Theorem ceqsexgv 3649

Description: Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) Drop ax-10 2145 and ax-12 2177. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 1-Dec-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsexgv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsexgv	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsexgv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2		ceqsexgv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	1, 2	cgsexg 3539	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1780   ∈ wcel 2114

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2795

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1781  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsrexv  3651  clel3g  3656  elxp5  7630  xpsnen  8603  isssc  17092  metuel2  23177  isgrpo  28276  bj-finsumval0  34569  ismgmOLD  35130  brxrn  35628  pmapjat1  36991  dfatdmfcoafv2  43460