Theorem vtoclg1f 3554

Description: Version of vtoclgf 3553 with one nonfreeness hypothesis replaced with a disjoint variable condition, thus avoiding dependency on ax-10 2142 and ax-11 2158. (Contributed by BJ, 1-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
vtoclg1f.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
vtoclg1f.maj	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
vtoclg1f.min	⊢ 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
vtoclg1f	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem vtoclg1f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elisset 2817	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2		vtoclg1f.nf	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
3		vtoclg1f.min	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝜑
4		vtoclg1f.maj	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	mpbii 233	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓)
6	2, 5	exlimi 2218	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓)
7	1, 6	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779  Ⅎwnf 1783   ∈ wcel 2109

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-12 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2715  df-clel 2810

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsexg  3637  mob  3705  opeliunxp2  5823  fvopab5  7024  opeliunxp2f  8214  fprodsplit1f  16011  cnextfvval  24008  dvfsumlem2  25990  dvfsumlem2OLD  25991  dvfsumlem4  25993  bnj981  34986  dmrelrnrel  45217  fmul01  45576  fmuldfeq  45579  fmul01lt1lem1  45580  fprodcnlem  45595  stoweidlem3  45999  stoweidlem26  46022  stoweidlem31  46027  stoweidlem43  46039  stoweidlem51  46047  fourierdlem86  46188  fourierdlem89  46191  fourierdlem91  46193  sge0f1o  46378  salpreimagelt  46703  salpreimalegt  46705