P. 29 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2801-2900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cbvrabv 2801*	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x e. A | ph } = { y e. A | ps }
2.1.6  The universal class
Syntax	cvv 2802	Extend class notation to include the universal class symbol.
class _V
Theorem	vjust 2803	Soundness justification theorem for df-v 2804. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.)
|- { x | x = x } = { y | y = y }
Definition	df-v 2804	Define the universal class. Definition 5.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. Also Definition 2.9 of [Quine] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- _V = { x | x = x }
Theorem	vex 2805	All setvar variables are sets (see isset 2809). Theorem 6.8 of [Quine] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- x e. _V
Theorem	elv 2806	Technical lemma used to shorten proofs. If a proposition is implied by x e. _V (which is true, see vex 2805), then it is true. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
|- ( x e. _V -> ph )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	elvd 2807	Technical lemma used to shorten proofs. If a proposition is implied by x e. _V (which is true, see vex 2805) and another antecedent, then it is implied by the other antecedent. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2018.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. _V ) -> ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> ps )
Theorem	el2v 2808	If a proposition is implied by x e. _V and y e. _V (which is true, see vex 2805), then it is true. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Oct-2018.)
|- ( ( x e. _V /\ y e. _V ) -> ph )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	isset 2809*	Two ways to say " A is a set": A class A is a member of the universal class _V (see df-v 2804) if and only if the class A exists (i.e. there exists some set x equal to class A). Theorem 6.9 of [Quine] p. 43. Notational convention: We will use the notational device " A e. _V " to mean " A is a set" very frequently, for example in uniex 4534. Note the when A is not a set, it is called a proper class. In some theorems, such as uniexg 4536, in order to shorten certain proofs we use the more general antecedent A e. V instead of A e. _V to mean " A is a set." Note that a constant is implicitly considered distinct from all variables. This is why _V is not included in the distinct variable list, even though df-clel 2227 requires that the expression substituted for B not contain x. (Also, the Metamath spec does not allow constants in the distinct variable list.) (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
|- ( A e. _V <-> E. x x = A )
Theorem	issetf 2810	A version of isset that does not require x and A to be distinct. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A e. _V <-> E. x x = A )
Theorem	isseti 2811*	A way to say " A is a set" (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- E. x x = A
Theorem	issetri 2812*	A way to say " A is a set" (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- E. x x = A   =>    |- A e. _V
Theorem	eqvisset 2813	A class equal to a variable is a set. Note the absence of disjoint variable condition, contrary to isset 2809 and issetri 2812. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
|- ( x = A -> A e. _V )
Theorem	elex 2814	If a class is a member of another class, then it is a set. Theorem 6.12 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. B -> A e. _V )
Theorem	elexi 2815	If a class is a member of another class, it is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. B   =>    |- A e. _V
Theorem	elexd 2816	If a class is a member of another class, it is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. _V )
Theorem	elisset 2817*	An element of a class exists. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> E. x x = A )
Theorem	elex22 2818*	If two classes each contain another class, then both contain some set. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ A e. C ) -> E. x ( x e. B /\ x e. C ) )
Theorem	elex2 2819*	If a class contains another class, then it contains some set. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A e. B -> E. x x e. B )
Theorem	ralv 2820	A universal quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
|- ( A. x e. _V ph <-> A. x ph )
Theorem	rexv 2821	An existential quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. _V ph <-> E. x ph )
Theorem	reuv 2822	A unique existential quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.)
|- ( E! x e. _V ph <-> E! x ph )
Theorem	rmov 2823	An at-most-one quantifier restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E* x e. _V ph <-> E* x ph )
Theorem	rabab 2824	A class abstraction restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- { x e. _V | ph } = { x | ph }
Theorem	ralcom4 2825*	Commutation of restricted and unrestricted universal quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y ph <-> A. y A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcom4 2826*	Commutation of restricted and unrestricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y ph <-> E. y E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcom4a 2827*	Specialized existential commutation lemma. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.)
|- ( E. x E. y e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> E. y e. A ( ph /\ E. x ps ) )
Theorem	rexcom4b 2828*	Specialized existential commutation lemma. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( E. x E. y e. A ( ph /\ x = B ) <-> E. y e. A ph )
Theorem	ceqsalt 2829*	Closed theorem version of ceqsalg 2831. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. V ) -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsralt 2830*	Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalt 2829. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A. x e. B ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsalg 2831*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsal 2832*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	ceqsalv 2833*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	ceqsralv 2834*	Restricted quantifier version of ceqsalv 2833. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2013.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( A. x e. B ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	gencl 2835*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
|- ( th <-> E. x ( ch /\ A = B ) )   &    |- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ch -> ph )   =>    |- ( th -> ps )
Theorem	2gencl 2836*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
|- ( C e. S <-> E. x e. R A = C )   &    |- ( D e. S <-> E. y e. R B = D )   &    |- ( A = C -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( B = D -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. R /\ y e. R ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) -> ch )
Theorem	3gencl 2837*	Implicit substitution for class with embedded variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.)
|- ( D e. S <-> E. x e. R A = D )   &    |- ( F e. S <-> E. y e. R B = F )   &    |- ( G e. S <-> E. z e. R C = G )   &    |- ( A = D -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( B = F -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( C = G -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. R /\ y e. R /\ z e. R ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( D e. S /\ F e. S /\ G e. S ) -> th )
Theorem	cgsexg 2838*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-2007.)
|- ( x = A -> ch )   &    |- ( ch -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( E. x ( ch /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	cgsex2g 2839*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ch )   &    |- ( ch -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x E. y ( ch /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	cgsex4g 2840*	An implicit substitution inference for 4 general classes. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) /\ ( z = C /\ w = D ) ) -> ch )   &    |- ( ch -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. R /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( E. x E. y E. z E. w ( ch /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsex 2841*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	ceqsexv 2842*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	ceqsexv2d 2843*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) Shorten, reduce dv conditions. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jun-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ps   =>    |- E. x ph
Theorem	ceqsex2 2844*	Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y ( x = A /\ y = B /\ ph ) <-> ch )
Theorem	ceqsex2v 2845*	Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y ( x = A /\ y = B /\ ph ) <-> ch )
Theorem	ceqsex3v 2846*	Elimination of three existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y E. z ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) /\ ph ) <-> th )
Theorem	ceqsex4v 2847*	Elimination of four existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( w = D -> ( th <-> ta ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y E. z E. w ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) /\ ( z = C /\ w = D ) /\ ph ) <-> ta )
Theorem	ceqsex6v 2848*	Elimination of six existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   &    |- E e. _V   &    |- F e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( w = D -> ( th <-> ta ) )   &    |- ( v = E -> ( ta <-> et ) )   &    |- ( u = F -> ( et <-> ze ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) /\ ( w = D /\ v = E /\ u = F ) /\ ph ) <-> ze )
Theorem	ceqsex8v 2849*	Elimination of eight existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   &    |- E e. _V   &    |- F e. _V   &    |- G e. _V   &    |- H e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( w = D -> ( th <-> ta ) )   &    |- ( v = E -> ( ta <-> et ) )   &    |- ( u = F -> ( et <-> ze ) )   &    |- ( t = G -> ( ze <-> si ) )   &    |- ( s = H -> ( si <-> rh ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y E. z E. w E. v E. u E. t E. s ( ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) /\ ( z = C /\ w = D ) ) /\ ( ( v = E /\ u = F ) /\ ( t = G /\ s = H ) ) /\ ph ) <-> rh )
Theorem	gencbvex 2850*	Change of bound variable using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( th <-> E. x ( ch /\ A = y ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ( ch /\ ph ) <-> E. y ( th /\ ps ) )
Theorem	gencbvex2 2851*	Restatement of gencbvex 2850 with weaker hypotheses. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 6-Dec-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( th -> E. x ( ch /\ A = y ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ( ch /\ ph ) <-> E. y ( th /\ ps ) )
Theorem	gencbval 2852*	Change of bound variable using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2018.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( A = y -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( th <-> E. x ( ch /\ A = y ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ( ch -> ph ) <-> A. y ( th -> ps ) )
Theorem	sbhypf 2853*	Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See also csbhypf . (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( y = A -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	vtoclgft 2854	Closed theorem form of vtoclgf 2862. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( ( F/_ x A /\ F/ x ps ) /\ ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A. x ph ) /\ A e. V ) -> ps )
Theorem	vtocldf 2855	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ps )   &    |- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	vtocld 2856*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	vtoclf 2857*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. This is a generalization of chvar 1805. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ps
Theorem	vtocl 2858*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ps
Theorem	vtocl2 2859*	Implicit substitution of classes for setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ps
Theorem	vtocl3 2860*	Implicit substitution of classes for setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ps
Theorem	vtoclb 2861*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( ch <-> th )
Theorem	vtoclgf 2862	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable, with bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ps )
Theorem	vtoclg1f 2863*	Version of vtoclgf 2862 with one nonfreeness hypothesis replaced with a disjoint variable condition, thus avoiding dependency on ax-11 1554 and ax-13 2204. (Contributed by BJ, 1-May-2019.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ps )
Theorem	vtoclg 2864*	Implicit substitution of a class expression for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-Apr-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ps )
Theorem	vtoclbg 2865*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ch <-> th ) )
Theorem	vtocl2gf 2866	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ y B   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ch )
Theorem	vtocl3gf 2867	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ z A   &    |- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ z B   &    |- F/_ z C   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- F/ z th   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocl2g 2868*	Implicit substitution of 2 classes for 2 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ch )
Theorem	vtoclgaf 2869*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x e. B -> ph )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ps )
Theorem	vtoclga 2870*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x e. B -> ph )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ps )
Theorem	vtocl2gaf 2871*	Implicit substitution of 2 classes for 2 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2013.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ y B   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ch )
Theorem	vtocl2ga 2872*	Implicit substitution of 2 classes for 2 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ch )
Theorem	vtocl3gaf 2873*	Implicit substitution of 3 classes for 3 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ z A   &    |- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ z B   &    |- F/_ z C   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- F/ z th   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. R /\ y e. S /\ z e. T ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S /\ C e. T ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocl3ga 2874*	Implicit substitution of 3 classes for 3 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. D /\ y e. R /\ z e. S ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. R /\ C e. S ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocl4g 2875*	Implicit substitution of 4 classes for 4 setvar variables. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2019.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> rh ) )   &    |- ( w = D -> ( rh <-> th ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. Q /\ B e. R ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. T ) ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocl4ga 2876*	Implicit substitution of 4 classes for 4 setvar variables. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-May-2025.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> rh ) )   &    |- ( w = D -> ( rh <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. Q /\ y e. R ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. T ) ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. Q /\ B e. R ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. T ) ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocleg 2877*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2004.)
|- ( x = A -> ph )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ph )
Theorem	vtoclegft 2878*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Closed theorem version of vtoclef 2879.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ F/ x ph /\ A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) -> ph )
Theorem	vtoclef 2879*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ph )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	vtocle 2880*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-1993.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ph )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	vtoclri 2881*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- A. x e. B ph   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ps )
Theorem	spcimgft 2882	A closed version of spcimgf 2886. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) ) )
Theorem	spcgft 2883	A closed version of spcgf 2888. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) ) )
Theorem	spcimegft 2884	A closed version of spcimegf 2887. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) ) )
Theorem	spcegft 2885	A closed version of spcegf 2889. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jun-2018.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) ) )
Theorem	spcimgf 2886	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcimegf 2887	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) )
Theorem	spcgf 2888	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcegf 2889	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) )
Theorem	spcimdv 2890*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	spcdv 2891*	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Analogous to rspcdv 2913. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	spcimedv 2892*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ch -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ch -> E. x ps ) )
Theorem	spcgv 2893*	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcegv 2894*	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) )
Theorem	spcedv 2895*	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution, deduction version. (Contributed by RP, 12-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ph -> X e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ch )   &    |- ( x = X -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x ps )
Theorem	spc2egv 2896*	Existential specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( ps -> E. x E. y ph ) )
Theorem	spc2gv 2897*	Specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A. x A. y ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spc3egv 2898*	Existential specialization with 3 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( ps -> E. x E. y E. z ph ) )
Theorem	spc3gv 2899*	Specialization with 3 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A. x A. y A. z ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcv 2900*	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph -> ps )