Theorem bj-ceqsaltv 35767

Description: Version of bj-ceqsalt 35766 with a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑉, removing dependency on df-sb 2069 and df-clab 2711. Prefer its use over bj-ceqsalt 35766 when sufficient (in particular when 𝑉 is substituted for V). (Contributed by BJ, 16-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ceqsaltv	⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑉

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bj-ceqsaltv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elissetv 2815	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2	1	3anim3i 1155	. 2 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))
3		bj-ceqsalt0 35764	. 2 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
4	2, 3	syl 17	1 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ w3a 1088  ∀wal 1540   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1782  Ⅎwnf 1786   ∈ wcel 2107

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-12 2172

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-3an 1090  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-clel 2811

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-ceqsalgvALT  35772