Theorem cbvral2v 3360

Description: Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2367. Use the weaker cbvral2vw 3234 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvral2v.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
cbvral2v.2	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvral2v	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑦,𝑧,𝐵   𝑤,𝐵   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝜒,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑧,𝑤)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑧)   𝐴(𝑦,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem cbvral2v

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvral2v.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	ralbidv 3173	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
3	2	cbvralv 3356	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
4		cbvral2v.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
5	4	cbvralv 3356	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
6	5	ralbii 3089	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
7	3, 6	bitri 275	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wral 3057

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-13 2367

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-tru 1537  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ral 3058

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvral3v  3362