ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  difjust GIF version

Theorem difjust 2998
Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-dif 2999. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
difjust {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)}
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵

Proof of Theorem difjust
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eleq1 2150 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥𝐴𝑧𝐴))
2 eleq1 2150 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥𝐵𝑧𝐵))
32notbid 627 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (¬ 𝑥𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝑧𝐵))
41, 3anbi12d 457 . . 3 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ↔ (𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵)))
54cbvabv 2211 . 2 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵)}
6 eleq1 2150 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧𝐴𝑦𝐴))
7 eleq1 2150 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧𝐵𝑦𝐵))
87notbid 627 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑧𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝑦𝐵))
96, 8anbi12d 457 . . 3 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵) ↔ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)))
109cbvabv 2211 . 2 {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)}
115, 10eqtri 2108 1 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wa 102   = wceq 1289  wcel 1438  {cab 2074
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 579  ax-in2 580  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator