Theorem ceqsexv2d 2800

Description: Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) Shorten, reduce dv conditions. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jun-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsexv2d.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
ceqsexv2d.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
ceqsexv2d.3	⊢ 𝜓

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsexv2d	⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsexv2d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ceqsexv2d.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2	1	isseti 2768	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴
3		ceqsexv2d.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝜓
4		ceqsexv2d.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	mpbiri 168	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)
6	2, 5	eximii 1613	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1364  ∃wex 1503   ∈ wcel 2164  Vcvv 2760

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1458  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-ext 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-v 2762

This theorem is referenced by: (None)