Theorem dedhb 3697

Description: A deduction theorem for converting the inference ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 => ⊢ 𝜑 into a closed theorem. Use nfa1 2141 and nfab 2898 to eliminate the hypothesis of the substitution instance 𝜓 of the inference. For converting the inference form into a deduction form, abidnf 3696 is useful. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dedhb.1	⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
dedhb.2	⊢ 𝜓

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dedhb	⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑧,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑧)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem dedhb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dedhb.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝜓
2		abidnf 3696	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
3	2	eqcomd 2732	. . 3 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
4		dedhb.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
6	1, 5	mpbiri 257	1 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1532   = wceq 1534   ∈ wcel 2099  {cab 2703  Ⅎwnfc 2876

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2697

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878

This theorem is referenced by: (None)