| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 382 of 497) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30845) |
(30846-32368) |
(32369-49617) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | tsim2 38101 | A Tseitin axiom for logical implication, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsim3 38102 | A Tseitin axiom for logical implication, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi1 38103 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi2 38104 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi3 38105 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsbi4 38106 | A Tseitin axiom for logical biconditional, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo1 38107 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo2 38108 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo3 38109 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsxo4 38110 | A Tseitin axiom for logical exclusive disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsan1 38111 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsan2 38112 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsan3 38113 | A Tseitin axiom for logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsna1 38114 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsna2 38115 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsna3 38116 | A Tseitin axiom for logical incompatibility, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 24-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsor1 38117 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsor2 38118 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | tsor3 38119 | A Tseitin axiom for logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3an1 38120 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3an2 38121 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3an3 38122 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical conjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜒 ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3or1 38123 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3or2 38124 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | ts3or3 38125 | A Tseitin axiom for triple logical disjunction, in deduction form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 25-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 → (¬ 𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
A collection of theorems for commuting equalities (or biconditionals) with other constructs. | ||
| Theorem | iuneq2f 38126 | Equality deduction for indexed union. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | rabeq12f 38127 | Equality deduction for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | csbeq12 38128 | Equality deduction for substitution in class. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | sbeqi 38129 | Equality deduction for substitution. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ralbi12f 38130 | Equality deduction for restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | oprabbi 38131 | Equality deduction for class abstraction of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | mpobi123f 38132* | Equality deduction for maps-to notations with two arguments. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐷 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝐸 = 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | iuneq12f 38133 | Equality deduction for indexed unions. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | iineq12f 38134 | Equality deduction for indexed intersections. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | opabbi 38135 | Equality deduction for class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
| Theorem | mptbi12f 38136 | Equality deduction for maps-to notations. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐷 = 𝐸) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐷) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐸)) | ||
Work in progress or things that do not belong anywhere else. | ||
| Theorem | orcomdd 38137 | Commutativity of logic disjunction, in double deduction form. Should not be moved to main, see PR #3034 in Github. Use orcomd 871 instead. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Mar-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | scottexf 38138* | A version of scottex 9897 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | scott0f 38139* | A version of scott0 9898 with nonfree variables instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | scottn0f 38140* | A version of scott0f 38139 with inequalities instead of equalities. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ac6s3f 38141* | Generalization of the Axiom of Choice to classes, with bound-variable hypothesis. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ac6s6 38142* | Generalization of the Axiom of Choice to classes, moving the existence condition in the consequent. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 19-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ac6s6f 38143* | Generalization of the Axiom of Choice to classes, moving the existence condition in the consequent. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 20-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Syntax | cxrn 38144 | Extend the definition of a class to include the range Cartesian product class. |
| class (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) | ||
| Syntax | ccoss 38145 | Extend the definition of a class to include the class of cosets by a class. (Read: the class of cosets by 𝑅.) |
| class ≀ 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | ccoels 38146 | Extend the definition of a class to include the class of coelements on a class. (Read: the class of coelements on 𝐴.) |
| class ∼ 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | crels 38147 | Extend the definition of a class to include the relation class. |
| class Rels | ||
| Syntax | cssr 38148 | Extend the definition of a class to include the subset class. |
| class S | ||
| Syntax | crefs 38149 | Extend the definition of a class to include the reflexivity class. |
| class Refs | ||
| Syntax | crefrels 38150 | Extend the definition of a class to include the reflexive relations class. |
| class RefRels | ||
| Syntax | wrefrel 38151 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the reflexive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a reflexive relation.) |
| wff RefRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | ccnvrefs 38152 | Extend the definition of a class to include the converse reflexivity class. |
| class CnvRefs | ||
| Syntax | ccnvrefrels 38153 | Extend the definition of a class to include the converse reflexive relations class. |
| class CnvRefRels | ||
| Syntax | wcnvrefrel 38154 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a converse reflexive relation.) |
| wff CnvRefRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | csyms 38155 | Extend the definition of a class to include the symmetry class. |
| class Syms | ||
| Syntax | csymrels 38156 | Extend the definition of a class to include the symmetry relations class. |
| class SymRels | ||
| Syntax | wsymrel 38157 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the symmetry relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a symmetric relation.) |
| wff SymRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | ctrs 38158 | Extend the definition of a class to include the transitivity class (but cf. the transitive class defined in df-tr 5230). |
| class Trs | ||
| Syntax | ctrrels 38159 | Extend the definition of a class to include the transitive relations class. |
| class TrRels | ||
| Syntax | wtrrel 38160 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the transitive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a transitive relation.) |
| wff TrRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | ceqvrels 38161 | Extend the definition of a class to include the equivalence relations class. |
| class EqvRels | ||
| Syntax | weqvrel 38162 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the equivalence relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an equivalence relation.) |
| wff EqvRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | ccoeleqvrels 38163 | Extend the definition of a class to include the coelement equivalence relations class. |
| class CoElEqvRels | ||
| Syntax | wcoeleqvrel 38164 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the coelement equivalence relation predicate. (Read: the coelement equivalence relation on 𝐴.) |
| wff CoElEqvRel 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | credunds 38165 | Extend the definition of a class to include the redundancy class. |
| class Redunds | ||
| Syntax | wredund 38166 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the redundancy predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is redundant with respect to 𝐵 in 𝐶.) |
| wff 𝐴 Redund 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 | ||
| Syntax | wredundp 38167 | Extend wff definition to include the redundancy operator for propositions. |
| wff redund (𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) | ||
| Syntax | cdmqss 38168 | Extend the definition of a class to include the domain quotients class. |
| class DomainQss | ||
| Syntax | wdmqs 38169 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the domain quotient predicate. (Read: the domain quotient of 𝑅 is 𝐴.) |
| wff 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | cers 38170 | Extend the definition of a class to include the equivalence relations on their domain quotients class. |
| class Ers | ||
| Syntax | werALTV 38171 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the equivalence relation on its domain quotient predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an equivalence relation on its domain quotient 𝐴.) |
| wff 𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | ccomembers 38172 | Extend the definition of a class to include the comember equivalence relations class. |
| class CoMembErs | ||
| Syntax | wcomember 38173 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the comember equivalence relation predicate. (Read: the comember equivalence relation on 𝐴, or, the restricted coelement equivalence relation on its domain quotient 𝐴.) |
| wff CoMembEr 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | cfunss 38174 | Extend the definition of a class to include the function set class. |
| class Funss | ||
| Syntax | cfunsALTV 38175 | Extend the definition of a class to include the functions class, i.e., the function relations class. |
| class FunsALTV | ||
| Syntax | wfunALTV 38176 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate, i.e., the function relation predicate. (Read: 𝐹 is a function.) |
| wff FunALTV 𝐹 | ||
| Syntax | cdisjss 38177 | Extend the definition of a class to include the disjoint set class. |
| class Disjss | ||
| Syntax | cdisjs 38178 | Extend the definition of a class to include the disjoints class, i.e., the disjoint relations class. |
| class Disjs | ||
| Syntax | wdisjALTV 38179 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the disjoint predicate, i.e., the disjoint relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a disjoint.) |
| wff Disj 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | celdisjs 38180 | Extend the definition of a class to include the disjoint elements class, i.e., the disjoint element relations class. |
| class ElDisjs | ||
| Syntax | weldisj 38181 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the disjoint element predicate, i.e., the disjoint element relation predicate. (Read: the elements of 𝐴 are disjoint.) |
| wff ElDisj 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | wantisymrel 38182 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the antisymmetry relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an antisymmetric relation.) |
| wff AntisymRel 𝑅 | ||
| Syntax | cparts 38183 | Extend the definition of a class to include the partitions class, i.e., the partition relations class. |
| class Parts | ||
| Syntax | wpart 38184 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the partition predicate, i.e., the partition relation predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a partition by 𝑅.) |
| wff 𝑅 Part 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | cmembparts 38185 | Extend the definition of a class to include the member partitions class, i.e., the member partition relations class. |
| class MembParts | ||
| Syntax | wmembpart 38186 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the member partition predicate, i.e., the member partition relation predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a member partition.) |
| wff MembPart 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | el2v1 38187 | New way (elv 3464, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | el3v1 38188 | New way (elv 3464, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | el3v2 38189 | New way (elv 3464, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | el3v12 38190 | New way (elv 3464, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | el3v13 38191 | New way (elv 3464, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | el3v23 38192 | New way (elv 3464, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | anan 38193 | Multiple commutations in conjunction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏)) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))) | ||
| Theorem | triantru3 38194 | A wff is equivalent to its conjunctions with truths. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Nov-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | biorfd 38195 | A wff is equivalent to its disjunction with falsehood, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | eqbrtr 38196 | Substitution of equal classes in binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | eqbrb 38197 | Substitution of equal classes in a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | eqeltr 38198 | Substitution of equal classes into element relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | eqelb 38199 | Substitution of equal classes into element relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | eqeqan2d 38200 | Implication of introducing a new equality. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |