 3056	. . . . . . 7 |- ( z = N -> [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T = [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) ) / x ]_ T )
7	4, 6	eleq12d 2241	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = N -> ( ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T <-> ( 2nd ` ( J ` N ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) )
8	3, 7	anbi12d 470	. . . . 5 |- ( z = N -> ( ( ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) <-> ( ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` N ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) ) )
9		ctiunct.u	. . . . 5 |- U = { z e. om | ( ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` z ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` z ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) }
10	8, 9	elrab2 2889	. . . 4 |- ( N e. U <-> ( N e. om /\ ( ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` N ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) ) )
11	1, 10	sylib 121	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( N e. om /\ ( ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` N ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) ) )
12	11	simprd 113	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) e. S /\ ( 2nd ` ( J ` N ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) ) / x ]_ T ) )
13	12	simprd 113	1 |- ( ph -> ( 2nd ` ( J ` N ) ) e. [_ ( F ` ( 1st ` ( J ` N ) ) ) / x ]_ T )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103  DECID wdc 829   = wceq 1348   e. wcel 2141   A.wral 2448   {crab 2452   [_csb 3049   C_ wss 3121   omcom 4574   X. cxp 4609   -onto->wfo 5196   -1-1-onto->wf1o 5197   ` cfv 5198   1stc1st 6117   2ndc2nd 6118

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-ext 2152

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 975  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-rex 2454  df-rab 2457  df-v 2732  df-sbc 2956  df-csb 3050  df-un 3125  df-sn 3589  df-pr 3590  df-op 3592  df-uni 3797  df-br 3990  df-iota 5160  df-fv 5206

This theorem is referenced by:  ctiunctlemf  12393