Theorem nfabdw 2368

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Version of nfabd 2369 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfabdw.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
nfabdw.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfabdw	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfabdw

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1552	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
2		df-clab 2193	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
3		nfabdw.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
4		nfabdw.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
5	3, 4	alrimi 1546	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
6		nfa1 1565	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
7		sb6 1911	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝜓))
8	7	a1i 9	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝜓)))
9	7	biimpri 133	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝜓) → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
10	9	axc4i 1566	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
11	8, 10	biimtrdi 163	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → ([𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓 → ∀𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓))
12	6, 11	nf5d 2054	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → Ⅎ𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
13	6, 12	nfim1 1595	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
14		sbequ12 1795	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜓 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓))
15	14	imbi2d 230	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)))
16	13, 15	equsalv 1817	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → 𝜓)) ↔ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓))
17	16	bicomi 132	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → 𝜓)))
18		nfv 1552	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧
19		nfnf1 1568	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
20	19	nfal 1600	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
21		sp 1535	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
22	20, 21	nfim1 1595	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → 𝜓)
23	18, 22	nfim 1596	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → 𝜓))
24	23	nfal 1600	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → 𝜓))
25	17, 24	nfxfr 1498	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
26		pm5.5 242	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → ((∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓) ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓))
27	20, 26	nfbidf 1563	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → (Ⅎ𝑥(∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓) ↔ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓))
28	25, 27	mpbii 148	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
29	5, 28	syl 14	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
30	2, 29	nfxfrd 1499	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
31	1, 30	nfcd 2344	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1371  Ⅎwnf 1484  [wsb 1786   ∈ wcel 2177  {cab 2192  Ⅎwnfc 2336

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-11 1530  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2193  df-nfc 2338

This theorem is referenced by:  nfsbcdw  3131  nfcsbw  3134