Theorem ceqsexv2d 2820

Description: Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) Shorten, reduce dv conditions. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jun-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsexv2d.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
ceqsexv2d.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
ceqsexv2d.3	⊢ 𝜓

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsexv2d	⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsexv2d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ceqsexv2d.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2	1	isseti 2788	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴
3		ceqsexv2d.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝜓
4		ceqsexv2d.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	mpbiri 168	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)
6	2, 5	eximii 1628	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1375  ∃wex 1518   ∈ wcel 2180  Vcvv 2779

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1473  ax-gen 1475  ax-ie1 1519  ax-ie2 1520  ax-8 1530  ax-4 1536  ax-17 1552  ax-i9 1556  ax-ial 1560  ax-ext 2191

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-sb 1789  df-clab 2196  df-cleq 2202  df-clel 2205  df-v 2781

This theorem is referenced by: (None)