| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > elab3gf | GIF version | ||
| Description: Membership in a class abstraction, with a weaker antecedent than elabgf 2914. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elab3gf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
| elab3gf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 |
| elab3gf.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elab3gf | ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | elab3gf.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
| 2 | elab3gf.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
| 3 | elab3gf.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | elabgf 2914 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| 5 | 4 | ibi 176 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜓) |
| 6 | 1, 2, 3 | elabgf 2914 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| 7 | 6 | imim2i 12 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))) |
| 8 | biimpr 130 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) | |
| 9 | 7, 8 | syli 37 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) |
| 10 | 5, 9 | impbid2 143 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1372 Ⅎwnf 1482 ∈ wcel 2175 {cab 2190 Ⅎwnfc 2334 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1469 ax-7 1470 ax-gen 1471 ax-ie1 1515 ax-ie2 1516 ax-8 1526 ax-10 1527 ax-11 1528 ax-i12 1529 ax-bndl 1531 ax-4 1532 ax-17 1548 ax-i9 1552 ax-ial 1556 ax-i5r 1557 ax-ext 2186 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1375 df-nf 1483 df-sb 1785 df-clab 2191 df-cleq 2197 df-clel 2200 df-nfc 2336 df-v 2773 |
| This theorem is referenced by: elab3g 2923 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |