Theorem ceqsexgv 3612

Description: Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) Drop ax-10 2174 and ax-12 2211. (Revised by GG, 1-Dec-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsexgv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsexgv	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsexgv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 23	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2		ceqsexgv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	1, 2	cgsexg 3497	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1568  ∃wex 1807   ∈ wcel 2141

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2143

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-tru 1571  df-ex 1808  df-sb 2095  df-clab 2740  df-clel 2836

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsrexv  3613  clel3g  3619  elxp5  7919  xpsnen  9048  isssc  17876  metuel2  24701  isgrpo  30815  bj-finsumval0  37873  ismgmOLD  38445  brxrn  38978  pmapjat1  40573  dfatdmfcoafv2  47936