Theorem bibiad 853

Description: Eliminate an hypothesis 𝜃 in a biconditional. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bibiad.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
bibiad.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
bibiad.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bibiad	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem bibiad

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 488	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜑)
2		bibiad.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
3		simpr 490	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜓)
4		bibiad.3	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
5	4	biimpa 482	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
6	1, 2, 3, 5	syl21anc 851	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
7		simpl 488	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑)
8		bibiad.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
9		simpr 490	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜒)
10	4	biimpar 483	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)
11	7, 8, 9, 10	syl21anc 851	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)
12	6, 11	impbida 813	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402

This theorem is used by:  eqrdav  2760  brab2d  5512  elrgspn  33789  ellpi  33910  brab2dd  49882  uptr  50265  uptr2  50273  ranval3  50683  lmddu  50719  lmdran  50723  cmdlan  50724