Theorem axbnd 2767

Description: Axiom of Bundling (intuitionistic logic axiom ax-bnd). In classical logic, this and axi12 2765 are fairly straightforward consequences of axc9 2355. But in intuitionistic logic, it is not easy to add the extra ∀𝑥 to axi12 2765 and so we treat the two as separate axioms. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Apr-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axbnd	⊢ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)))

Proof of Theorem axbnd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfae 2412	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥
2		nfae 2412	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦
3	1, 2	nfor 1886	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦)
4	3	19.32 2200	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) ∨ ∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)) ↔ ((∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
5		orass 916	. . 3 ⊢ (((∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)) ↔ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦))))
6	4, 5	bitri 276	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) ∨ ∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)) ↔ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦))))
7		axi12 2765	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ ∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
8		orass 916	. . 3 ⊢ (((∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) ∨ ∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)) ↔ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ ∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦))))
9	7, 8	mpbir 232	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) ∨ ∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦))
10	6, 9	mpgbi 1780	1 ⊢ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ (∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 842  ∀wal 1520

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1777  ax-4 1791  ax-5 1888  ax-6 1947  ax-7 1992  ax-10 2112  ax-11 2126  ax-12 2141  ax-13 2344

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 843  df-tru 1525  df-ex 1762  df-nf 1766

This theorem is referenced by: (None)