Theorem equsalv 1786

Description: An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Version of equsal 1720 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equsalv.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
equsalv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equsalv	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem equsalv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equsalv.nf	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2	1	19.23 1671	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓))
3		equsalv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	3	pm5.74i 179	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓))
5	4	albii 1463	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓))
6		a9ev 1690	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
7	6	a1bi 242	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓))
8	2, 5, 7	3bitr4i 211	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1346  Ⅎwnf 1453  ∃wex 1485

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1440  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-4 1503  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1454

This theorem is referenced by:  nfabdw  2331