Theorem cbvrex2v 3361

Description: Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2407. Use the weaker cbvrex2vw 3251 when possible. (Contributed by FL, 2-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvral2v.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
cbvral2v.2	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrex2v	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑦,𝑧,𝐵   𝑤,𝐵   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝜒,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑤)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑧, 𝑤)   𝜒(𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐴(𝑦, 𝑤)

Proof of Theorem cbvrex2v

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvral2v.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	rexbidv 3192	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
3	2	cbvrexv 3357	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
4		cbvral2v.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
5	4	cbvrexv 3357	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
6	5	rexbii 3115	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
7	3, 6	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209  ∃wrex 3092

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-13 2407

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093

This theorem is used by: (None)