P. 382 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 38101-38200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bj-rest10 38101	An elementwise intersection on a nonempty family by the empty set is the singleton on the empty set. TODO: this generalizes rest0 23492 and could replace it. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ≠ ∅ → (𝑋 ↾t ∅) = {∅}))
Theorem	bj-rest10b 38102	Alternate version of bj-rest10 38101. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {∅}) → (𝑋 ↾t ∅) = {∅})
Theorem	bj-restn0 38103	An elementwise intersection on a nonempty family is nonempty. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ≠ ∅ → (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴) ≠ ∅))
Theorem	bj-restn0b 38104	Alternate version of bj-restn0 38103. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	bj-restpw 38105	The elementwise intersection on a powerset is the powerset of the intersection. This allows to prove for instance that the topology induced on a subset by the discrete topology is the discrete topology on that subset. See also restdis 23501 (which uses distop 23318 and restopn2 23500). (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝒫 𝑌 ↾t 𝐴) = 𝒫 (𝑌 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-rest0 38106	An elementwise intersection on a family containing the empty set contains the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (∅ ∈ 𝑋 → ∅ ∈ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-restb 38107	An elementwise intersection by a set on a family containing a superset of that set contains that set. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-restv 38108	An elementwise intersection by a subset on a family containing the whole set contains the whole subset. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑋 ∧ ∪ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-resta 38109	An elementwise intersection by a set on a family containing that set contains that set. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-restuni 38110	The union of an elementwise intersection by a set is equal to the intersection with that set of the union of the family. See also restuni 23485 and restuni2 23490. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴) = (∪ 𝑋 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-restuni2 38111	The union of an elementwise intersection on a family of sets by a subset is equal to that subset. See also restuni 23485 and restuni2 23490. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑋) → ∪ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-restreg 38112	A reformulation of the axiom of regularity using elementwise intersection. (RK: might have to be placed later since theorems in this section are to be moved early (in the section related to the algebra of sets).) (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↾t 𝐴))
21.20.5.24  Moore collections (complements)
Theorem	bj-raldifsn 38113*	All elements of a set satisfy a given property if and only if all but one satisfy that property and that one also does. Typically, this can be used for characterizations that are proved using different methods for a given element and for all others, for instance zero and nonzero numbers, or the empty set and nonempty sets. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	bj-0int 38114*	If 𝐴 is a collection of subsets of 𝑋, like a Moore collection or a topology, two equivalent ways to say that arbitrary intersections of elements of 𝐴 relative to 𝑋 belong to some class 𝐵: the LHS singles out the empty intersection (the empty intersection relative to 𝑋 is 𝑋 and the intersection of a nonempty family of subsets of 𝑋 is included in 𝑋, so there is no need to intersect it with 𝑋). In typical applications, 𝐵 is 𝐴 itself. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-mooreset 38115*	A Moore collection is a set. Therefore, the class Moore of all Moore sets defined in df-bj-moore 38117 is actually the class of all Moore collections. This is also illustrated by the lack of sethood condition in bj-ismoore 38118. The closed sets of a topology form a Moore collection, so a topology is a set, and this remark also applies to many other families of sets (namely, as soon as the whole set is required to be a set of the family, then the associated kind of family has no proper classes: that this condition suffices to impose sethood can be seen in this proof, which relies crucially on uniexr 7777). Note: if, in the above predicate, we substitute 𝒫 𝑋 for 𝐴, then the last ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 could be weakened to ⊆ 𝑋, and then the predicate would be obviously satisfied since ⊢ ∪ 𝒫 𝑋 = 𝑋 (unipw 5417), making 𝒫 𝑋 a Moore collection in this weaker sense, for any class 𝑋, even proper, but the addition of this single case does not add anything interesting. Instead, we have the biconditional bj-discrmoore 38124. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Syntax	cmoore 38116	Syntax for the class of Moore collections.
class Moore
Definition	df-bj-moore 38117*	Define the class of Moore collections. This is indeed the class of all Moore collections since these all are sets, as proved in bj-mooreset 38115, and as illustrated by the lack of sethood condition in bj-ismoore 38118. This is to df-mre 17761 (defining Moore) what df-top 23217 (defining Top) is to df-topon 23234 (defining TopOn). For the sake of consistency, the function defined at df-mre 17761 should be denoted by "MooreOn". Note: df-mre 17761 singles out the empty intersection. This is not necessary. It could be written instead ⊢ Moore = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(𝑥 ∩ ∩ 𝑧) ∈ 𝑦}) and the equivalence of both definitions is proved by bj-0int 38114. There is no added generality in defining a "Moore predicate" for arbitrary classes, since a Moore class satisfying such a predicate is automatically a set (see bj-mooreset 38115). TODO: move to the main section. For many families of sets, one can define both the function associating to each set the set of families of that kind on it (like df-mre 17761 and df-topon 23234) or the class of all families of that kind, independent of a base set (like df-bj-moore 38117 or df-top 23217). In general, the former will be more useful and the extra generality of the latter is not necessary. Moore collections, however, are particular in that they are more ubiquitous and are used in a wide variety of applications (for many families of sets, the family of families of a given kind is often a Moore collection, for instance). Therefore, in the case of Moore families, having both definitions is useful. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ Moore = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥(∪ 𝑥 ∩ ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑥}
Theorem	bj-ismoore 38118*	Characterization of Moore collections. There is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is implied by either side (this is obvious for the LHS, and is the content of bj-mooreset 38115 for the RHS). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-ismoored0 38119	Necessary condition to be a Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-ismoored 38120	Necessary condition to be a Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-ismoored2 38121	Necessary condition to be a Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-ismooredr 38122*	Sufficient condition to be a Moore collection. There is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is a consequence of the only hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-ismooredr2 38123*	Sufficient condition to be a Moore collection (variant of bj-ismooredr 38122 singling out the empty intersection). There is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is a consequence of the first hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅)) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-discrmoore 38124	The powerclass 𝒫 𝐴 is a Moore collection if and only if 𝐴 is a set. It is then called the discrete Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-0nmoore 38125	The empty set is not a Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ Moore
Theorem	bj-snmoore 38126	A singleton is a Moore collection. See bj-snmooreb 38127 for a biconditional version. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-snmooreb 38127	A singleton is a Moore collection, biconditional version of bj-snmoore 38126. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 10-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝐴} ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-prmoore 38128	A pair formed of two nested sets is a Moore collection. (If in the statement 𝐵 is a proper class, then the result follows from bj-snmoore 38126). A direct consequence is bj-pr0moore 38129. More generally, any nonempty well-ordered chain of sets that is a set is a Moore collection. We also have the biconditional ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ Moore ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))). (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-pr0moore 38129	A pair containing the empty set is a Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2026.)
⊢ {∅, 𝐴} ∈ Moore
21.20.5.25  Maps-to notation for functions with three arguments
Theorem	bj-0nelmpt 38130	The empty set is not an element of a function (given in maps-to notation). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Dec-2020.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-mptval 38131	Value of a function given in maps-to notation. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Dec-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)‘𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)𝑌)))
Theorem	bj-dfmpoa 38132*	An equivalent definition of df-mpo 7425. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = {⟨𝑠, 𝑡⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑠 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑡 = 𝐶)}
Theorem	bj-mpomptALT 38133*	Alternate proof of mpompt 7534. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)
21.20.5.26  Currying Currying and uncurrying. See also df-cur 8287 and df-unc 8288. Contrary to these, the definitions in this section are parameterized.
