Theorem dfsb7 2276

Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 2068. By introducing a dummy variable 𝑦 in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables 𝑡, 𝑥, and 𝜑 of the definiendum. No distinct variable conflicts arise because 𝑦 effectively insulates 𝑡 from 𝑥. To achieve this, we use a chain of two substitutions in the form of sb5 2268, first 𝑦 for 𝑥 then 𝑡 for 𝑦. Compare Definition 2.1'' of [Quine] p. 17, which is obtained from this theorem by applying df-clab 2716. Theorem sb7h 2531 provides a version where 𝜑 and 𝑦 don't have to be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) Revise df-sb 2068. (Revised by BJ, 25-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Sep-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfsb7	⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝑡   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑡)

Proof of Theorem dfsb7

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbalex 2235	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
2		sbalex 2235	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
3	2	anbi2i 623	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
4	3	exbii 1850	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
5		df-sb 2068	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
6	1, 4, 5	3bitr4ri 304	1 ⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1782  [wsb 2067

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-10 2137  ax-12 2171

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068

This theorem is referenced by:  sbn  2277