![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ceqsexg | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsexg.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 |
ceqsexg.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsexg | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfe1 2150 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) | |
2 | ceqsexg.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfbi 1903 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓) |
4 | ceqex 3655 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
5 | ceqsexg.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
6 | 4, 5 | bibi12d 345 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))) |
7 | biid 261 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) | |
8 | 3, 6, 7 | vtoclg1f 3573 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1539 ∃wex 1778 Ⅎwnf 1782 ∈ wcel 2108 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1794 ax-4 1808 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2708 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-tru 1542 df-ex 1779 df-nf 1783 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-v 3483 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |