Theorem sb7af 2022

Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1787. Similar to dfsb7a 2023 but does not require that 𝜑 and 𝑧 be distinct. Similar to sb7f 2021 in that it involves a dummy variable 𝑧, but expressed in terms of ∀ rather than ∃. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sb7af.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb7af	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem sb7af

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb6 1911	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))
2	1	sbbii 1789	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))
3		sb7af.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
4	3	sbco2 1994	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5		sb6 1911	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr3i 210	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1371  Ⅎwnf 1484  [wsb 1786

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787

This theorem is referenced by:  dfsb7a  2023