Syntax	csethom 38134	Syntax for the set of set morphisms.
class ⟶Set
Definition	df-bj-sethom 38135*	Define the set of functions (morphisms of sets) between two sets. Same as df-map 8852 with arguments swapped. TODO: prove the same staple lemmas as for ↑m. Remark: one may define ⟶Set = (𝑥 ∈ dom Struct , 𝑦 ∈ dom Struct ↦ {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(Base‘𝑥)⟶(Base‘𝑦)}) so that for morphisms between other structures, one could write ... = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑥 ⟶Set 𝑦) ∣ ...}. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ⟶Set = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝑦})
Syntax	ctophom 38136	Syntax for the set of topological morphisms.
class ⟶Top
Definition	df-bj-tophom 38137*	Define the set of continuous functions (morphisms of topological spaces) between two topological spaces. Similar to df-cn 23550 (which is in terms of topologies instead of topological spaces). (Contributed by BJ, 10-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ⟶Top = (𝑥 ∈ TopSp, 𝑦 ∈ TopSp ↦ {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝑥) ⟶Set (Base‘𝑦)) ∣ ∀𝑢 ∈ (TopOpen‘𝑦)(◡𝑓 “ 𝑢) ∈ (TopOpen‘𝑥)})
Syntax	cmgmhom 38138	Syntax for the set of magma morphisms.
class ⎯⎯⟶Mgm
Definition	df-bj-mgmhom 38139*	Define the set of magma morphisms between two magmas. If domain and codomain are semigroups, monoids, or groups, then one obtains the set of morphisms of these structures. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ⎯⎯⟶Mgm = (𝑥 ∈ Mgm, 𝑦 ∈ Mgm ↦ {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝑥) ⟶Set (Base‘𝑦)) ∣ ∀𝑢 ∈ (Base‘𝑥)∀𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑥)(𝑓‘(𝑢(+g‘𝑥)𝑣)) = ((𝑓‘𝑢)(+g‘𝑦)(𝑓‘𝑣))})
Syntax	ctopmgmhom 38140	Syntax for the set of topological magma morphisms.
class ⎯⎯⎯⎯⟶TopMgm
Definition	df-bj-topmgmhom 38141*	Define the set of topological magma morphisms (continuous magma morphisms) between two topological magmas. If domain and codomain are topological semigroups, monoids, or groups, then one obtains the set of morphisms of these structures. This definition is currently stated with topological monoid domain and codomain, since topological magmas are currently not defined in set.mm. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ⎯⎯⎯⎯⟶TopMgm = (𝑥 ∈ TopMnd, 𝑦 ∈ TopMnd ↦ ((𝑥 ⟶Top 𝑦) ∩ (𝑥 ⎯⎯⟶Mgm 𝑦)))
Syntax	ccur- 38142	Syntax for the parameterized currying function.
class curry_
Definition	df-bj-cur 38143*	Define currying. See also df-cur 8287. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
⊢ curry_ = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((𝑥 × 𝑦) ⟶Set 𝑧) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ (𝑏 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ (𝑓‘⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩)))))
Syntax	cunc- 38144	Notation for the parameterized uncurrying function.
class uncurry_
Definition	df-bj-unc 38145*	Define uncurrying. See also df-unc 8288. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
⊢ uncurry_ = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥 ⟶Set (𝑦 ⟶Set 𝑧)) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑥, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑎)‘𝑏))))
21.20.5.27  Setting components of extensible structures Groundwork for changing the definition, syntax and token for component-setting in extensible structures. See https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2401
Syntax	cstrset 38146	Syntax for component-setting in extensible structures.
class [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆
Definition	df-strset 38147	Component-setting in extensible structures. Define the extensible structure [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆, which is like the extensible structure 𝑆 except that the value 𝐵 has been put in the slot 𝐴 (replacing the current value if there was already one). In such expressions, 𝐴 is generally substituted for slot mnemonics like Base or +g or dist. The V in this definition was chosen to be closer to df-sets 17347, but since extensible structures are functions on ℕ, it will be more natural to replace it with ℕ when df-strset 38147 becomes the main definition. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Feb-2022.)
⊢ [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆 = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {(𝐴‘ndx)})) ∪ {⟨(𝐴‘ndx), 𝐵⟩})
Theorem	setsstrset 38148	Relation between df-sets 17347 and df-strset 38147. Temporary theorem kept during the transition from the former to the latter. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆 = (𝑆 sSet ⟨(𝐴‘ndx), 𝐵⟩))
21.20.6  Extended real and complex numbers, real and complex projective lines In this section, we indroduce several supersets of the set ℝ of real numbers and the set ℂ of complex numbers. Once they are given their usual topologies, which are locally compact, both topological spaces have a one-point compactification. They are denoted by ℝ̂ and ℂ̂ respectively, defined in df-bj-cchat 38247 and df-bj-rrhat 38249, and the point at infinity is denoted by ∞, defined in df-bj-infty 38245. Both ℝ and ℂ also have "directional compactifications", denoted respectively by ℝ̅, defined in df-bj-rrbar 38243 (already defined as ℝ*, see df-xr 11350) and ℂ̅, defined in df-bj-ccbar 38230. Since ℂ̅ does not seem to be standard, we describe it in some detail. It is obtained by adding to ℂ a "point at infinity at the end of each ray with origin at 0". Although ℂ̅ is not an important object in itself, the motivation for introducing it is to provide a common superset to both ℝ̅ and ℂ and to define algebraic operations (addition, opposite, multiplication, inverse) as widely as reasonably possible. Mathematically, ℂ̅ is the quotient of ((ℂ × ℝ≥0) ∖ {⟨0, 0⟩}) by the diagonal multiplicative action of ℝ>0 (think of the closed "northern hemisphere" in ℝ^3 identified with (ℂ × ℝ), that each open ray from 0 included in the closed northern half-space intersects exactly once). Since in set.mm, we want to have a genuine inclusion ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅, we instead define ℂ̅ as the (disjoint) union of ℂ with a circle at infinity denoted by ℂ∞. To have a genuine inclusion ℝ̅ ⊆ ℂ̅, we define +∞ and -∞ as certain points in ℂ∞. Thanks to this framework, one has the genuine inclusions ℝ ⊆ ℝ̅ and ℝ ⊆ ℝ̂ and similarly ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅ and ℂ ⊆ ℂ̂. Furthermore, one has ℝ ⊆ ℂ as well as ℝ̅ ⊆ ℂ̅ and ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂. Furthermore, we define the main algebraic operations on (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂), which is not very mathematical, but "overloads" the operations, so that one can use the same notation in all cases.
21.20.6.1  Complements on class abstractions of ordered pairs and binary relations
Theorem	bj-nfald 38149	Variant of nfald 2358. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	bj-nfexd 38150	Variant of nfexd 2359. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cgsex2gd 38151*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) Adapt cgsex2g 3495 to deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 28-Mar-2026.) Do not use cgsex2g 3495. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))
Theorem	copsex2gd 38152*	Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) Use a similar proof to copsex4g 5466 to reduce axiom usage. (Revised by SN, 1-Sep-2024.) Adapt copsex2g 5464 $p to deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 28-Mar-2026.) Do not use copsex2g 5464. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	copsex2d 38153*	Implicit substitution deduction for ordered pairs. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	copsex2b 38154*	Biconditional form of copsex2d 38153. TODO: prove a relative version, that is, with ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊...(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊). (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	opelopabd 38155*	Membership of an ordered pair in a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	opelopabb 38156*	Membership of an ordered pair in a class abstraction of ordered pairs, biconditional form. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	opelopabbv 38157*	Membership of an ordered pair in a class abstraction of ordered pairs, biconditional form. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	bj-opelrelex 38158	The coordinates of an ordered pair that belongs to a relation are sets. TODO: Slightly shorter than brrelex12 5702, which could be proved from it. The first antecedent would not be needed if using df-bj-2upl 38016, by bj-2uplex 38027. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-opelresdm 38159	If an ordered pair is in a restricted binary relation, then its first component is an element of the restricting class. See also opelres 5975. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝑅 ↾ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	bj-brresdm 38160	If two classes are related by a restricted binary relation, then the first class is an element of the restricting class. See also brres 5976 and brrelex1 5703. Remark: there are many pairs like bj-opelresdm 38159 / bj-brresdm 38160, where one uses membership of ordered pairs and the other, related classes (for instance, bj-opelresdm 38159 / brrelex12 5702 or the opelopabg 5512 / brabg 5513 family). They are straightforwardly equivalent by df-br 5103. The latter is indeed a very direct definition, introducing a "shorthand", and barely necessary, were it not for the frequency of the expression 𝐴𝑅𝐵. Therefore, in the spirit of "definitions are here to be used", most theorems, apart from the most elementary ones, should only have the "br" version, not the "opel" one. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ↾ 𝑋)𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	brabd0 38161*	Expressing that two sets are related by a binary relation which is expressed as a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	brabd 38162*	Expressing that two sets are related by a binary relation which is expressed as a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	bj-brab2a1 38163*	"Unbounded" version of brab2a 5743. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜓))
21.20.6.2  Identity relation (complements) Complements on the identity relation.
Theorem	bj-opabssvv 38164*	A variant of relopabiv 5797 (which could be proved from it, similarly to relxp 5668 from xpss 5666). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Dec-2023.)
⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ (V × V)
Theorem	bj-funidres 38165	The restricted identity relation is a function. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) TODO: relabel funi 6572 to funid.
⊢ Fun ( I ↾ 𝑉)
Theorem	bj-opelidb 38166	Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation. Remark: in deduction-style proofs, one could save a few syntactic steps by using another antecedent than ⊤ which already appears in the proof. Here for instance this could be the definition I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦} but this would make the proof less easy to read. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-opelidb1 38167	Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation. Variant of bj-opelidb 38166 where only the sethood of the first component is expressed. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-inexeqex 38168	Lemma for bj-opelid 38170 (but not specific to the identity relation): if the intersection of two classes is a set and the two classes are equal, then both are sets (all three classes are equal, so they all belong to 𝑉, but it is more convenient to have V in the consequent for theorems using it). (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-elsn0 38169	If the intersection of two classes is a set, then these classes are equal if and only if one is an element of the singleton formed on the other. Stronger form of elsng 4594 and elsn2g 4621 (which could be proved from it). (Contributed by BJ, 20-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-opelid 38170	Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation when the intersection of their components are sets. The antecedent is more general than either component being a set. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqg 38171	Characterization of the classes related by the identity relation when their intersection is a set. The antecedent is more general than either class being a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) Weaken the antecedent to sethood of the intersection. (Revised by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.) TODO: replace ideqg 5828, or at least prove ideqg 5828 from it.
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqgALT 38172	Alternate proof of bj-ideqg 38171 from brabga 5507 instead of bj-opelid 38170 itself proved from bj-opelidb 38166. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqb 38173	Characterization of classes related by the identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-idres 38174	Alternate expression for the restricted identity relation. The advantage of that expression is to expose it as a "bounded" class, being included in the Cartesian square of the restricting class. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) This is an alternate of idinxpresid 6039 (see idinxpres 6038). See also elrid 6037 and elidinxp 6035. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-opelidres 38175	Characterization of the ordered pairs in the restricted identity relation when the intersection of their component belongs to the restricting class. TODO: prove bj-idreseq 38176 from it. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ ( I ↾ 𝑉) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-idreseq 38176	Sufficient condition for the restricted identity relation to agree with equality. The instance of bj-ideqg 38171 with V substituted for 𝑉 is a direct consequence of bj-idreseq 38176. This is a strengthening of resieq 5980 which should be proved from it (currently, resieq 5980 relies on ideq 5829). The intersection in the antecedent is not very meaningful, but is a device to prove versions with either class assumed to be a set. It could be enough to prove the version with a disjunctive antecedent: ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → ...). (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-idreseqb 38177	Characterization for two classes to be related under the restricted identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqg1 38178	For sets, the identity relation is the same thing as equality. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalize to a disjunctive antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.) TODO: delete once bj-ideqg 38171 is in the main section.
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqg1ALT 38179	Alternate proof of bj-ideqg1 using brabga 5507 instead of the "unbounded" version bj-brab2a1 38163 or brab2a 5743. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) TODO: delete once bj-ideqg 38171 is in the main section.
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-opelidb1ALT 38180	Characterization of the couples in I. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-elid3 38181	Characterization of the couples in I whose first component is a setvar. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝐴⟩ ∈ I ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-elid4 38182	Characterization of the elements of I. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ I ↔ (1st ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-elid5 38183	Characterization of the elements of I. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ I ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (1st ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-elid6 38184	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ (1st ‘𝐵) = (2nd ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-elid7 38185	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
21.20.6.3  Functionalized identity (diagonal in a Cartesian square) This subsection defines a functionalized version of the identity relation, that can also be seen as the diagonal in a Cartesian square. As explained in df-bj-diag 38187, it will probably be deleted.
Syntax	cdiag2 38186	Syntax for the diagonal of the Cartesian square of a set.
class Id
Definition	df-bj-diag 38187	Define the functionalized identity, which can also be seen as the diagonal function. Its value is given in bj-diagval 38188 when it is viewed as the functionalized identity, and in bj-diagval2 38189 when it is viewed as the diagonal function. Indeed, Definition df-br 5103 identifies a binary relation with the class of couples that are related by that binary relation (see eqrel2 39330 for the extensionality property of binary relations). As a consequence, the identity relation, or identity function (see funi 6572), on any class, can alternatively be seen as the diagonal of the cartesian square of that class. The identity relation on the universal class, I, is an "identity relation generator", since its restriction to any class is the identity relation on that class. It may be useful to consider a functionalized version of that fact, and that is the purpose of df-bj-diag 38187. Note: most proofs will only use its values (Id‘𝐴), in which case it may be enough to use ( I ↾ 𝐴) everywhere and dispense with this definition. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Id = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ( I ↾ 𝑥))
Theorem	bj-diagval 38188	Value of the functionalized identity, or equivalently of the diagonal function. This expression views it as the functionalized identity, whereas bj-diagval2 38189 views it as the diagonal function. See df-bj-diag 38187 for the terminology. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Id‘𝐴) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-diagval2 38189	Value of the functionalized identity, or equivalently of the diagonal function. This expression views it as the diagonal function, whereas bj-diagval 38188 views it as the functionalized identity. See df-bj-diag 38187 for the terminology. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Id‘𝐴) = ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-eldiag 38190	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. Subsumed by bj-elid6 38184. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (Id‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ (1st ‘𝐵) = (2nd ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	bj-eldiag2 38191	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. Subsumed by bj-elid7 38185. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ (Id‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
21.20.6.4  Direct image and inverse image Definitions of the functionalized direct image and inverse image. The functionalized direct (resp. inverse) image is the morphism component of the covariant (resp. contravariant) powerset endofunctor of the category of sets and relations (and, up to restriction, of its subcategory of sets and functions). Its object component is the powerset operation 𝒫 defined in df-pw 4558.
Syntax	cimdir 38192	Syntax for the functionalized direct image.
class 𝒫*
Definition	df-imdir 38193*	Definition of the functionalized direct image, which maps a binary relation between two given sets to its associated direct image relation. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ 𝒫* = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑏) ∧ (𝑟 “ 𝑥) = 𝑦)}))
Theorem	bj-imdirvallem 38194*	Lemma for bj-imdirval 38195 and bj-iminvval 38207. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑏) ∧ 𝜓)}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐶𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}))
Theorem	bj-imdirval 38195*	Value of the functionalized direct image. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 𝒫* 𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑟 “ 𝑥) = 𝑦)}))
Theorem	bj-imdirval2lem 38196*	Lemma for bj-imdirval2 38197 and bj-iminvval2 38208. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-imdirval2 38197*	Value of the functionalized direct image. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 𝒫* 𝐵)‘𝑅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑅 “ 𝑥) = 𝑦)})
Theorem	bj-imdirval3 38198	Value of the functionalized direct image. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋((𝐴 𝒫* 𝐵)‘𝑅)𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑅 “ 𝑋) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	bj-imdiridlem 38199*	Lemma for bj-imdirid 38200 and bj-iminvid 38209. (Contributed by BJ, 26-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑)} = ( I ↾ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-imdirid 38200	Functorial property of the direct image: the direct image by the identity on a set is the identity on the powerset. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 𝒫* 𝐴)‘( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝒫 𝐴))