| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 382 of 498) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30880) |
(30881-32403) |
(32404-49791) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | exlimddvfi 38101 | A lemma for eliminating an existential quantifier, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜃) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜃 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜃 ↔ 𝜂) & ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | sbceq1ddi 38102 | A lemma for eliminating inequality, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) & ⊢ ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜒 ↔ 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | sbccom2lem 38103* | Lemma for sbccom2 38104. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbccom2 38104* | Commutative law for double class substitution. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbccom2f 38105* | Commutative law for double class substitution, with nonfree variable condition. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbccom2fi 38106* | Commutative law for double class substitution, with nonfree variable condition and in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 1-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶 & ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑦]𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | csbcom2fi 38107* | Commutative law for double class substitution in a class, with nonfree variable condition and in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 4-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶 & ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 = 𝐸 ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐷 = ⦋𝐶 / 𝑦⦌𝐸 | ||
A collection of Tseitin axioms used to convert a wff to Conjunctive Normal Form. | ||
| Theorem | fald 38108 | Refutation of falsity, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ¬ ⊥) | ||
| Theorem | tsim1 38109 | A Tseitin axiom for logical implication, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsim2 38110 | A Tseitin axiom for logical implication, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsim3 38111 | A Tseitin axiom for logical implication, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi1 38112 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi2 38113 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi3 38114 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi4 38115 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo1 38116 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo2 38117 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo3 38118 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo4 38119 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsan1 38120 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsan2 38121 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsan3 38122 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsna1 38123 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsna2 38124 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsna3 38125 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsor1 38126 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsor2 38127 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsor3 38128 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3an1 38129 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3an2 38130 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3an3 38131 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜒 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3or1 38132 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3or2 38133 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3or3 38134 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
A collection of theorems for commuting equalities (or biconditionals) with other constructs. | ||
| Theorem | iuneq2f 38135 | Equality deduction for indexed union. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | rabeq12f 38136 | Equality deduction for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | csbeq12 38137 | Equality deduction for substitution in class. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | sbeqi 38138 | Equality deduction for substitution. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ralbi12f 38139 | Equality deduction for restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | oprabbi 38140 | Equality deduction for class abstraction of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | mpobi123f 38141* | Equality deduction for maps-to notations with two arguments. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐷 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝐸 = 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | iuneq12f 38142 | Equality deduction for indexed unions. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | iineq12f 38143 | Equality deduction for indexed intersections. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | opabbi 38144 | Equality deduction for class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | mptbi12f 38145 | Equality deduction for maps-to notations. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐷 = 𝐸) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐷) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐸)) | ||
Work in progress or things that do not belong anywhere else. | ||
| Theorem | orcomdd 38146 | Commutativity of logic disjunction, in double deduction form. Should not be moved to main, see PR #3034 in Github. Use orcomd 871 instead. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | scottexf 38147* | A version of scottex 9800 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | scott0f 38148* | A version of scott0 9801 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | scottn0f 38149* | A version of scott0f 38148 with inequalities instead of equalities. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ac6s3f 38150* | Generalization of the Axiom of Choice to classes, with bound-variable hypothesis. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ac6s6 38151* | Generalization of the Axiom of Choice to classes, moving the existence condition in the consequent. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ac6s6f 38152* | Generalization of the Axiom of Choice to classes, moving the existence condition in the consequent. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 20-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Syntax | cxrn 38153 | Extend the definition of a class to include the range Cartesian product class. |
| class (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) | ||
| Syntax | ccoss 38154 | Extend the definition of a class to include the class of cosets by a class. (Read: the class of cosets by 𝑅.) |
| class ≀ 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | ccoels 38155 | Extend the definition of a class to include the class of coelements on a class. (Read: the class of coelements on 𝐴.) |
| class ∼ 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | crels 38156 | Extend the definition of a class to include the relation class. |
| class Rels | ||
| Syntax | cssr 38157 | Extend the definition of a class to include the subset class. |
| class S | ||
| Syntax | crefs 38158 | Extend the definition of a class to include the reflexivity class. |
| class Refs | ||
| Syntax | crefrels 38159 | Extend the definition of a class to include the reflexive relations class. |
| class RefRels | ||
| Syntax | wrefrel 38160 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the reflexive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a reflexive relation.) |
| wff RefRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | ccnvrefs 38161 | Extend the definition of a class to include the converse reflexivity class. |
| class CnvRefs | ||
| Syntax | ccnvrefrels 38162 | Extend the definition of a class to include the converse reflexive relations class. |
| class CnvRefRels | ||
| Syntax | wcnvrefrel 38163 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a converse reflexive relation.) |
| wff CnvRefRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | csyms 38164 | Extend the definition of a class to include the symmetry class. |
| class Syms | ||
| Syntax | csymrels 38165 | Extend the definition of a class to include the symmetry relations class. |
| class SymRels | ||
| Syntax | wsymrel 38166 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the symmetry relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a symmetric relation.) |
| wff SymRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | ctrs 38167 | Extend the definition of a class to include the transitivity class (but cf. the transitive class defined in df-tr 5203). |
| class Trs | ||
| Syntax | ctrrels 38168 | Extend the definition of a class to include the transitive relations class. |
| class TrRels | ||
| Syntax | wtrrel 38169 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the transitive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a transitive relation.) |
| wff TrRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | ceqvrels 38170 | Extend the definition of a class to include the equivalence relations class. |
| class EqvRels | ||
| Syntax | weqvrel 38171 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the equivalence relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an equivalence relation.) |
| wff EqvRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | ccoeleqvrels 38172 | Extend the definition of a class to include the coelement equivalence relations class. |
| class CoElEqvRels | ||
| Syntax | wcoeleqvrel 38173 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the coelement equivalence relation predicate. (Read: the coelement equivalence relation on 𝐴.) |
| wff CoElEqvRel 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | credunds 38174 | Extend the definition of a class to include the redundancy class. |
| class Redunds | ||
| Syntax | wredund 38175 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the redundancy predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is redundant with respect to 𝐵 in 𝐶.) |
| wff 𝐴 Redund 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 | ||
| Syntax | wredundp 38176 | Extend wff definition to include the redundancy operator for propositions. |
| wff redund (𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) | ||
| Syntax | cdmqss 38177 | Extend the definition of a class to include the domain quotients class. |
| class DomainQss | ||
| Syntax | wdmqs 38178 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the domain quotient predicate. (Read: the domain quotient of 𝑅 is 𝐴.) |
| wff 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | cers 38179 | Extend the definition of a class to include the equivalence relations on their domain quotients class. |
| class Ers | ||
| Syntax | werALTV 38180 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the equivalence relation on its domain quotient predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an equivalence relation on its domain quotient 𝐴.) |
| wff 𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | ccomembers 38181 | Extend the definition of a class to include the comember equivalence relations class. |
| class CoMembErs | ||
| Syntax | wcomember 38182 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the comember equivalence relation predicate. (Read: the comember equivalence relation on 𝐴, or, the restricted coelement equivalence relation on its domain quotient 𝐴.) |
| wff CoMembEr 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | cfunss 38183 | Extend the definition of a class to include the function set class. |
| class Funss | ||
| Syntax | cfunsALTV 38184 | Extend the definition of a class to include the functions class, i.e., the function relations class. |
| class FunsALTV | ||
| Syntax | wfunALTV 38185 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate, i.e., the function relation predicate. (Read: 𝐹 is a function.) |
| wff FunALTV 𝐹 | ||
| Syntax | cdisjss 38186 | Extend the definition of a class to include the disjoint set class. |
| class Disjss | ||
| Syntax | cdisjs 38187 | Extend the definition of a class to include the disjoints class, i.e., the disjoint relations class. |
| class Disjs | ||
| Syntax | wdisjALTV 38188 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the disjoint predicate, i.e., the disjoint relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a disjoint.) |
| wff Disj 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | celdisjs 38189 | Extend the definition of a class to include the disjoint elements class, i.e., the disjoint element relations class. |
| class ElDisjs | ||
| Syntax | weldisj 38190 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the disjoint element predicate, i.e., the disjoint element relation predicate. (Read: the elements of 𝐴 are disjoint.) |
| wff ElDisj 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | wantisymrel 38191 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the antisymmetry relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an antisymmetric relation.) |
| wff AntisymRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | cparts 38192 | Extend the definition of a class to include the partitions class, i.e., the partition relations class. |
| class Parts | ||
| Syntax | wpart 38193 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the partition predicate, i.e., the partition relation predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a partition by 𝑅.) |
| wff 𝑅 Part 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | cmembparts 38194 | Extend the definition of a class to include the member partitions class, i.e., the member partition relations class. |
| class MembParts | ||
| Syntax | wmembpart 38195 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the member partition predicate, i.e., the member partition relation predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a member partition.) |
| wff MembPart 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | el2v1 38196 | New way (elv 3443, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | el3v1 38197 | New way (elv 3443, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | el3v2 38198 | New way (elv 3443, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | el3v12 38199 | New way (elv 3443, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | el3v13 38200 | New way (elv 3443, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |