Theorem syl1111anc 854

Description: Four-hypothesis elimination deduction for an assertion with a singleton virtual hypothesis collection. Similar to syl112anc 1401 except the unification theorem uses left-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
syl1111anc.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
syl1111anc.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
syl1111anc.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
syl1111anc.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
syl1111anc.5	⊢ ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
syl1111anc	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)

Proof of Theorem syl1111anc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		syl1111anc.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
2		syl1111anc.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
3	1, 2	jca 521	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
4		syl1111anc.3	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
5		syl1111anc.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
6		syl1111anc.5	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)
7	3, 4, 5, 6	syl21anc 851	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402

This theorem is used by:  mpsyl4anc  856  swrdf1  14704  chnind  18694  idlmulssprm  21496  isprmidlc  21501  prmidlc  21502  qsidomlem2  21510  ucnima  24466  f1otrge  29250  mgcf1o  33346  gsumfs2d  33404  cycpmrn  33486  rlocisunit  33619  linds2eq  33717  rhmimaidl  33763  ply1unit  33888  lbsdiflsp0  34039  extdg1id  34079  3cubeslem1  43448  cantnftermord  44080  sineq0ALT  45678  cncfshift  46621  cncfperiod  46626