Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ad4ant134 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ad4ant3.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ad4ant134 | ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ad4ant3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | |
2 | 1 | 3expa 1120 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
3 | 2 | adantllr 719 | 1 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 ∧ w3a 1089 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-3an 1091 |
This theorem is referenced by: ad5ant245 1363 ad5ant134 1369 ad5ant135 1370 ad5ant145 1371 ralxfrd2 5305 gruwun 10427 lemul12b 11689 initoeu1 17517 termoeu1 17524 quscrng 20278 metss 23406 wlkswwlksf1o 27963 climxlim2lem 43064 smflimlem4 43984 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |