Theorem vtoclg1f 3539

Description: Version of vtoclgf 3538 with one nonfreeness hypothesis replaced with a disjoint variable condition, thus avoiding dependency on ax-10 2142 and ax-11 2158. (Contributed by BJ, 1-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
vtoclg1f.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
vtoclg1f.maj	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
vtoclg1f.min	⊢ 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
vtoclg1f	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem vtoclg1f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elisset 2811	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2		vtoclg1f.nf	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
3		vtoclg1f.min	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝜑
4		vtoclg1f.maj	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	mpbii 233	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓)
6	2, 5	exlimi 2218	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓)
7	1, 6	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779  Ⅎwnf 1783   ∈ wcel 2109

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-12 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-clel 2804

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsexg  3622  mob  3691  opeliunxp2  5805  fvopab5  7004  opeliunxp2f  8192  fprodsplit1f  15963  cnextfvval  23959  dvfsumlem2  25940  dvfsumlem2OLD  25941  dvfsumlem4  25943  bnj981  34947  dmrelrnrel  45227  fmul01  45585  fmuldfeq  45588  fmul01lt1lem1  45589  fprodcnlem  45604  stoweidlem3  46008  stoweidlem26  46031  stoweidlem31  46036  stoweidlem43  46048  stoweidlem51  46056  fourierdlem86  46197  fourierdlem89  46200  fourierdlem91  46202  sge0f1o  46387  salpreimagelt  46712  salpreimalegt  46714