Theorem syl1111anc 854

Description: Four-hypothesis elimination deduction for an assertion with a singleton virtual hypothesis collection. Similar to syl112anc 1401 except the unification theorem uses left-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
syl1111anc.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
syl1111anc.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
syl1111anc.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
syl1111anc.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
syl1111anc.5	⊢ ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
syl1111anc	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)

Proof of Theorem syl1111anc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		syl1111anc.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
2		syl1111anc.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
3	1, 2	jca 521	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
4		syl1111anc.3	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
5		syl1111anc.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
6		syl1111anc.5	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)
7	3, 4, 5, 6	syl21anc 851	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402

This theorem is used by:  mpsyl4anc  856  swrdf1  14719  chnind  18709  idlmulssprm  21530  isprmidlc  21535  prmidlc  21536  qsidomlem2  21544  ucnima  24506  f1otrge  29328  mgcf1o  33443  gsumfs2d  33501  cycpmrn  33583  rlocisunit  33716  linds2eq  33814  rhmimaidl  33860  ply1unit  33985  lbsdiflsp0  34136  extdg1id  34176  3cubeslem1  43529  cantnftermord  44161  sineq0ALT  45759  cncfshift  46702  cncfperiod  46707