Theorem elab3gf 2914

Description: Membership in a class abstraction, with a weaker antecedent than elabgf 2906. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elab3gf.1	|- F/_ x A
elab3gf.2	|- F/ x ps
elab3gf.3	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elab3gf	|- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )

Proof of Theorem elab3gf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elab3gf.1	. . . 4 |- F/_ x A
2		elab3gf.2	. . . 4 |- F/ x ps
3		elab3gf.3	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
4	1, 2, 3	elabgf 2906	. . 3 |- ( A e. { x | ph } -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
5	4	ibi 176	. 2 |- ( A e. { x | ph } -> ps )
6	1, 2, 3	elabgf 2906	. . . 4 |- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
7	6	imim2i 12	. . 3 |- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( ps -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) ) )
8		biimpr 130	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) -> ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } ) )
9	7, 8	syli 37	. 2 |- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } ) )
10	5, 9	impbid2 143	1 |- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1364   F/wnf 1474   e. wcel 2167   {cab 2182   F/_wnfc 2326

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-v 2765

This theorem is referenced by:  elab3g  2915