Theorem ceqsexgv 3584

Description: Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) Drop ax-10 2140 and ax-12 2174. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 1-Dec-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsexgv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsexgv	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsexgv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2		ceqsexgv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	1, 2	cgsexg 3472	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541  ∃wex 1785   ∈ wcel 2109

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1801  ax-4 1815  ax-5 1916  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2111

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1786  df-sb 2071  df-clab 2717  df-clel 2817

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsrexv  3586  clel3g  3592  elxp5  7757  xpsnen  8812  isssc  17513  metuel2  23702  isgrpo  28838  bj-finsumval0  35435  ismgmOLD  35987  brxrn  36483  pmapjat1  37846  dfatdmfcoafv2  44697