P. 23 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2201-2300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	19.9 2201	A wff may be existentially quantified with a variable not free in it. Version of 19.3 2198 with an existential quantifier. Theorem 19.9 of [Margaris] p. 89. See 19.9v 1984 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by FL, 24-Mar-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2017.) Revised to shorten other proofs. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Jul-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	19.21t 2202	Closed form of Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90, see 19.21 2203. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Jan-2018.) df-nf 1781 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 11-Sep-2021.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 3-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)))
Theorem	19.21 2203	Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. The hypothesis can be thought of as "𝑥 is not free in 𝜑". See 19.21v 1936 for a version requiring fewer axioms. See also 19.21h 2291. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) df-nf 1781 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	stdpc5 2204	An axiom scheme of standard predicate calculus that emulates Axiom 5 of [Mendelson] p. 69. The hypothesis Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 can be thought of as emulating "𝑥 is not free in 𝜑". With this definition, the meaning of "not free" is less restrictive than the usual textbook definition; for example 𝑥 would not (for us) be free in 𝑥 = 𝑥 by nfequid 2016. This theorem scheme can be proved as a metatheorem of Mendelson's axiom system, even though it is slightly stronger than his Axiom 5. See stdpc5v 1935 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2018.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2141. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Jul-2021.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	19.21-2 2205	Version of 19.21 2203 with two quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2005.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	19.23t 2206	Closed form of Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.23 2207. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Aug-2020.) df-nf 1781 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 11-Sep-2021.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 8-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	19.23 2207	Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.23v 1939 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	alimd 2208	Deduction form of Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90, see alim 1807. See alimdh 1814, alimdv 1913 for variants requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	alrimi 2209	Inference form of Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90, see 19.21 2203. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	alrimdd 2210	Deduction form of Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90, see 19.21 2203. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	alrimd 2211	Deduction form of Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90, see 19.21 2203. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	eximd 2212	Deduction form of Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90, see exim 1830. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	exlimi 2213	Inference associated with 19.23 2207. See exlimiv 1927 for a version with a disjoint variable condition requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	exlimd 2214	Deduction form of Theorem 19.9 of [Margaris] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Jan-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	exlimimdd 2215	Existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) Shorten exlimdd 2216. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 3-Sep-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	exlimdd 2216	Existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Sep-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	exlimddOLD 2217	Obsolete version of exlimdd 2216 as of 3-Sep-2023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	exlimimddOLD 2218	Obsolete version of exlimimdd 2215 as of 3-Sep-2023. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	nexd 2219	Deduction for generalization rule for negated wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	albid 2220	Formula-building rule for universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	exbid 2221	Formula-building rule for existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	nfbidf 2222	An equality theorem for effectively not free. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) df-nf 1781 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	19.16 2223	Theorem 19.16 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	19.17 2224	Theorem 19.17 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	19.27 2225	Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.27v 1992 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	19.28 2226	Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.28v 1993 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	19.19 2227	Theorem 19.19 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	19.36 2228	Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.36v 1990 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	19.36i 2229	Inference associated with 19.36 2228. See 19.36iv 1943 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	19.37 2230	Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.37v 1994 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	19.32 2231	Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.32v 1937 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	19.31 2232	Theorem 19.31 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.31v 1938 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	19.41 2233	Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.41v 1946 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Jan-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	19.42 2234	Theorem 19.42 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.42v 1950 for a version requiring fewer axioms. See exan 1858 for an immediate version. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	19.44 2235	Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.44v 1995 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	19.45 2236	Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.45v 1996 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	spimfv 2237*	Specialization, using implicit substitution. Version of spim 2401 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2386. See spimvw 1998 for a version with two disjoint variable conditions, requiring fewer axioms, and spimv 2404 for another variant. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	chvarfv 2238*	Implicit substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a theorem. Version of chvar 2409 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2386. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	cbv3v2 2239*	Version of cbv3 2411 with two disjoint variable conditions, which does not require ax-11 2157 nor ax-13 2386. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	sb4av 2240*	Version of sb4a 2505 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2386. The distinctor antecedent from sb4b 2495 is replaced by a disjoint variable condition in this theorem. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Revised by BJ, 15-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]∀𝑡𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑡 → 𝜑))
Theorem	sbimd 2241	Deduction substituting both sides of an implication. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2022.) Revise df-sb 2066. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 9-Jul-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))
Theorem	sbbid 2242	Deduction substituting both sides of a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2141 and ax-13 2386. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2022.) Revise df-sb 2066. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 11-Jul-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))
Theorem	2sbbid 2243	Deduction doubly substituting both sides of a biconditional. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑡 / 𝑥][𝑢 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ [𝑡 / 𝑥][𝑢 / 𝑦]𝜒))
Theorem	sbbidOLD 2244	Obsolete version of sbbid 2242 as of 10-Jul-2023. Deduction substituting both sides of a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2141 and ax-13 2386. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))
Theorem	sbequ1 2245	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1993.) Revise df-sb 2066. (Revised by BJ, 22-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → (𝜑 → [𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sbequ2 2246	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1993.) Revise df-sb 2066. (Revised by BJ, 22-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑))
Theorem	sbequ2OLD 2247	Obsolete version of sbequ2 2246 as of 3-Feb-2024. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Feb-2018.) Revise df-sb 2066. (Revised by BJ, 22-Dec-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑))
Theorem	stdpc7 2248	One of the two equality axioms of standard predicate calculus, called substitutivity of equality. (The other one is stdpc6 2031.) Translated to traditional notation, it can be read: "𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑(𝑥, 𝑥) → 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)), provided that 𝑦 is free for 𝑥 in 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑥)". Axiom 7 of [Mendelson] p. 95. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))
Theorem	sbequ12 2249	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sbequ12r 2250	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	sbelx 2251*	Elimination of substitution. Also see sbel2x 2494. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) Avoid ax-13 2386. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-Aug-2023.) Avoid ax-10 2141. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑))
Theorem	sbequ12a 2252	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑))
Theorem	sbid 2253	An identity theorem for substitution. Remark 9.1 in [Megill] p. 447 (p. 15 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	sbcov 2254*	A composition law for substitution. Version of sbco 2545 with a disjoint variable condition using fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sb6a 2255*	Equivalence for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑))
Theorem	sbid2vw 2256*	Reverting substitution yields the original expression. Based on fewer axioms than sbid2v 2547, at the expense of an extra distinct variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥][𝑥 / 𝑡]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	axc16g 2257*	Generalization of axc16 2258. Use the latter when sufficient. This proof only requires, on top of { ax-1 6-- ax-7 2011 }, theorem ax12v 2174. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Feb-2018.) Remove dependency on ax-13 2386, along an idea of BJ. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Nov-2019.) (Revised by BJ, 7-Jul-2021.) Shorten axc11rv 2262. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 11-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑))
Theorem	axc16 2258*	Proof of older axiom ax-c16 36027. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2006.) (Revised by NM, 22-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	axc16gb 2259*	Biconditional strengthening of axc16g 2257. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1993.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧𝜑))
Theorem	axc16nf 2260*	If dtru 5270 is false, then there is only one element in the universe, so everything satisfies Ⅎ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2157. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Sep-2018.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 14-Jun-2019.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2141. (Revised by Wolf lammen, 12-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜑)
Theorem	axc11v 2261*	Version of axc11 2448 with a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥 and 𝑦, which is provable, on top of { ax-1 6-- ax-7 2011 }, from ax12v 2174 (contrary to axc11 2448 which seems to require the full ax-12 2173 and ax-13 2386). (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) (Revised by BJ, 6-Jul-2021.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	axc11rv 2262*	Version of axc11r 2382 with a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥 and 𝑦, which is provable, on top of { ax-1 6-- ax-7 2011 }, from ax12v 2174 (contrary to axc11 2448 which seems to require the full ax-12 2173 and ax-13 2386, and to axc11r 2382 which seems to require the full ax-12 2173). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jul-2021.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	drsb2 2263	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	equsalv 2264*	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Version of equsal 2435 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2386. See equsalvw 2006 for a version with two disjoint variable conditions requiring fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsexv 2265. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	equsexv 2265*	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Version of equsex 2436 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2386. See equsexvw 2007 for a version with two disjoint variable conditions requiring fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsalv 2264. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	sbft 2266	Substitution has no effect on a non-free variable. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-May-2018.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	sbf 2267	Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it. For a version requiring disjoint variables but fewer axioms, see sbv 2094. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	sbf2 2268	Substitution has no effect on a bound variable. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	sbh 2269	Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	hbs1 2270*	The setvar 𝑥 is not free in [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	nfs1f 2271	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
Theorem	sb5 2272*	Alternate definition of substitution when variables are disjoint. Similar to Theorem 6.1 of [Quine] p. 40. The implication "to the right" is sb1v 2091 and even needs no disjoint variable condition, see sb1 2499. Theorem sb5f 2534 replaces the disjoint variable condition with a non-freeness hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) Shorten sb56 2273. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	sb56 2273*	Two equivalent ways of expressing the proper substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 in 𝜑, when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct, namely, alternate definitions sb5 2272 and sb6 2089. Theorem 6.2 of [Quine] p. 40. The proof does not involve df-sb 2066. The implication "to the left" is equs4 2434 and does not require any disjoint variable condition (but the version with a disjoint variable condition, equs4v 2002, requires fewer axioms). Theorem equs45f 2478 replaces the disjoint variable condition with a non-freeness hypothesis and equs5 2479 replaces it with a distinctor as antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-2008.) Revised to use equsexv 2265 in place of equsex 2436 in order to remove dependency on ax-13 2386. (Revised by BJ, 20-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	sb56OLD 2274*	Obsolete version of sb56 2273 as of 4-Sep-2023. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-2008.) Revised to use equsexv 2265 in place of equsex 2436 in order to remove dependency on ax-13 2386. (Revised by BJ, 20-Dec-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	equs5av 2275*	A property related to substitution that replaces the distinctor from equs5 2479 to a disjoint variable condition. Version of equs5a 2476 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2386. See also sb56 2273. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 15-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	sb6OLD 2276*	Obsolete version of sb6 2089 as of 7-Jul-2023. Equivalence for substitution. Compare Theorem 6.2 of [Quine] p. 40. Also proved as Lemmas 16 and 17 of [Tarski] p. 70. The implication "to the left", sb2vOLD 2093, also holds without a disjoint variable condition (sb2 2500). Theorem sb6f 2533 replaces the disjoint variable condition with a non-freeness hypothesis. Theorem sb4b 2495 replaces it with a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Sep-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	sb5OLD 2277*	Obsolete version of sb5 2272 as of 4-Sep-2023.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	2sb5 2278*	Equivalence for double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	sbco4lem 2279*	Lemma for sbco4 2280. It replaces the temporary variable 𝑣 with another temporary variable 𝑤. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑥 / 𝑣][𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑤][𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sbco4 2280*	Two ways of exchanging two variables. Both sides of the biconditional exchange 𝑥 and 𝑦, either via two temporary variables 𝑢 and 𝑣, or a single temporary 𝑤. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑢][𝑥 / 𝑣][𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑤][𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	dfsb7 2281*	An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 2066. By introducing a dummy variable 𝑦 in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables 𝑡, 𝑥, and 𝜑 of the definiendum. No distinct variable conflicts arise because 𝑦 effectively insulates 𝑡 from 𝑥. To achieve this, we use a chain of two substitutions in the form of sb5 2272, first 𝑦 for 𝑥 then 𝑡 for 𝑦. Compare Definition 2.1'' of [Quine] p. 17, which is obtained from this theorem by applying df-clab 2800. Theorem sb7h 2565 provides a version where 𝜑 and 𝑦 don't have to be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) Revise df-sb 2066. (Revised by BJ, 25-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	dfsb7OLD 2282*	Obsolete version of dfsb7 2281 as of 3-Sep-2023. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) Revise df-sb 2066. (Revised by BJ, 25-Dec-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	sbn 2283	Negation inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Apr-2018.) Revise df-sb 2066. (Revised by BJ, 25-Dec-2020.)
⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ [𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sbex 2284*	Move existential quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sbbibOLD 2285*	Obsolete version of sbbib 2376 as of 4-Sep-2023. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜓))
Theorem	nf5 2286	Alternate definition of df-nf 1781. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) df-nf 1781 changed. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 11-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	nf6 2287	An alternate definition of df-nf 1781. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑))
Theorem	nf5d 2288	Deduce that 𝑥 is not free in 𝜓 in a context. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	nf5di 2289	Since the converse holds by a1i 11, this inference shows that we can represent a not-free hypothesis with either Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 (inference form) or (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑) (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
Theorem	19.9h 2290	A wff may be existentially quantified with a variable not free in it. Theorem 19.9 of [Margaris] p. 89. (Contributed by FL, 24-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jan-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	19.21h 2291	Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. The hypothesis can be thought of as "𝑥 is not free in 𝜑". See also 19.21 2203 and 19.21v 1936. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	19.23h 2292	Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. See 19.23 2207. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	exlimih 2293	Inference associated with 19.23 2207. See exlimiv 1927 for a version with a disjoint variable condition requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	exlimdh 2294	Deduction form of Theorem 19.9 of [Margaris] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	equsalhw 2295*	Version of equsalh 2438 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2386. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	equsexhv 2296*	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Version of equsexh 2439 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2386. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	hba1 2297	The setvar 𝑥 is not free in ∀𝑥𝜑. This corresponds to the axiom (4) of modal logic. Example in Appendix in [Megill] p. 450 (p. 19 of the preprint). Also Lemma 22 of [Monk2] p. 114. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	hbnt 2298	Closed theorem version of bound-variable hypothesis builder hbn 2299. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	hbn 2299	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in ¬ 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	hbnd 2300	Deduction form of bound-variable hypothesis builder hbn 2299. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2002.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓))