| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 32 of 170) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | sbceqal 3101* | A variation of extensionality for classes. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | sbeqalb 3102* | Theorem *14.121 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcbid 3103 | Formula-building deduction for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcbidv 3104* | Formula-building deduction for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcbii 3105 | Formula-building inference for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | eqsbc2 3106* | Substitution for the right-hand side in an equality. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | sbc3an 3107 | Distribution of class substitution over triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2006.) (Revised by NM, 17-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcel1v 3108* | Class substitution into a membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sbcel2gv 3109* | Class substitution into a membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcel21v 3110* | Class substitution into a membership relation. One direction of sbcel2gv 3109 that holds for proper classes. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sbcimdv 3111* | Substitution analogue of Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 (alim 1506). (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.) (Revised by NM, 17-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sbctt 3112 | Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcgf 3113 | Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbc19.21g 3114 | Substitution for a variable not free in antecedent affects only the consequent. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | sbcg 3115* | Substitution for a variable not occurring in a wff does not affect it. Distinct variable form of sbcgf 3113. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbc2iegf 3116* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbc2ie 3117* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sbc2iedv 3118* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sbc3ie 3119* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐶 / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sbccomlem 3120* | Lemma for sbccom 3121. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbccom 3121* | Commutative law for double class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcralt 3122* | Interchange class substitution and restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 22-Feb-2010.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcrext 3123* | Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcralg 3124* | Interchange class substitution and restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcrex 3125* | Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcreug 3126* | Interchange class substitution and restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | reu8nf 3127* | Restricted uniqueness using implicit substitution. This version of reu8 3016 uses a nonfreeness hypothesis for 𝑥 and 𝜓 instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | sbcabel 3128* | Interchange class substitution and class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | rspsbc 3129* | Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 4 of [Mendelson] p. 69. This provides an axiom for a predicate calculus for a restricted domain. This theorem generalizes the unrestricted stdpc4 1824 and spsbc 3057. See also rspsbca 3130 and rspcsbela . (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | rspsbca 3130* | Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 4 of [Mendelson] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rspesbca 3131* | Existence form of rspsbca 3130. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | spesbc 3132 | Existence form of spsbc 3057. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | spesbcd 3133 | form of spsbc 3057. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sbcth2 3134* | A substitution into a theorem. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ra5 3135 | Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 5 of [Mendelson] p. 69. This is an axiom of a predicate calculus for a restricted domain. Compare the unrestricted stdpc5 1633. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rmo2ilem 3136* | Condition implying restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rmo2i 3137* | Condition implying restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rmo3 3138* | Restricted at-most-one quantifier using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | rmob 3139* | Consequence of "at most one", using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | rmoi 3140* | Consequence of "at most one", using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Syntax | csb 3141 | Extend class notation to include the proper substitution of a class for a set into another class. |
| class ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 | ||
| Definition | df-csb 3142* | Define the proper substitution of a class for a set into another class. The underlined brackets distinguish it from the substitution into a wff, wsbc 3045, to prevent ambiguity. Theorem sbcel1g 3160 shows an example of how ambiguity could arise if we didn't use distinguished brackets. Theorem sbccsbg 3170 recreates substitution into a wff from this definition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} | ||
| Theorem | csb2 3143* | Alternate expression for the proper substitution into a class, without referencing substitution into a wff. Note that 𝑥 can be free in 𝐵 but cannot occur in 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} | ||
| Theorem | csbeq1 3144 | Analog of dfsbcq 3047 for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvcsbw 3145* | Version of cbvcsb 3146 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbvcsb 3146 | Change bound variables in a class substitution. Interestingly, this does not require any bound variable conditions on 𝐴. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbvcsbv 3147* | Change the bound variable of a proper substitution into a class using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | csbeq1d 3148 | Equality deduction for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbid 3149 | Analog of sbid 1823 for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | csbeq1a 3150 | Equality theorem for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | csbco 3151* |
Composition law for chained substitutions into a class.
Use the weaker csbcow 3152 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | csbcow 3152* | Composition law for chained substitutions into a class. Version of csbco 3151 with a disjoint variable condition, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | csbtt 3153 | Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 is not free). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | csbconstgf 3154 | Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 is not free). (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | csbconstg 3155* | Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 is not free). csbconstgf 3154 with distinct variable requirement. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sbcel12g 3156 | Distribute proper substitution through a membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | sbceqg 3157 | Distribute proper substitution through an equality relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcnel12g 3158 | Distribute proper substitution through negated membership. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 18-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∉ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∉ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcne12g 3159 | Distribute proper substitution through an inequality. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 18-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ≠ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcel1g 3160* | Move proper substitution in and out of a membership relation. Note that the scope of [𝐴 / 𝑥] is the wff 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶, whereas the scope of ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ is the class 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | sbceq1g 3161* | Move proper substitution to first argument of an equality. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcel2g 3162* | Move proper substitution in and out of a membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | sbceq2g 3163* | Move proper substitution to second argument of an equality. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | csbcomg 3164* | Commutative law for double substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbeq2 3165 | Substituting into equivalent classes gives equivalent results. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbeq2d 3166 | Formula-building deduction for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbeq2dv 3167* | Formula-building deduction for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbeq2i 3168 | Formula-building inference for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | csbvarg 3169 | The proper substitution of a class for setvar variable results in the class (if the class exists). (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑥 = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sbccsbg 3170* | Substitution into a wff expressed in terms of substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑})) | ||
| Theorem | sbccsb2g 3171 | Substitution into a wff expressed in using substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) | ||
| Theorem | nfcsb1d 3172 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nfcsb1 3173 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | nfcsb1v 3174* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | nfsbcdw 3175* | Version of nfsbcd 3065 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2005.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥[𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | nfsbcw 3176* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class substitution. Version of nfsbc 3066 with a disjoint variable condition, which in the future may make it possible to reduce axiom usage. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | nfcsbd 3177 | Deduction version of nfcsb 3179. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nfcsbw 3178* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. Version of nfcsb 3179 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | nfcsb 3179 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | csbhypf 3180* | Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See sbhypf 2866 for class substitution version. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbiebt 3181* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Closed theorem version of csbiegf 3185.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | csbiedf 3182* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbieb 3183* | Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbiebg 3184* | Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | csbiegf 3185* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbief 3186* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | csbie 3187* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by AV, 2-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | csbied 3188* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbied2 3189* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | csbie2t 3190* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class (closed form of csbie2 3191). (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | csbie2 3191* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2007.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | csbie2g 3192* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. This version of sbcie 3080 avoids a disjointness condition on 𝑥 and 𝐴 by substituting twice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | sbcnestgf 3193 | Nest the composition of two substitutions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜑) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | csbnestgf 3194 | Nest the composition of two substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = ⦋⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | sbcnestg 3195* | Nest the composition of two substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | csbnestg 3196* | Nest the composition of two substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = ⦋⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbnest1g 3197 | Nest the composition of two substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | csbidmg 3198* | Idempotent law for class substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sbcco3g 3199* | Composition of two substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑦]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | csbco3g 3200* | Composition of two class substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐷 = ⦋𝐶 / 𝑦⦌𝐷) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |