| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > elab3gf | GIF version | ||
| Description: Membership in a class abstraction, with a weaker antecedent than elabgf 2919. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elab3gf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
| elab3gf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 |
| elab3gf.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elab3gf | ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | elab3gf.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
| 2 | elab3gf.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
| 3 | elab3gf.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | elabgf 2919 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| 5 | 4 | ibi 176 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜓) |
| 6 | 1, 2, 3 | elabgf 2919 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| 7 | 6 | imim2i 12 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))) |
| 8 | biimpr 130 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) | |
| 9 | 7, 8 | syli 37 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) |
| 10 | 5, 9 | impbid2 143 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1373 Ⅎwnf 1484 ∈ wcel 2177 {cab 2192 Ⅎwnfc 2336 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 711 ax-5 1471 ax-7 1472 ax-gen 1473 ax-ie1 1517 ax-ie2 1518 ax-8 1528 ax-10 1529 ax-11 1530 ax-i12 1531 ax-bndl 1533 ax-4 1534 ax-17 1550 ax-i9 1554 ax-ial 1558 ax-i5r 1559 ax-ext 2188 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1376 df-nf 1485 df-sb 1787 df-clab 2193 df-cleq 2199 df-clel 2202 df-nfc 2338 df-v 2775 |
| This theorem is referenced by: elab3g 2928 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |