| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 18 of 165) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | hbnd 1701 | Deduction form of bound-variable hypothesis builder hbn 1700. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | nfnt 1702 | If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, then it is not free in ¬ 𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Dec-2017.) (Revised by BJ, 24-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfnd 1703 | Deduction associated with nfnt 1702. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | nfn 1704 | Inference associated with nfnt 1702. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | nfdc 1705 | If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in DECID 𝜑. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥DECID 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | modal-5 1706 | The analog in our predicate calculus of axiom 5 of modal logic S5. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | 19.9d 1707 | A deduction version of one direction of 19.9 1690. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.9hd 1708 | A deduction version of one direction of 19.9 1690. This is an older variation of this theorem; new proofs should use 19.9d 1707. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | excomim 1709 | One direction of Theorem 19.11 of [Margaris] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | excom 1710 | Theorem 19.11 of [Margaris] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | 19.12 1711 | Theorem 19.12 of [Margaris] p. 89. Assuming the converse is a mistake sometimes made by beginners! (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | 19.19 1712 | Theorem 19.19 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.21-2 1713 | Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 but with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | nf2 1714 | An alternate definition of df-nf 1507, which does not involve nested quantifiers on the same variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | nf3 1715 | An alternate definition of df-nf 1507. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | nf4dc 1716 | Variable 𝑥 is effectively not free in 𝜑 iff 𝜑 is always true or always false, given a decidability condition. The reverse direction, nf4r 1717, holds for all propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥𝜑 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | nf4r 1717 | If 𝜑 is always true or always false, then variable 𝑥 is effectively not free in 𝜑. The converse holds given a decidability condition, as seen at nf4dc 1716. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | 19.36i 1718 | Inference from Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 2-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | 19.36-1 1719 | Closed form of 19.36i 1718. One direction of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. The converse holds in classical logic, but does not hold (for all propositions) in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.37-1 1720 | One direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. The converse holds in classical logic but not, in general, here. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.37aiv 1721* | Inference from Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | 19.38 1722 | Theorem 19.38 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.23t 1723 | Closed form of Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | 19.23 1724 | Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.32dc 1725 | Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90, where 𝜑 is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | 19.32r 1726 | One direction of Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90. The converse holds if 𝜑 is decidable, as seen at 19.32dc 1725. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.31r 1727 | One direction of Theorem 19.31 of [Margaris] p. 90. The converse holds in classical logic, but not intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.44 1728 | Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.45 1729 | Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.34 1730 | Theorem 19.34 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.41h 1731 | Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. New proofs should use 19.41 1732 instead. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.41 1732 | Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.42h 1733 | Theorem 19.42 of [Margaris] p. 90. New proofs should use 19.42 1734 instead. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.42 1734 | Theorem 19.42 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | excom13 1735 | Swap 1st and 3rd existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | exrot3 1736 | Rotate existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | exrot4 1737 | Rotate existential quantifiers twice. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nexr 1738 | Inference from 19.8a 1636. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 26-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | exan 1739 | Place a conjunct in the scope of an existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | hbexd 1740 | Deduction form of bound-variable hypothesis builder hbex 1682. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑦𝜓 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | eeor 1741 | Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | a9e 1742 | At least one individual exists. This is not a theorem of free logic, which is sound in empty domains. For such a logic, we would add this theorem as an axiom of set theory (Axiom 0 of [Kunen] p. 10). In the system consisting of ax-5 1493 through ax-14 2203 and ax-17 1572, all axioms other than ax-9 1577 are believed to be theorems of free logic, although the system without ax-9 1577 is probably not complete in free logic. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | a9ev 1743* | At least one individual exists. Weaker version of a9e 1742. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | ax9o 1744 | An implication related to substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | spimfv 1745* | Specialization, using implicit substitution. Version of spim 1784 with a disjoint variable condition. See spimv 1857 for another variant. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | chvarfv 1746* | Implicit substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a theorem. Version of chvar 1803 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | equid 1747 |
Identity law for equality (reflexivity). Lemma 6 of [Tarski] p. 68.
This is often an axiom of equality in textbook systems, but we don't
need it as an axiom since it can be proved from our other axioms.
This proof is similar to Tarski's and makes use of a dummy variable 𝑦. It also works in intuitionistic logic, unlike some other possible ways of proving this theorem. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | nfequid 1748 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for 𝑥 = 𝑥. This theorem tells us that any variable, including 𝑥, is effectively not free in 𝑥 = 𝑥, even though 𝑥 is technically free according to the traditional definition of free variable. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2011.) (Revised by NM, 21-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | stdpc6 1749 | One of the two equality axioms of standard predicate calculus, called reflexivity of equality. (The other one is stdpc7 1816.) Axiom 6 of [Mendelson] p. 95. Mendelson doesn't say why he prepended the redundant quantifier, but it was probably to be compatible with free logic (which is valid in the empty domain). (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | equcomi 1750 | Commutative law for equality. Lemma 7 of [Tarski] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | ax6evr 1751* | A commuted form of a9ev 1743. The naming reflects how axioms were numbered in the Metamath Proof Explorer as of 2020 (a numbering which we eventually plan to adopt here too, but until this happens everywhere only some theorems will have it). (Contributed by BJ, 7-Dec-2020.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | equcom 1752 | Commutative law for equality. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | equcomd 1753 | Deduction form of equcom 1752, symmetry of equality. For the versions for classes, see eqcom 2231 and eqcomd 2235. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | equcoms 1754 | An inference commuting equality in antecedent. Used to eliminate the need for a syllogism. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | equtr 1755 | A transitive law for equality. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | equtrr 1756 | A transitive law for equality. Lemma L17 in [Megill] p. 446 (p. 14 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | equtr2 1757 | A transitive law for equality. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | equequ1 1758 | An equivalence law for equality. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | equequ2 1759 | An equivalence law for equality. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | ax11i 1760 | Inference that has ax-11 1552 (without ∀𝑦) as its conclusion and does not require ax-10 1551, ax-11 1552, or ax12 1558 for its proof. The hypotheses may be eliminable without one or more of these axioms in special cases. Proof similar to Lemma 16 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | ax10o 1761 |
Show that ax-10o 1762 can be derived from ax-10 1551. An open problem is
whether this theorem can be derived from ax-10 1551 and the others when
ax-11 1552 is replaced with ax-11o 1869. See Theorem ax10 1763
for the
rederivation of ax-10 1551 from ax10o 1761.
Normally, ax10o 1761 should be used rather than ax-10o 1762, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
| Axiom | ax-10o 1762 |
Axiom ax-10o 1762 ("o" for "old") was the
original version of ax-10 1551,
before it was discovered (in May 2008) that the shorter ax-10 1551 could
replace it. It appears as Axiom scheme C11' in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of
the preprint).
This axiom is redundant, as shown by Theorem ax10o 1761. Normally, ax10o 1761 should be used rather than ax-10o 1762, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | ax10 1763 |
Rederivation of ax-10 1551 from original version ax-10o 1762. See Theorem
ax10o 1761 for the derivation of ax-10o 1762 from ax-10 1551.
This theorem should not be referenced in any proof. Instead, use ax-10 1551 above so that uses of ax-10 1551 can be more easily identified. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | hbae 1764 | All variables are effectively bound in an identical variable specifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | nfae 1765 | All variables are effectively bound in an identical variable specifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | hbaes 1766 | Rule that applies hbae 1764 to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | hbnae 1767 | All variables are effectively bound in a distinct variable specifier. Lemma L19 in [Megill] p. 446 (p. 14 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | nfnae 1768 | All variables are effectively bound in a distinct variable specifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | hbnaes 1769 | Rule that applies hbnae 1767 to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | naecoms 1770 | A commutation rule for distinct variable specifiers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | equs4 1771 | Lemma used in proofs of substitution properties. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | equsalh 1772 | A useful equivalence related to substitution. New proofs should use equsal 1773 instead. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | equsal 1773 | A useful equivalence related to substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | equsex 1774 | A useful equivalence related to substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | equsexd 1775 | Deduction form of equsex 1774. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | dral1 1776 | Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | dral2 1777 | Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | drex2 1778 | Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | drnf1 1779 | Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | drnf2 1780 | Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑧𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | spimth 1781 | Closed theorem form of spim 1784. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | spimt 1782 | Closed theorem form of spim 1784. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | spimh 1783 | Specialization, using implicit substitition. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 1784 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 8-May-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | spim 1784 | Specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 1784 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | spimeh 1785 | Existential introduction, using implicit substitition. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | spimed 1786 | Deduction version of spime 1787. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜒 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | spime 1787 | Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbv3 1788 | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because proofs are encouraged to use the weaker cbv3v 1790 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbv3h 1789 | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbv3v 1790* | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv3 1788 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbv1 1791 | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Revised to format hypotheses to common style. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbv1h 1792 | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbv1v 1793* | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 16-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbv2h 1794 | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbv2 1795 | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Revised to align format of hypotheses to common style. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbv2w 1796* | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv2 1795 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvalv1 1797* | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbval 1800 with a disjoint variable condition. See cbvalvw 1966 for a version with two disjoint variable conditions, and cbvalv 1964 for another variant. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvexv1 1798* | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvex 1802 with a disjoint variable condition. See cbvexvw 1967 for a version with two disjoint variable conditions, and cbvexv 1965 for another variant. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvalh 1799 | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitition. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbval 1800 | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |