Theorem cbvrex2vw 3229

Description: Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrex2v 3353 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2377. (Contributed by FL, 2-Jul-2012.) Avoid ax-13 2377. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvrex2vw.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
cbvrex2vw.2	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrex2vw	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑤   𝑥,𝐴,𝑧   𝑤,𝐵   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝜒,𝑤   𝜒,𝑥   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑧,𝑤)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑧)   𝐴(𝑦,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem cbvrex2vw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvrex2vw.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	rexbidv 3165	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
3	2	cbvrexvw 3225	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
4		cbvrex2vw.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
5	4	cbvrexvw 3225	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
6	5	rexbii 3084	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
7	3, 6	bitri 275	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206  ∃wrex 3061

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1780  df-clel 2810  df-rex 3062

This theorem is referenced by:  omeu  8602  oeeui  8619  eroveu  8831  genpv  11018  bezoutlem3  16565  bezoutlem4  16566  bezout  16567  4sqlem2  16974  vdwnn  17023  efgrelexlema  19735  dyadmax  25556  2sqlem9  27395  2sq  27398  mulsval2lem  28070  mulsunif2  28130  precsexlemcbv  28165  eucliddivs  28322  legov  28569  dfcgra2  28814  gsumwun  33064  constrcbvlem  33794  pstmfval  33932  satfv0  35385  satfv0fun  35398  fmla1  35414  nn0prpwlem  36345  isbnd2  37812  hashnexinjle  42147  aks6d1c6lem3  42190  nna4b4nsq  42650  oaun3lem1  43365  limsupref  45681  fourierdlem42  46145  fourierdlem54  46156  mogoldbb  47766